47 vertical support columns in core of each Twin Tower from bedrock to top floor

[DiveCon]

Rebar of the north and west concrete core walls of WTC 1. The empty core area is on the right.

not rebar, because none was used
please show rebar cages during construction

You masters took all he construction photos 3 months after 9-11guiliani took the WTC documents from NYC offices while the courts protect their hiding

Our concern is based on the following facts, as we understand them. On or about December 24, 2001, Commissioner George Rios, on behalf of the City of New York and/or the Department of Records and Information Services of the City of New York, entered into a contract with the Rudolph W. Giuliani Center for Urban Affairs Inc., signed by Saul Cohen, President, concerning the records of the mayoralty of Rudolph Giuliani. The records are said to include appointment books, cabinet meeting audiotapes, e-mails, telephone logs, advance and briefing memos, correspondence, transition materials, and private schedules, as well as Mr. Giuliani’s departmental, travel, event, subject, and Gracie Mansion files. Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes,

Building plans are always part of civic center documents.

The perps, your masters also took the 1990 PBS documentary from the PBS archives as well as libraries across the nation. Dr. ron Larsen Ph.D and a former marine major conducted a search. Here is an update from his 2007 web radio show.

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

I can say to you. "If the steel core columns existed, then show them in the core area on 9-11 when the building were coming part in front of hundreds of cameras."

I can show concrete. A portion of the top of the WTC concrete core falling, surrounded by pieces of perimeter columns.

that photo(removed) is of a FLOOR section(hint: you can see the floor trusses in it) and not any part of the core
since there was ZERO concrete in the core above grade

 

[Christophera]

I can show concrete. A portion of the top of the WTC concrete core falling, surrounded by pieces of perimeter columns.

that photo(removed) is of a FLOOR section(hint: you can see the floor trusses in it) and not any part of the core
since there was ZERO concrete in the core above grade

No trusses are seen. Null post

 

[DiveCon]

I can show concrete. A portion of the top of the WTC concrete core falling, surrounded by pieces of perimeter columns.

that photo(removed) is of a FLOOR section(hint: you can see the floor trusses in it) and not any part of the core
since there was ZERO concrete in the core above grade

No trusses are seen. Null post

thus proving you are nothing but a delusional fucktard

 

[Fizz]

You masters took all he construction photos 3 months after 9-11http://web.archive.org/web/20020224015919/http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html

explain how it is possible to remove every picture of a concrete core from every home, every library and every picture from every server from every country around the world.

please explain how the impossible task of even finding every picture of a concrete core could even be accomplished.

your statement that "masters removed all the pictures" is one of the most delusional and idiotic statements i have ever heard in my entire life.

 

[Christophera]

Your masters took all he construction photos 3 months after 9-11http://web.archive.org/web/20020224015919/http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html

explain how it is possible to remove every picture of a concrete core from every home, every library and every picture from every server from every country around the world.

Explain how you think I could check each place you name and obtain the images or video. I have evidenced that guiliani took the WTC documents containing the photos and the plans.

NIST did not have the plans and the cause of death is not valid.

9-11 images of the core cannot be misrepresented, only misinterpreted and my interpretations are consistent with independent verifications.

Clearly, [url=http://web.archive.org/web/20040807085840/http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/]Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

Explain how you think I could check each place you name and obtain the images or video. I have evidenced that guiliani took the WTC documents containing the photos and the plans.

there are photos of the steel core on the internet. gulliani cant take pictures off the internet. there are no pictures of a concrete core ANYWHERE because there was no concrete core.

NIST did not have the plans and the cause of death is not valid.

robertson gave the NIST the plans. go to his website and read all about it. the cause of death is "homicide" and is valid.

9-11 images of the core cannot be misrepresented, only misinterpreted and my interpretations are consistent with independent verifications.

exactly. and thats why you cant show any images of of the concrete core. they dont exist. you cant misrepresent them.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

you are simply crazy. anyone checking your links can see your delusions that you claim robertson said things he didnt say, oxford isnt saying what you claim it is saying.

here is your missing PBS documentary. it says.........

(wait for it....... )





STEEL CORE!!!!
American Experience | The Center of the World - New York: A Documentary Film

 

[DiveCon]

Explain how you think I could check each place you name and obtain the images or video. I have evidenced that guiliani took the WTC documents containing the photos and the plans.

there are photos of the steel core on the internet. gulliani cant take pictures off the internet. there are no pictures of a concrete core ANYWHERE because there was no concrete core.

