8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds

Case Name United States v. Fred C. Trump, Donald Trump, and Trump Management, Inc. FH-NY-0024
Docket / Court 73-1529 ( E.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Attorney Organization U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
Case Summary
This case was brought against Fred and Donald Trump, and their real estate company, in 1973 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. We are working to obtain the relevant documents. In the meantime, the facts in the summary are from an article by Michael Kranish and Robert ... Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it (Jan. 23, 2016).

In October 1973, the Justice Department filed this civil rights case in federal court in Brooklyn against Fred Trump, Donald Trump, and their real estate company. The complaint alleged that the firm had committed systemic violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 in their many complexes--39 buildings, between them containing over 14,000 apartments. The allegations included evidence from black and white "testers" who had sought to rent apartments; the white testers were told of vacancies; the black testers were not, or were steered to apartment complexes with a higher proportion of racial minorities. The complaint also alleged that Trump employees had placed codes next to housing applicant names to indicate if they were black.

The Trumps retained Roy Cohn, former aide to Senator Joseph McCarthy, to defend them; they counter-claimed against the government, seeking $100 million in damages for defamation.

The case was assigned to District Judge Edward R. Neaher. He dismissed the counterclaim and allowed the Fair Housing Act suit to proceed.

After two years, the matter settled with a consent decree, signed June 10, 1975. It included the ordinary disclaimer of liability (the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation"), but prohibited the Trumps from "discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling." Fred and Donald Trump were ordered to "thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis" with the Fair Housing Act. The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties. According to a contemporary article in the New York Times, Trump Management was required to furnish the New York Urban League with a weekly list of all apartment vacancies, for two years; the League would get three days to provide qualified applicants for every fifth vacancy in Trump buildings where fewer than 10 percent of the tenants were black.

The Justice Department called the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.” Newspaper headlines echoed that assessment. The New York Amsterdam News, for example, titled its article “Minorities win housing suit,” and told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

In his autobiography, Donald Trump took a different view: “In the end the government couldn’t prove its case, and we ended up making a minor settlement without admitting any guilt.”

https://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=15342

Politically inspired titles of the New York Amsterdam News articles don't prove anything, nor does your gish gallop list. What matters is what the court says about every single allegation:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

You are I bigot if you think it was some kind of punishment that Trump was expected to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else. ALL real estate companies advertise fair housing laws in their advertising.
 
And so, there was never an official ruling, or judgement. And you have nothing but your self serving assumptions.


"no admission of wrongdoing "


And that is your best piece of evidence....


you lose.

Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”


When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.


The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

As I have already told you several times, you will NEVER be able to post a shred of actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist. I have listed for you several times the list of non evidence items that you will be limited to posting from, here it is again: allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda. Every charge in the case against Trump real estate is legally classified as allegations, and you will NEVER be able to post any charges from that case that were not legally classified as allegations, which means you are STILL posting from the non evidence list that you are confined to, and you are clinging to allegations. Every notion of guilt that you post in regard to this case is founded upon legally classified allegations. The gish gallop and propaganda that you post in support of these allegations cannot undo the fact that the case was in fact dismissed, and that all charges were legally and permanently classified as allegations.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
 
Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”


When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.


The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."



IM2 is both a liar and crazy.
 
Folks, when we blacks tell you how blacks see things, learn to listen.

8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds

Lisette Voytko

Topline: A Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that more than eight in ten black Americans view President Trump as “a racist,” with nine in ten respondents disapproving of his job performance⁠—and with the election still ten months away, former vice president Joe Biden is (so far) black Democrats’ candidate of choice.


  • The poll was conducted January 2 to January 8, and painted a largely pessimistic outlook by black Americans, 65% of whom said it was a bad time to be black in America.
  • Despite Trump touting his presidency as being good for black Americans, 77% of respondents said the president should get “only some” or “hardly any” credit for the 5.5% unemployment rate among their community..
  • While the black unemployment rate is at its lowest point in years, it stood at 16.8% in 2010, during Barack Obama’s first term as president, and was at 7.5% when he left office.
  • In terms of their personal financial situations, 54% report no change during Trump’s presidency, even though the stock market has reached record highs.
  • Black Americans who believe Trump to be racist also tend to believe he’s made racism worse in the country and that white Americans do not understand the discrimination they experience.
  • The poll did find, however, that 65% of respondents feel optimistic about their own lives, a belief that crosses political divides and age groups.
8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds
Another poll found that 8 out of 10 black folks in Utah....play for the Jazz.

