81 year old assaulted in Supermaket, manners are deteriorating.

[hadit]

He had no obligation to walk away, he was the one who was approached.

Tell me, if Sandmann should have walked away then what was Phillips' obligation in this situation? What should Phillips have done or not done on his part so as to avoid this type of incident?

Um, no. Phillips was there as part of a schedule, permitted event.

Was getting in their faces part of his scheduled, permitted event?

The Little Catholic Bastards just showed up and started taunted them wearing their Nazi MAGA hats.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits. You don't need a permit to attend a rally, you need one to have the rally. Since Covington did not organize the rally, they were entirely within their rights to be there.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

Those are, however, the extremes to which their virulent partisanship will take them. They are so completely and thoroughly wedded to their world view that they simply cannot allow ANYTHING to stand that contradicts any part of it. To that end, they are willing to attack women, children, minorities, the unborn, anyone and everyone. It's a mental and emotional sickness that eats away at them from the inside out and will eventually destroy them after a bitter, unhappy existence.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Bullshit. Opinion, nothing more.

As you well know, MAGA stands for "Make America Great Again". What Trump campaigned for was for the U.S. to return to the economic success we enjoyed in the 40s and 50s; a vigorous stock market;

brown people in their place... if you are going to try to pretend that isn't EXACTLY what he means, that is what he was talkign about when he calls them "rapists' and 'animals", then you are a lying sack of shit.

Other than racists and white supremacists, who said "brown people in their place"? Give me proof that this is what he said or what he meant. Otherwise you are a lying sack of shit.

As for a woman's right to choose, she has the choice to use protection before sex. Why is it that pro-choice people never think to advocate for more personal responsibility for these women?

Makes me wonder if you've ever had sex...

First of all, why are you interested in my sex life? Hmm... Secondly, if you think I'm talking about abstinence then you are way off the mark. I don't give a shit about how, when, why or how many times a woman chooses to have sex. I'd just rather they be smart and use some kind of protection before sex so as not to kill a living fetus and hand the rest of us the bill. Thirdly, why didn't you answer the question? Why is it that pro-choice people never think to advocate for more personal responsibility for these women so there would be fewer unwanted pregnancies?

The question of whether or not a woman wants to get pregnant is not a burden the rest of us should have to carry. It is hers and hers alone. It is her choice, not yours, mine or anyone else's. It is not right that a woman has the choice to have unprotected sex and then when she gets pregnant, the child has no choice to live or die and the rest of us have no choice but to pay for it.

Being an elderly veteran does not give one a free pass to be rude. Phillips had no business or any reason whatsoever for approaching those boys and had the choice not to do so.
Also, stop using Phillips' status as a veteran as some kind of virtue in his favor because there was no way that Sandmann could have known the guy was a veteran. And when did people on the left ever give two shits about veterans anyway?

We give more of a shit that the Right that wants to privatize the VA so Trump's rich buddies can get richer.

Which "rich buddies"?

I know if I were rude and taunted an elderly vet, my dad (A WWII vet) would have knocked me into another zip code.

And well he should. Problem is, that's not what happened here.

Everyone knows by now that Phillips is the one who approached the Covington boys and it's obvious that Sandmann's just standing there and smiling was him pointedly not responding so as not escalate the situation.

I know that's the Faux News, high priced PR Firm interpretation..

I have no idea what the PR firm said about it or even what "Faux News" said about it. My interpretation is based on having watched all the videos of the incident from different angles that show the Covington kids minding their own business while waiting for their bus and Phillips approaching them directly and unprovoked instead of heading to the Lincoln Memorial as he claimed he was doing when he could have gotten to the memorial without having to go anywhere near them.

What the rest of us saw was this.

Most Punchable Face- 2019!

And which legitimate news organization performed due diligent journalistic inquiry and investigation to determine for a fact that this is the "Most Punchable Face" of 2019?

The only thing you have proven in this discussion so far is that you hate Catholics and red hats.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

He had no obligation to walk away, he was the one who was approached.

Tell me, if Sandmann should have walked away then what was Phillips' obligation in this situation? What should Phillips have done or not done on his part so as to avoid this type of incident?