NIST did not have the plans and the cause of death is not valid.

robertson gave the NIST the plans. go to his website and read all about it. the cause of death is "homicide" and is valid.

9-11 images of the core cannot be misrepresented, only misinterpreted and my interpretations are consistent with independent verifications.

exactly. and thats why you cant show any images of of the concrete core. they dont exist. you cant misrepresent them.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

you are simply crazy. anyone checking your links can see your delusions that you claim robertson said things he didnt say, oxford isnt saying what you claim it is saying.

here is your missing PBS documentary. it says.........

(wait for it....... )





STEEL CORE!!!!
American Experience | The Center of the World - New York: A Documentary Film

nice find

 

[Christophera]

Explain how you think I could check each place you name and obtain the images or video. I have evidenced that guiliani took the WTC documents containing the photos and the plans.

there are photos of the steel core on the internet. gulliani cant take pictures off the internet. there are no pictures of a concrete core ANYWHERE because there was no concrete core.


robertson gave the NIST the plans. go to his website and read all about it. the cause of death is "homicide" and is valid.


exactly. and thats why you cant show any images of of the concrete core. they dont exist. you cant misrepresent them.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

you are simply crazy. anyone checking your links can see your delusions that you claim robertson said things he didnt say, oxford isnt saying what you claim it is saying.

here is your missing PBS documentary. it says.........

(wait for it....... )

STEEL CORE!!!!
American Experience | The Center of the World - New York: A Documentary Film

nice find

Uh huh. That is what happened to the footage, it got re edited in 2003 into a mass deception. The proof of this is that NO image from 9-11 can be found showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

What is seen is an empty core,

As in "surrounded with rebar" on the left in the above image. Or a concrete tubular core like below when ALL of the exterior stel has fallen away with absolutely NO steel protruding from the core area.

So you can attempt to make Robertson, Domel, and Oxford, wrong, but all you are doing is exposing yourselfs as agents of treason supporting secret methods of mass murder.

 

[Fizz]

you just showed us two pictures of the steel core on 9/11, jackass.

 

[Christophera]

you just showed us two pictures of the steel core on 9/11, jackass.

You've just impeached yourself as a person having any technical ability to identify building material, . . . or confirmed you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder.

The psyops, working to make day into night.

 

[Fizz]

you just showed us two pictures of the steel core on 9/11, jackass.

You've just impeached yourself as a person having any technical ability to identify building material, . . . or confirmed you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder.

The psyops, working to make day into night.

there's no concrete in your pictures. you have proof otherwise?

 

[Christophera]

you just showed us two pictures of the steel core on 9/11, jackass.

You've just impeached yourself as a person having any technical ability to identify building material, . . . or confirmed you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder.

The psyops, working to make day into night.

there's no concrete in your pictures. you have proof otherwise?

By your account this would be steel turned to dust.

And you have totally failed to explain what this is if not concrete.

 

[DiveCon]

no, dipshit
there was concrete in the FLOORS
not in the core

 

[Fizz]

You've just impeached yourself as a person having any technical ability to identify building material, . . . or confirmed you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder.

The psyops, working to make day into night.

there's no concrete in your pictures. you have proof otherwise?

By your account this would be steel turned to dust.

And you have totally failed to explain what this is if not concrete.

no jackass, thats not how it works out here in the real world. YOU are the one claiming it is concrete so it is up to YOU to PROVE IT. it could be made of marshmellows for all we know. if you are going to claim you know what it is then PROVE IT!!!

 

[Christophera]

there's no concrete in your pictures. you have proof otherwise?

By your account this would be steel turned to dust.

And you have totally failed to explain what this is if not concrete.

no jackass, thats not how it works out here in the real world. YOU are the one claiming it is concrete so it is up to YOU to PROVE IT. it could be made of marshmellows for all we know. if you are going to claim you know what it is then PROVE IT!!!

DONE!

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

your "done" is full of lies...... robertson never said what you claim he did. oxford was using the world trade center as an example of what a skyscraper is, etc...

you keep showing pictures and claiming they show concrete. PROVE THEY SHOW CONCRETE. they dont. there was no concrete core. you have no proof. no construction photos. no building plans. no construction worker interviews.

you simply make shit up. where is your documentation that the core columns shown here are really "elevator guide rail supports"???!!