:dunno:

.
 
Despite Trump’s claims that he hated to settle, he and his father authorized Cohn to make a deal.

Nearly two years of fighting was about to come to an end. But a hitch delayed the signing of a consent decree.

The Justice Department wanted the Trumps to place advertising in local newspapers that assured prospective renters that they were open to people of all races.


The hitch was the cost. Donald Trump went into negotiating mode.


“This advertising, while it’s, you know — I imagine it’s necessary from the Government’s standpoint, is a very expensive thing for us,” Trump said, according to a court transcript. “It is really onerous. Each sentence we put in is going to cost us a lot of money over the period we are supposed to do it.”


When government officials persisted, Trump said, “Will you pay for it?”

The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or priveleges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” The Trumps were ordered to “thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis” with the Fair Housing Act.


The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties.


The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.

The Justice Department claimed victory, calling the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”

Newspaper headlines echoed that view. “Minorities win housing suit,” said the New York Amsterdam News, which told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

As I have already told you several times, you will NEVER be able to post a shred of actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist. I have listed for you several times the list of non evidence items that you will be limited to posting from, here it is again: allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda. Every charge in the case against Trump real estate is legally classified as allegations, and you will NEVER be able to post any charges from that case that were not legally classified as allegations, which means you are STILL posting from the non evidence list that you are confined to, and you are clinging to allegations. Every notion of guilt that you post in regard to this case is founded upon legally classified allegations. The gish gallop and propaganda that you post in support of these allegations cannot undo the fact that the case was in fact dismissed, and that all charges were legally and permanently classified as allegations.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

trump is a racist. You were shown proof.
 
Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

As I have already told you several times, you will NEVER be able to post a shred of actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist. I have listed for you several times the list of non evidence items that you will be limited to posting from, here it is again: allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda. Every charge in the case against Trump real estate is legally classified as allegations, and you will NEVER be able to post any charges from that case that were not legally classified as allegations, which means you are STILL posting from the non evidence list that you are confined to, and you are clinging to allegations. Every notion of guilt that you post in regard to this case is founded upon legally classified allegations. The gish gallop and propaganda that you post in support of these allegations cannot undo the fact that the case was in fact dismissed, and that all charges were legally and permanently classified as allegations.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

trump is a racist. You were shown proof.
These are both what we call an "emotional assertions". Not even an attempt to substantiate either one.
 
Gish gallop in its purest form.

As I have repeated dozens of times, lefties will mm only post allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, or propaganda.

Gish gallop seems to be the most tempting thing for lefties to post. The problem with gish gallop is that lefties cannot isolate even a single item that is actual evidence and not just allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, or propaganda. Gish gallop itself is not evidence.
 
Last edited:

Just out of curiosity, I would love to know what compels a lefty to post gish gallop after gish gallop was discussed on this thread dozens (literally) of times. Did you really think that gish gallop could somehow be evidence of something? Please fill me in on what made you decide to post gish gallop after it was discussed so many times in this thread.
 

Just out of curiosity, I would love to know what compels a lefty to post gish gallop after gish gallop was discussed on this thread dozens (literally) of times. Did you really think that gish gallop could somehow be evidence of something? Please fill me in on what made you decide to post gish gallop after it was discussed so many times in this thread.


Posting a news article does not make me left or right

It makes me aware, as it should you

None are so blind as those who refuse to see....

~S~
 
Trump should get at least 20% of the Black vote in November and will contribute to his landslide victory. That is a record high for a Republican. It should scare the shit out of the filthy Democrats.
 

Just out of curiosity, I would love to know what compels a lefty to post gish gallop after gish gallop was discussed on this thread dozens (literally) of times. Did you really think that gish gallop could somehow be evidence of something? Please fill me in on what made you decide to post gish gallop after it was discussed so many times in this thread.


Posting a news article does not make me left or right

It makes me aware, as it should you

None are so blind as those who refuse to see....