Um, no. Phillips was there as part of a schedule, permitted event. The Little Catholic Bastards just showed up and started taunted them wearing their Nazi MAGA hats.

The Covington kids were also there as part of a scheduled, permitted event. They were there for the March For Life rally who had all the proper permits.

So again, what should Phillips have done or not done on his part so as to avoid this type of incident?

 

[jwoodie]

America has become so intolerant of those exercising their constitutional rights, shades of the brown shirts in Nazi Germany have become ever more apparent with the passage of each day. Leads one to ponder just how long the socialist progressives will deny culpability and admit they are what they clam not to be.

They will deny culpability until get in power. After that, the brass knuckles will come out.

 

[JoeB131]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

 

[JoeB131]

First of all, why are you interested in my sex life? Hmm... Secondly, if you think I'm talking about abstinence then you are way off the mark. I don't give a shit about how, when, why or how many times a woman chooses to have sex. I'd just rather they be smart and use some kind of protection before sex so as not to kill a living fetus and hand the rest of us the bill. Thirdly, why didn't you answer the question? Why is it that pro-choice people never think to advocate for more personal responsibility for these women so there would be fewer unwanted pregnancies?

Okay, again, you do realize that a man lecturing a woman on contraception ALWAYS sounds like an asshole, right? Nearly every form of contraception involves a woman sticking something in her body. Maybe what we really need is for contraception to be the man's responsibility. Make US take the fucked up pills that fuck with your emotions.

Here's my only point on abortion. MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS.

 

[skye]

so sad.....so depressing to see


no only manners are deteriorating ....but morals too


81 year old assaulted in Supermaket, manners are deteriorating.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

First of all, why are you interested in my sex life? Hmm... Secondly, if you think I'm talking about abstinence then you are way off the mark. I don't give a shit about how, when, why or how many times a woman chooses to have sex. I'd just rather they be smart and use some kind of protection before sex so as not to kill a living fetus and hand the rest of us the bill. Thirdly, why didn't you answer the question? Why is it that pro-choice people never think to advocate for more personal responsibility for these women so there would be fewer unwanted pregnancies?

Okay, again, you do realize that a man lecturing a woman on contraception ALWAYS sounds like an asshole, right?

Okay, you do realize that a woman who is too lazy to use protection, gets pregnant, kills the baby and then hands us the bill is always a selfish asshole, right?

I don't think you understand where I'm coming from or you just don't want to. I don't give a loose shit in a high wind about any woman's sex life. I don't care that a woman doesn't use protection. I care that a woman doesn't use protection and then expects the rest of us to pay for it, including the child. Get it?

Nearly every form of contraception involves a woman sticking something in her body. Maybe what we really need is for contraception to be the man's responsibility. Make US take the fucked up pills that fuck with your emotions.

Here's my only point on abortion. MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS.[/QUOTE]

I'll mind my own fucking business when they stop using my tax dollars to pay for their mistakes.

Do you understand that once the government started funding abortions, they made it my business? Do you understand that this made it everybody's business?

 

[JoeB131]

Okay, you do realize that a woman who is too lazy to use protection, gets pregnant, kills the baby and then hands us the bill is always a selfish asshole, right?

Nope. Besides the fact no one is handing you a bill, because we don't pay for abortions unlike every other civilized country, the fact is, most women who get pregnant never expected to. Maybe they took contraception that failed. Maybe it was a spur of the moment thing. Maybe she was raped at knifepoint. Maybe she passed out at a frat party and some entitled white frat boys decided she would pull a train.

I don't think you understand where I'm coming from or you just don't want to. I don't give a loose shit in a high wind about any woman's sex life. I don't care that a woman doesn't use protection. I care that a woman doesn't use protection and then expects the rest of us to pay for it, including the child. Get it?

Yes, yes, we get that... you only care about babies when they are in fetus form.. and then fuck that little bastard. You'll gleefully support billions of dollars for a monument to Trump's ego on the Southern Border, planes that won't fly that cost billions, and corporate subsidies for companies that move jobs overseas, but man, some darkie bitch asks for a food stamp, and you are hysterical!

I'll mind my own fucking business when they stop using my tax dollars to pay for their mistakes.

