8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds

[Correll]

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf

+



+

Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules
New rules may make it easier to deny loans to people of color.
Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules

=

a racist motherfucker gone full circle.

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

Everyone knows that plenty of people and companies settle lawsuits to just settle them, not because they are guilty.


Your pretense otherwise, is you being dishonest.

mmmmm & everyone knows that plenty of people & companies settle lawsuits to just settle them, not because they are innocent, but to have a lesser 'punishment' imposed.

donny said he never settles & that is just plain lying. also given his track record, it's more than likely he settled cause he was guilty. good people don't rip off other people whether it's for a fraudulent university, a sham charity foundation, or in housing.

So, your primary piece of evidence that he is racist, is an ancient case, that was never ruled on, and you make a number of assumptions, to get to where you want to be.


YOu have NOTHING.

 

[playtime]

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

"no admission of wrongdoing"

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree,

CONSENT DECREE

n. an order of a judge based upon an agreement, almost always put in writing, between the parties to a lawsuit instead of continuing the case through trial or hearing. It cannot be appealed unless it was based upon fraud by one of the parties (he lied about the situation), mutual mistake (both parties misunderstood the situation) or if the court does not have jurisdiction over the case or the parties. Obviously, such a decree is almost always final and non-appealable since the parties worked it out. A consent decree is a common practice when the government has sued to make a person or corporation comply with the law (improper securities practices, pollution, restraints of trade, conspiracy) or the defendant agrees to the consent decree (often not to repeat the offense) in return for the government not pursuing criminal penalties. In general a consent decree and a consent judgment are the same.
Legal Dictionary - Law.com

 

[EvMetro]

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf

+



+

Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules
New rules may make it easier to deny loans to people of color.
Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules

=

a racist motherfucker gone full circle.

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

 

[Correll]

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

"no admission of wrongdoing"

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree,

CONSENT DECREE

n. an order of a judge based upon an agreement, almost always put in writing, between the parties to a lawsuit instead of continuing the case through trial or hearing. It cannot be appealed unless it was based upon fraud by one of the parties (he lied about the situation), mutual mistake (both parties misunderstood the situation) or if the court does not have jurisdiction over the case or the parties. Obviously, such a decree is almost always final and non-appealable since the parties worked it out. A consent decree is a common practice when the government has sued to make a person or corporation comply with the law (improper securities practices, pollution, restraints of trade, conspiracy) or the defendant agrees to the consent decree (often not to repeat the offense) in return for the government not pursuing criminal penalties. In general a consent decree and a consent judgment are the same.
Legal Dictionary - Law.com

And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

 

[playtime]

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

Everyone knows that plenty of people and companies settle lawsuits to just settle them, not because they are guilty.


Your pretense otherwise, is you being dishonest.

mmmmm & everyone knows that plenty of people & companies settle lawsuits to just settle them, not because they are innocent, but to have a lesser 'punishment' imposed.

donny said he never settles & that is just plain lying. also given his track record, it's more than likely he settled cause he was guilty. good people don't rip off other people whether it's for a fraudulent university, a sham charity foundation, or in housing.

So, your primary piece of evidence that he is racist, is an ancient case, that was never ruled on, and you make a number of assumptions, to get to where you want to be.


YOu have NOTHING.

it sure was ruled upon. donny & daddy drumpf had to take out ads for the 'coloreds' to let them know they can rent in their buildings.

donny is also trying to kill anti housing discrimination laws on the books right now.

 

[playtime]

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

 

[EvMetro]

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf

+



+

Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules
New rules may make it easier to deny loans to people of color.
Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules

=

a racist motherfucker gone full circle.

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

Trump was not ordered to comply with any special laws, he only had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else. The notion that you are peddling that it was some kind of punishment for Trump to be ordered to comply with the same housing laws as everybody else is bigoted. Any notion that Trump was not already complying with fair housing laws before this was dismissed as allegations by the court.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

 

[EvMetro]

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

 

[playtime]

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

"no admission of wrongdoing"

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree,

CONSENT DECREE

n. an order of a judge based upon an agreement, almost always put in writing, between the parties to a lawsuit instead of continuing the case through trial or hearing. It cannot be appealed unless it was based upon fraud by one of the parties (he lied about the situation), mutual mistake (both parties misunderstood the situation) or if the court does not have jurisdiction over the case or the parties. Obviously, such a decree is almost always final and non-appealable since the parties worked it out. A consent decree is a common practice when the government has sued to make a person or corporation comply with the law (improper securities practices, pollution, restraints of trade, conspiracy) or the defendant agrees to the consent decree (often not to repeat the offense) in return for the government not pursuing criminal penalties. In general a consent decree and a consent judgment are the same.
Legal Dictionary - Law.com

And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”

When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.

The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

 

[playtime]

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

they settled & complied with the court order in order to have the case dismissed. they paid big bucks for advertising - which is akin to a fine being imposed.

 

[EvMetro]

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

"no admission of wrongdoing"

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree,

CONSENT DECREE

n. an order of a judge based upon an agreement, almost always put in writing, between the parties to a lawsuit instead of continuing the case through trial or hearing. It cannot be appealed unless it was based upon fraud by one of the parties (he lied about the situation), mutual mistake (both parties misunderstood the situation) or if the court does not have jurisdiction over the case or the parties. Obviously, such a decree is almost always final and non-appealable since the parties worked it out. A consent decree is a common practice when the government has sued to make a person or corporation comply with the law (improper securities practices, pollution, restraints of trade, conspiracy) or the defendant agrees to the consent decree (often not to repeat the offense) in return for the government not pursuing criminal penalties. In general a consent decree and a consent judgment are the same.
Legal Dictionary - Law.com

And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”

When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.