~S~
What made you post this statement about how posting an article would make you left or right when I asked about something completely different? What I asked about was what compelled you to post gish gallop in particular, after gish gallop has been discussed dozens of times on this thread. I am betting that since you are a lefty, you will now evade both of these questions. Lefties dodge, deflect, divert, invert, convert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade when they are asked questions. Watch how your answer fits one of those items, and then how I will be able to quote this prediction.
 
Trump should get at least 20% of the Black vote in November and will contribute to his landslide victory. That is a record high for a Republican. It should scare the shit out of the filthy Democrats.
Yea, I have a feeling Trump will get a lot of the black vote too.
 
Folks, when we blacks tell you how blacks see things, learn to listen.

8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds

Lisette Voytko

Topline: A Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that more than eight in ten black Americans view President Trump as “a racist,” with nine in ten respondents disapproving of his job performance⁠—and with the election still ten months away, former vice president Joe Biden is (so far) black Democrats’ candidate of choice.


  • The poll was conducted January 2 to January 8, and painted a largely pessimistic outlook by black Americans, 65% of whom said it was a bad time to be black in America.
  • Despite Trump touting his presidency as being good for black Americans, 77% of respondents said the president should get “only some” or “hardly any” credit for the 5.5% unemployment rate among their community..
  • While the black unemployment rate is at its lowest point in years, it stood at 16.8% in 2010, during Barack Obama’s first term as president, and was at 7.5% when he left office.
  • In terms of their personal financial situations, 54% report no change during Trump’s presidency, even though the stock market has reached record highs.
  • Black Americans who believe Trump to be racist also tend to believe he’s made racism worse in the country and that white Americans do not understand the discrimination they experience.
  • The poll did find, however, that 65% of respondents feel optimistic about their own lives, a belief that crosses political divides and age groups.
8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds
Your particular reason for not liking Trump is that:
1. He's white.
2. He's not offering free stuff.
 
Do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? You simply cannot go back and overturn the court's ruling on this, any more than you can go back and make hillary the winner of the 2016 election. Dismissed cases are not evidence. The last thing you should EVER consider using as evidence is a dismissed case.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

As I have already told you several times, you will NEVER be able to post a shred of actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist. I have listed for you several times the list of non evidence items that you will be limited to posting from, here it is again: allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda. Every charge in the case against Trump real estate is legally classified as allegations, and you will NEVER be able to post any charges from that case that were not legally classified as allegations, which means you are STILL posting from the non evidence list that you are confined to, and you are clinging to allegations. Every notion of guilt that you post in regard to this case is founded upon legally classified allegations. The gish gallop and propaganda that you post in support of these allegations cannot undo the fact that the case was in fact dismissed, and that all charges were legally and permanently classified as allegations.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

trump is a racist. You were shown proof.
Lol, we all know why you have NEVER posted evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and we know why you NEVER will. You are limited to making claims to have posted it in some secret place.
 
Blacks are as racist as they come. I lived with them bordering S.LA. for 35 years. Continual race attacks. Almost killed many times...just for being white.

Do the right thing Nano lr.jpg


Why on earth do ignorant people think America has to be continually run by 13% of the pop...blacks? All they have to do is look at Africa to see how blacks run things. That is not racism..it is fact. Believe me, if blacks did a better job that whites runing America I'd be all for it.

Down with old white men D.D. Teoli Jr. lr.jpg


Anyway, if Trump is not a racist, then he is a homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe, a transphobe, a Christian and a host of other terrible person things to be in the world according to the filthy conservophobe dems.

Bottom line, the dems base is composed of the scum of the earth, so it is a badge of honor to not be one.

Ilhan Omar 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
lol... cling? uh - no. do you realize how ridiculous it is to cling to the notion that a dismissed case with conditions is really an exoneration of guilt?

hell, that case was back in the 70s. donny has said & done things over the years that only demonstrates his special thoughts & feeling about them 'c's. you are such a good little cheerleader - perhaps he'll hire you next after another of his minions resigns or go to jail.
I see you cannot let go of the notion that a dismissed case somehow proves guilt. I cannot fix your understanding of how our legal system works in this country, but I can assure you that dismissed cases are absolutely NOT evidence of guilt.

If you really think it was some kind of punishment for Trump to have been required to comply with the SAME fair housing laws as everybody else, then it is you who is the bigot. Can you name a real estate company that does not include a fair housing logo in their advertisments? What is it you think Trump had to do that other real estate companies don't do?

