Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, yea, you can probably pick it up at Amazon.
Won't SEIU purple shirts be going door to door handing them out like the Book of Mormon or the WatchTower?
Remember when Papa Obama was going on one of his 'apology for the US' tours
and he kept doing all the bowing
He inspired this pic
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
SO to repeat, 6 trillion in 8 years bad, 6 trillion in 4 good. Politicizing the war on terror 2001 to 2008 bad, 2009 to present good. No budget in 4 years good. Destroying coal electric plants good. Destroying oil companies good. Building wind farms that cause global warming good. Forcing the production of ethanol that costs more than gas and is worse on the environment good.
What have I missed? Ohh ya no ID for voting great for Democrats and not enforcing our immigration laws while shipping weapons to Mexico illegally all good under Obama.
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
So Obama triples down on it. Brilliant...NOT...Good try though...
Noting that under Obama the war on terror has been more successful then under Bush and that it was Obamas polices that killed Bin Laden and more Al-queda leaders in 1 year then Bush did in his whole term isn't politicizing the war it is noting the fact that Obama policies are better the the GOP'sPoliticizing the war on terror 2001 to 2008 bad, 2009 to present good.
So according to you Obama preside over massive increase sin spending, but he didn't pass a budget of which a budget is the only way to increase spending. So which stupid talking point are you going to stick with because both can't be true.No budget in 4 years good.
Yes when the pollution of those plans causes more economic harm then the energy produced.Destroying coal electric plants good.
Under Obama American oil production has increased more then any other time period; before Obama oil production in America was fallingDestroying oil companies good.
Wind farms to cause global warming; they transfer warm air downwards of which has a net 0 effect on global climateBuilding wind farms that cause global warming good.
Corn/food based Ethanol subsidies have plummeted under Obama; however other biofules have increased of which are cleaner and do not require the use of food to getForcing the production of ethanol that costs more than gas and is worse on the environment good.
Yes Obama hasn't made it so we have to spend billions to get ID's and causing 17% of the country to not be able to vote in order to crack down on non existent voter fraudWhat have I missed? Ohh ya no ID for voting great for Democrats
Obama has seen deportation of illegals skyrocket to record levels.and not enforcing our immigration laws while shipping weapons to Mexico illegally all good under Obama.
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
So Obama triples down on it. Brilliant...NOT...Good try though...
We need to spend more now!
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
BWAHAHAHA
What a stupid fuck.
You must be a Jillian sock.
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
So Obama triples down on it. Brilliant...NOT...Good try though...
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
BWAHAHAHA
What a stupid fuck.
You must be a Jillian sock.
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
Let us learn our lessons. Never, never, never believe any War will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter.
The Statesman who yields to War Fever must realize that once the signal is given he is no longer the Master Of Policy but the Slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events. Antiquated War offices, weak, incompetent, or arrogant commanders, untrustworthy allies, hostile neutrals, malignant fortune, ugly surprises, awful miscalculations ALL take their seats at the council board on the morrow of a declaration of War.
Always remember, however sure you are that you can easily win, that there would not BE a War, if the other man did not think HE also had a chance. Winston Churchill
So Obama triples down on it. Brilliant...NOT...Good try though...
We need to spend more now!
Statists belive throwing money at a problem makes it go away...especially when it isn't thier money.
Nevermind the 'unintended consequences' of selling future generations yet to be born into servitude to pay it off. (Nice ain't it/ the unborns' taxes are spent by Government before they're born).
We're told NOT to look at the result be be glad of thier compassion and INTENT... for thier folly.
So let me get this right..... Bush was bad for spending 6 trillion we did not have in 8 years. Obama not only was good spending 6 trillion we did not have in 4 BUT it was needed and should continue. I got that right?
Noting that under Obama the war on terror has been more successful then under Bush and that it was Obamas polices that killed Bin Laden and more Al-queda leaders in 1 year then Bush did in his whole term isn't politicizing the war it is noting the fact that Obama policies are better the the GOP's
Bushes spending was during a time when the economy was not depressed and resulted in higher inflation; Obamas spending is during a period of economic depression of which results in higher employment/economic activity
So Obama triples down on it. Brilliant...NOT...Good try though...
See this is the problem right-wingers are to stupid to comprehend that different economic circumstances calls for different economic policies; other then that right-wingers are to stupid to notice that austerity has failed every time it is tried