The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

 

[EvMetro]

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

they settled & complied with the court order in order to have the case dismissed. they paid big bucks for advertising - which is akin to a fine being imposed.

You are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment for Trump to have to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as EVERYBODY ELSE.

Are you denying that the case was dismissed as nothing more than allegations? If so, read this wording from the court:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

The fucking case was dismissed as allegations, and you cannot change this.

 

[EvMetro]

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

they settled & complied with the court order in order to have the case dismissed. they paid big bucks for advertising - which is akin to a fine being imposed.

I would hate to have to pay for the advertising budget of any big real estate company. Advertising budgets are part of business, and all real estate companies include the fair housing logo in their advertising.

 

[EvMetro]

And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

There is something REALLY wrong with that guy if his instinct was actually to use a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Who in their right mind would ever consider using a dismissed case as evidence of guilt in any topic or subject? To make things even worse, he then read the court's wording with his very own eyes and continued to argue that it is evidence of guilt. He did all this AFTER he read my posts explaining how lefties have nothing but allegations, DISMISSED CASES, gish gallop, and propaganda. You can't make this shit up.

 

[EvMetro]

Cohen calls Trump a racist: 'In private, he's even worse'

Have you seen how many times I specify that lefties post allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda? The reason why I list these things over and over is because I know that lefties will be posting replies that are limited to these items. Notice how your hearsay post is not actually evidence at all? It doesn't matter what Paul Ryan or Cohen say, they are not who determines who is racist or not. Racism is the belief that one race is superior to another, which is not determined just because Cohen or Paul Ryan say it is so.

 

[EvMetro]

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf

+



+

Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules
New rules may make it easier to deny loans to people of color.
Trump moves to gut Obama housing discrimination rules

=

a racist motherfucker gone full circle.

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

Have you crushed a commie yet today?

 

[playtime]

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

"no admission of wrongdoing"

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree,

CONSENT DECREE

n. an order of a judge based upon an agreement, almost always put in writing, between the parties to a lawsuit instead of continuing the case through trial or hearing. It cannot be appealed unless it was based upon fraud by one of the parties (he lied about the situation), mutual mistake (both parties misunderstood the situation) or if the court does not have jurisdiction over the case or the parties. Obviously, such a decree is almost always final and non-appealable since the parties worked it out. A consent decree is a common practice when the government has sued to make a person or corporation comply with the law (improper securities practices, pollution, restraints of trade, conspiracy) or the defendant agrees to the consent decree (often not to repeat the offense) in return for the government not pursuing criminal penalties. In general a consent decree and a consent judgment are the same.
Legal Dictionary - Law.com

And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”

When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.

The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.

 

[playtime]

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

they settled & complied with the court order in order to have the case dismissed. they paid big bucks for advertising - which is akin to a fine being imposed.

You are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment for Trump to have to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as EVERYBODY ELSE.

Are you denying that the case was dismissed as nothing more than allegations? If so, read this wording from the court:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

The fucking case was dismissed as allegations, and you cannot change this.

were he & daddy drumpf able to walk outa that court without conditions? or did they have to comply with the order to advertise that their rentals were available to brown people?

 

[playtime]

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

uh, ya cause they settled. they complied with the judges orders in order not to have the case continued cause they knew they were screwed if it did.

they settled & the case was dismissed. if they were innocent the judge wouldn't have had them take out ads for coloreds.

Assumptions and opinions about this are worthless. What matters is that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and anything they had on him was in fact classified as allegations by the court.

Again, lefties have zero evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All they have are allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, and propaganda.

they settled & complied with the court order in order to have the case dismissed. they paid big bucks for advertising - which is akin to a fine being imposed.

I would hate to have to pay for the advertising budget of any big real estate company. Advertising budgets are part of business, and all real estate companies include the fair housing logo in their advertising.

THAT was the condition imposed - by the court - in lieu of a continuation where criminal charges brought by the gov'ment to the trumps was a real possibility if they didn't accept.

they finally complied & the case was 'dismissed'. IF they didn't accept that condition & they didn't comply - - -

do you ridiculously think that the judge woulda said 'ok, then... never mind'?

 

[Correll]

Gish gallop in its purest form. Isolate an item and explain how it is racist. Gish gallop itself is not evidence of racism.

He can't. He won't. He knows that if he tries, he loses. So he won't try.


BUt he will never admit it.


IF he starts to try, when you start to crush him, he will change the subject.

i always back up what i say. the link is credible & cannot be debated.

you, cartoon boy - can't even keep it straight that i am a SHE, no matter how many times i've told you. your ability to absorb facts is sorely lacking.

I already explained that all lefties can post are allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, propaganda, or secondhand quotes.

Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should ever consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... you are trying to peddle that it was dismissed because there was no evidence & therefore thrown outa court. auCONtraire.

they settled & that is why it was dismissed.

In 1975, Trump agreed to a consent decree, whereby no admission of wrongdoing would be given, however, his management company was ordered to take out ads telling ethnic minorities that they were welcome to seek housing at Trump properties.
The FBI released hundreds of pages related to a 1970s housing discrimination lawsuit against Trump

& CONsidering the most recent activety where trump's HUD will now make it easier to discriminate, doesn't help yer spin.

The case was in fact dismissed, and all allegations predating the order. Read again, DISMISSED and ALLEGATIONS. This is not my wording, its is the court's.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

And this is some of their "strongest" evidence....


LOL!!!