The case was not dismissed.

As I have already told you several times, you will NEVER be able to post a shred of actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist. I have listed for you several times the list of non evidence items that you will be limited to posting from, here it is again: allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda. Every charge in the case against Trump real estate is legally classified as allegations, and you will NEVER be able to post any charges from that case that were not legally classified as allegations, which means you are STILL posting from the non evidence list that you are confined to, and you are clinging to allegations. Every notion of guilt that you post in regard to this case is founded upon legally classified allegations. The gish gallop and propaganda that you post in support of these allegations cannot undo the fact that the case was in fact dismissed, and that all charges were legally and permanently classified as allegations.

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

trump is a racist. You were shown proof.
Lol, we all know why you have NEVER posted evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and we know why you NEVER will. You are limited to making claims to have posted it in some secret place.


Libs say the stupidest shit. And you call them on it. But they don't admit that they were stone cold busted.


And then they count that, in their insane fantasy world, as having proved something.


THey are completely delusional, or completely dishonest. Maybe both.
 
Blacks are as racist as they come. I lived with them bordering S.LA. for 35 years. Continual race attacks. Almost killed many times...just for being white.
View attachment 311777

Why on earth do ignorant people think America has to be continually run by 13% of the pop...blacks? All they have to do is look at Africa to see how blacks run things. That is not racism..it is fact. Believe me, if blacks did a better job that whites runing America I'd be all for it.

View attachment 311779

Anyway, if Trump is not a racist, then he is a homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe, a transphobe, a Christian and a host of other terrible person things to be in the world according to the filthy conservophobe dems.

Bottom line, the dems base is composed of the scum of the earth, so it is a badge of honor to not be one.

View attachment 311778

This could be viewed as an irrational statement, since it is not possible for Blacks to be racist in America. They can be prejudice, sure, but they cannot be racist ---here in a society where they lack the tools and weapons needed for their Racism to be effective.

Racism = Power + Hatred. Blacks have no power here in the USA therefore racism cannot exist within Blacks because they have no way to perfect that Racism for exclusively benefiting negro citizens. Whereas we Whites are fully capable of doing that, for exclusively benefiting White citizens.

Black people are not, racist, altho they are in fact hateful. They hate us Caucasians for being racist and continuing to subjugate them for many decades now here in the USA. We Caucasians are racist, Blacks are merely hateful. How? Because we Whites have illegally cheated Blacks since 1863, and it is not the other way around.

Blacks own no Industry Blacks dictate no markets and Blacks control no cultures, therefore they lack the necessary elements to be called racists.

Now HISP can be called, racists, because our society [Obama Admin] has now put HISP above Blacks. And Obama's White HISP (dreamers) have become very racist toward Blacks today. Yes, they use the power Obama secured for them, to be racist toward darkskinned Black citizens. It's part of why Obama is the worst President in USA, history, for our nation's negro citizens.

Now fortunately, President Trump uses his power to get on the right track to changing things for negros. Here's a quick reminder of a few shows of Trump's ironclad, titanium-coated love for negros that I previously listed here:

8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds
 
Last edited:
Blacks are as racist as they come. I lived with them bordering S.LA. for 35 years. Continual race attacks. Almost killed many times...just for being white.
View attachment 311777

Why on earth do ignorant people think America has to be continually run by 13% of the pop...blacks? All they have to do is look at Africa to see how blacks run things. That is not racism..it is fact. Believe me, if blacks did a better job that whites runing America I'd be all for it.

View attachment 311779

Anyway, if Trump is not a racist, then he is a homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe, a transphobe, a Christian and a host of other terrible person things to be in the world according to the filthy conservophobe dems.

Bottom line, the dems base is composed of the scum of the earth, so it is a badge of honor to not be one.

View attachment 311778

This could be viewed as an irrational statement, since it is not possible for Blacks to be racist in America. They can be prejudice, sure, but they cannot be racist ---here in a society where they lack the tools and weapons needed for their Racism to be effective.

Racism = Power + Hatred. Blacks have no power here in the USA....



That is moronic shit.


1 Racism does not require "power" to exist.

2. Blacks often do have power to advance or inflict their racism or hate in this country.

3. You are a racist asshole.
 

Forum List

Back
Top