Do you understand that once the government started funding abortions, they made it my business? Do you understand that this made it everybody's business?

Government doesn't fund abortions.. I wish they did.

 

[Papageorgio]

so sad.....so depressing to see


no only manners are deteriorating ....but morals too


81 year old assaulted in Supermaket, manners are deteriorating.

I agree, a group of people decided the hat is racist and stands for hate, so then they claim it is okay to beat people up who wear the hat. It’s also called hate, intolerance and bigotry, however they justify the violence in their hate driven minds. We see examples of this delusional thinking in this very thread.

 

[JoeB131]

I agree, a group of people decided the hat is racist and stands for hate, so then they claim it is okay to beat people up who wear the hat. It’s also called hate, intolerance and bigotry, however they justify the violence in their hate driven minds. We see examples of this delusional thinking in this very thread.

No, we didn't decide that the hat was racist.

A lot of racists just started wearing them..

Which is nice that they are self-identifying...

 

[Blues Man]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

They were on a school trip how does that make them misogynists?

Kids would rather go on any school trip if it gets them out of the classroom for a day

 

[JoeB131]

They were on a school trip how does that make them misogynists?

Kids would rather go on any school trip if it gets then out of the classroom for a day

Then honestly, I put that on the people running the school... if the best thing they could think of was, "Hey, Kids, let's go to Washington and protest a woman's right to make her own medical decisions! Because a bunch of guys in dresses said so!"

 

[hadit]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

They didn't "approach" anyone. Get your facts straight. Of course, that would destroy your narrative, so I don't expect you to.

 

[Blues Man]

They were on a school trip how does that make them misogynists?

Kids would rather go on any school trip if it gets then out of the classroom for a day

Then honestly, I put that on the people running the school... if the best thing they could think of was, "Hey, Kids, let's go to Washington and protest a woman's right to make her own medical decisions! Because a bunch of guys in dresses said so!"

It's a Catholic school what did you expect their view on abortion would be?

Just curious are women who are pro-life misogynists too?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Get off your high horse. Prejudice and hatred against Catholics makes you no better than a misogynist. Which they are not anyway.

You've created a false dichotomy for yourself where concern for the unborn means hatred for women and can be nothing else. It is beyond me how you are even able to get thoughts out of your paper-thin mind and onto the keyboard.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

You almost sound grateful they died when they did.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

It wasn't a Klan hood or a swastika, eh? Secondly, it wasn't a black person, it was you, the mainstream media and an old man with a drum that got triggered. Thirdly, a Klan hood had one intended purpose and that was to convey hate and fear. You and the rest of the Trump Paranoids chose for yourselves to interpret the hat as bigoted.

You know what is pathetic? When Trump was campaigning with his MAGA slogan, people bought and wore the hats in support of that ideal. But do you know why some wear them now? Because they know it will trigger some high-strung twerp to a brain embolism. And you people oblige them every time like Pavlov's dogs.

One last thing. You never answered my question: What could Phillips have done or not done for his part in avoiding this situation?

 

[hadit]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

Here's the law speaking. A black person who assaults someone wearing a Klan hood is guilty of assault while the other person hasn't committed a crime. A Jew who assaults someone wearing a swastika armband is, you guessed it, guilty of assault while the other person hasn't committed a crime. Guess who goes to jail and who gets to sue for damages?

And your poisonous personal opinion matters as much as a fart in a hurricane.

You can be offended, you can be all upset, you can be as mad as you want, but you're not allowed to assault another person.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Okay, you do realize that a woman who is too lazy to use protection, gets pregnant, kills the baby and then hands us the bill is always a selfish asshole, right?

Nope. Besides the fact no one is handing you a bill, because we don't pay for abortions unlike every other civilized country, the fact is,

The federal government partially funds Planned Parenthood and everyone knows this.

most women who get pregnant never expected to.

Of course they didn't expect to you knothead. But the reason they don't expect to is because they don't have enough sense to know that sex without protection might get you pregnant. Egads, how did this happen!? Like repeatedly sticking your finger into a flame and wondering why you keep getting burned.

