29 excuses for "the pause"!!!

It appears that as far as JC is concerned, ignorance is bliss.
As far as JC is concerned, all you post is junk. Nothing of any value, no meaning, clueless mumbo jumbo. Try posting some real science, the one with the lab experiment that can show what added 120 PPM of CO2 does to the temperatures and climate? That, mumbo jumbo man is the objective and goal of my posts.
 
You blew that when you chose to lie about what you've already been shown.
 
You blew that when you chose to lie about what you've already been shown.
And I've been shown MuMbO JuMbO!!!!! And that is all you have. That's why you can't produce that tiny experiment that confirms your claim that adding 120 PPM of CO2 does anything to our globe. bazinga :banana:
 
:banana::banana:Now to come to think of it..........."29 excuses"...........just goes to show how much of a cult religion these AGW scammers are. This'll be up to 50 before long.........maybe 100. Lets face it.......indeed, the AGW crowd can be the most creative mofus on the planet in an effort to perpetuate the established narrative. Thats the beauty from the beginning of using the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT if you are a climate crusader. Take somethng that has a million variables and make a science out of it. Foolproof if you want to be able to bamboozle the dull among us.:poop:
 
Lets face it......the climate change crowd is losing huge ( as evidence by the crash and burn in spectacular fashion of Cap and Trade ). Their PR game is the suck. They need a Plan B......obviously. Clearly, the 2 decades old strategy of bomb throwing clearly shows that strategy is a train wreck ( as evidenced by EVERY poll that shows a total apathy amongst the public for global warming ). LOL......when CNN of all places says they wont run climate change stories because people change the channel.........:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::oops-28:
 
LOL......when CNN of all places says they wont run climate change stories because people change the channel

What CNN will no longer run is debates on the reality of anthropogenic global warming because they realize the matter is thoroughly settled and that you and yours are fringe whack jobs.

If you want to see the many CNN stories on climate change, simply go to CNN.com Search
 
LOL......when CNN of all places says they wont run climate change stories because people change the channel

What CNN will no longer run is debates on the reality of anthropogenic global warming because they realize the matter is thoroughly settled and that you and yours are fringe whack jobs.

If you want to see the many CNN stories on climate change, simply go to CNN.com Search




meh...............as of 2014, the CNN network doesnt do climate change stories. CEO said it himself.......no interest.

Zucker >>> CNN Boss Zucker Tremendous Lack of Interest in Our Climate Change Stories


Who's not wInNiNg???


So now, virtually ALL of the folks who watch CNN are whack jobs according to the AGW nutters??:blowup:
 
I suppose it must be, sort of. You're gay, aren't you Skooks. My daughter says you are. Says your comments are pure cover up. She makes a good case. No one here knows who you are and no one here cares who you sleep with. Be honest. I bet it'd feel good. Maybe you'd behave less like a jerk.
 
meh...............as of 2014, the CNN network doesnt do climate change stories. CEO said it himself.......no interest.

LOL......when CNN of all places says they wont run climate change stories because people change the channel

What CNN will no longer run is debates on the reality of anthropogenic global warming because they realize the matter is thoroughly settled and that you and yours are fringe whack jobs.

If you want to see the many CNN stories on climate change, simply go to CNN.com Search

meh...............as of 2014, the CNN network doesnt do climate change stories. CEO said it himself.......no interest.

Zucker >>> CNN Boss Zucker Tremendous Lack of Interest in Our Climate Change Stories

Who's not wInNiNg???

So now, virtually ALL of the folks who watch CNN are whack jobs according to the AGW nutters??

CNN boss Jeff Zucker conceded that his audience is not interested in the network's global warming agenda, but he indicated that he will try to find more creative ways to make them care.
"Climate change is one of those stories that deserves more attention, that we all talk about, but we haven't figured out how to engage the audience in that story in a meaningful way," Zucker said Monday at an awards dinner in New York. "When we do do those stories, there does tend to be a tremendous amount of lack of interest on the audience's part."

CNN's ratings have suffered because the network masquerades as being objective while backing a blatantly liberal agenda. However, its climate change push, by Zucker's own admission, may be even too much for the few people who still regularly watch what had once been the "most trusted name in news."
*******************************************************************************
This is the article to which you linked. No where here does Zucker say that he is not going to run climate change stories.

Here are the first five pages of results from a search on CNN for "climate change". This list makes it back to early May (the Breitbart article to which you linked is dated 20 May). Thus this is less than half the climate change stories CNN ran in 2014. Thus your contention is, demonstrably false: another stupid, fucking, Skookerasshole lie.


 
Last edited:
Dang s0n......you've been hanging around Rolling Thunder too much......dazzles with 10,000 word posts that add up to zero.

Hey.....what can I say? CNN says nobody is interested I climate change stories. That's how the article reads to most normal people. Perception in people on the far left is highly hokey........what can you do?:coffee:But when you couple that with the fact that all polls show that, in terms of concerns of the public, global warming ranks 21st out of 22......that sorta supports my perception of the article.:fu::fu:Who knows......perhaps Im wrong? Maybe the hordes are tuning in all over the country right now hoping for a story on climate change!!:itsok:



But the truth is, the msm has been falling all over itself for 2 decades trying to get people to pay attention to global warming. Still not working.
 
The truth is that CNN and most other mainstream media outlets will no longer entertain the idea that any real controversy or debate exists concerning the validity of AGW. The truth is that to most to the world, folks like you and SSDD, Westwall, FCT, Kosh, JC456 and all the rest are fringe whack jobs. You've attained an equivalence with flat-earthers and conspiracy nuts.
 
I've got a better idea. Since this is a discussion about a science topic, follow the science. And once there, as good science does, follow the data.

okay, let's talk science. Artic ice made a major comeback in the last year. So show me how CO2 levels dropped enough to account for it.
 
The truth is that CNN and most other mainstream media outlets will no longer entertain the idea that any real controversy or debate exists concerning the validity of AGW. The truth is that to most to the world, folks like you and SSDD, Westwall, FCT, Kosh, JC456 and all the rest are fringe whack jobs. You've attained an equivalence with flat-earthers and conspiracy nuts.





Whatever you say s0n!!!!!!!!!:boobies::boobies::2up:




They don't run stories because ummmmmm.............nobody cares!!!!!:itsok:




[URL='http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/gallup-voter-priorities.png.html'][/URL]
 
Even Democrats don't give a fuck about global warming >>>>

"Yet, Democrats in the Pew poll said that all of these issues outrank global warming: health care, education, the economy, Social Security, Iraq, jobs, terrorism, the minimum wage (the minimum wage!), taxes, energy policy and the budget deficit. (Warming did manage to beat out flag burning and the inheritance tax among Dems.) Why the disconnect?"


COLD ON WARMING 8211 DEM VOTERS DON 8217 T REALLY CARE New York Post
 

Forum List

Back
Top