9/11/01 Accoutability VS 9/11/12 Accountability

[easyt65]

How is it that Liberals can attack Bush (the President of the United States), demand he and he alone is responsible, and demand he be held accountable for numerous terrorists hijacking numerous planes in numerous different locations, flying them into numerous buildings, and killing thousands of Americans on 9 / 11 / 01....

...yet these SAME insane extremely partisan Liberal freaks fight to the death arguing how neither Hillary (Secretary of State, whose job is partly the protection of US Embassies / Ambassadors) or Obama (President of the United States) are in any way accountable for reducing a US Ambassador's security level below State Department Standards, for denying him repeated requests for additional security - especially considering the threat warnings of pending attacks on 9/11/12 and the call for the assassination of a US ambassador (warnings they ignored), and the resulting murders of 4 US citizens in a terrorist attack?

 

[wihosa]

Did W ever have to testify, openly, in public, under oath?

 

[BlindBoo]

When we were attacked in 2001, Democrats rallied behind the President. When we were attacked in 2012 the Republicans decided not to rally behind the President but have been trying ever since to use that tragedy to politically hurt democrats in 3 elections so far.

 

[irosie91]

When we were attacked in 2001, Democrats rallied behind the President. When we were attacked in 2012 the Republicans decided not to rally behind the President but have been trying ever since to use that tragedy to politically hurt democrats in 3 elections so far.

Live with it ----BOOHOO ----entirely different circumstances

 

[wihosa]

W would have wilted like flower in the sun had he ever had to testify about what he knew and when he knew it, about 9/11/2001

 

[LA RAM FAN]

How is it that Liberals can attack Bush (the President of the United States), demand he and he alone is responsible, and demand he be held accountable for numerous terrorists hijacking numerous planes in numerous different locations, flying them into numerous buildings, and killing thousands of Americans on 9 / 11 / 01....

...yet these SAME insane extremely partisan Liberal freaks fight to the death arguing how neither Hillary (Secretary of State, whose job is partly the protection of US Embassies / Ambassadors) or Obama (President of the United States) are in any way accountable for reducing a US Ambassador's security level below State Department Standards, for denying him repeated requests for additional security - especially considering the threat warnings of pending attacks on 9/11/12 and the call for the assassination of a US ambassador (warnings they ignored), and the resulting murders of 4 US citizens in a terrorist attack?

i have seen very few people here say Bush is alone responsible for it.Clinton was every bit just as much involved in it as well and Obama is committing treason participating in the coverup.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

W would have wilted like flower in the sun had he ever had to testify about what he knew and when he knew it, about 9/11/2001

yep he would have embarrassed himself with one lie after another contradicting his previous lies,funny how politicians get special treatment we dont get being allowed to testify behind closed doors with Bush and Cheney there at the same time instead of individually isn't it?

 

[wihosa]

Well W did ok behind closed doors, not under oath, without a transcript while holding Uncie Dicks hand!

Imagine Hillary had asked for the same type of questioning.