Maybe they took contraception that failed. Maybe it was a spur of the moment thing. Maybe she was raped at knifepoint. Maybe she passed out at a frat party and some entitled white frat boys decided she would pull a train.

First of all, I'm not talking about rape or failed contraceptives. These are cases where abortion might be legitimately considered. I'm talking about women who are simply careless. Secondly, "spur of the moment" is no excuse.

I don't think you understand where I'm coming from or you just don't want to. I don't give a loose shit in a high wind about any woman's sex life. I don't care that a woman doesn't use protection. I care that a woman doesn't use protection and then expects the rest of us to pay for it, including the child. Get it?

Yes, yes, we get that... you only care about babies when they are in fetus form.. and then fuck that little bastard.

What? Don't try to drag me down into your cesspool of hatred. You won't draw me into a fight where I have to defend myself from your unfounded moral judgments. I'm not biting.

You'll gleefully support billions of dollars for a monument to Trump's ego on the Southern Border, planes that won't fly that cost billions, and corporate subsidies for companies that move jobs overseas, but man, some darkie bitch asks for a food stamp, and you are hysterical!

Who said anything about "darkie bitches"? Why are you bringing race into a discussion about abortion?

I'll mind my own fucking business when they stop using my tax dollars to pay for their mistakes.

Do you understand that once the government started funding abortions, they made it my business? Do you understand that this made it everybody's business?

Government doesn't fund abortions.. I wish they did.

Planned Parenthood.

 

[Blues Man]

First of all, why are you interested in my sex life? Hmm... Secondly, if you think I'm talking about abstinence then you are way off the mark. I don't give a shit about how, when, why or how many times a woman chooses to have sex. I'd just rather they be smart and use some kind of protection before sex so as not to kill a living fetus and hand the rest of us the bill. Thirdly, why didn't you answer the question? Why is it that pro-choice people never think to advocate for more personal responsibility for these women so there would be fewer unwanted pregnancies?

Okay, again, you do realize that a man lecturing a woman on contraception ALWAYS sounds like an asshole, right? Nearly every form of contraception involves a woman sticking something in her body. Maybe what we really need is for contraception to be the man's responsibility. Make US take the fucked up pills that fuck with your emotions.

Here's my only point on abortion. MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS.

That's funny you telling someone else to mind their own business when you sure as hell don't

 

[Papageorgio]

The bottom line remains, the kids were in a public place, were verbally assaulted by the group of racists, did nothing to fight back, then the old guy got in Sandmann's face, who also did nothing to fight back.

And you blame Sandmann, naturally.

The bottom line is, the kids put on racist hats and approached a bunch of people of color who were legally gathering there... and then smirked like little entitled pussies when people got in their racist faces.

Check your privilege, man.

First of all, the Covington kids were there for the March For Life rally and March For Life had all the proper permits.

Another reason to hate these little bastards... they're misogynists as well.

Actually, I don't blame them, they've been getting hte Catholic Brainwashing. I endured it for 12 years and heck, if my parents hadn't died at an early age, I'd probably still believe that shit.

Secondly, if you're going to be triggered by a silly fucking hat to the point of harassing or assaulting someone, I suggest you seek psychiatric counseling. You obviously have bigger problems that the mere absence of a red hat can remedy.

So if some black person gets 'Triggered" by a Klan hood, he has a problem, eh?

Or if some Jew gets triggered by a Swastika Armband, man, he needs to totally lighten up...

Here's the law speaking. A black person who assaults someone wearing a Klan hood is guilty of assault while the other person hasn't committed a crime. A Jew who assaults someone wearing a swastika armband is, you guessed it, guilty of assault while the other person hasn't committed a crime. Guess who goes to jail and who gets to sue for damages?

And your poisonous personal opinion matters as much as a fart in a hurricane.

You can be offended, you can be all upset, you can be as mad as you want, but you're not allowed to assault another person.

That is it! Bigots wanting to commit violent acts against people wearing hats is not justifiable and yet the intolerant left wing morons keep trying to justify intolerance and violence and those that have a view contrary to theirs, they want to silence their right to free speech. The law is not on the side of the extreme left or extreme right when the commit violent acts. If they have an issue with it, they need to contact their representatives and have them work on changing the Constitution.