25 Devastating Effects Of Climate Change

[skookerasbil]

human racism is gay

Only supported by fringe fruitcakes who are comfortable with consistent losInG!!!.


Fossil fuels are DOMINATING and will continue to dominate no matter how many bomb throwing links the k00ks post up.



[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/snow-jogger_1550920i.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Thunder.....s0n,I gotta say......you are about as clever as a Milk Dud....and the most miserable mofu on the board.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Thunder.....s0n,I gotta say......you are about as clever as a Milk Dud....and the most miserable mofu on the board.

Best thread ever. Looniest AGWCult member gets scammed in broad daylight

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[SSDD]

Your blanket rejection of models does nothing beyond informing us that you don't have a fucking clue.

All the models are good for is to demonstrate how little climate science knows about the climate. The climate models are the AGW/greenhouse hypotheses incarnate and they are spectacular failures....how many failures is a hypothesis allowed in your mind before it is time to scrap it, go back to the basics and see where you went wrong?

 

[RollingThunder]

And there go four more vacuous, meaningless brain-farts from the befuddled denier cult retards. Reality denial is so pathetic.

Meanwhile....

The actual climate science predictions have proved to be pretty accurate.

1981 Climate Change Predictions Were Eerily Accurate
UniverseToday
APRIL 6, 2012

Contrary To Contrarian Claims, IPCC Temperature Projections Have Been Exceptionally Accurate
ClimateProgress
JANUARY 3, 2013

Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013

Climate models accurately predicted global warming when reflecting natural ocean cycles
A new study shows that when synchronized with El Niño/La Niña cycles, climate models accurately predict global surface warming
The Guardian
21 July 2014

 

[skookerasbil]

Thunder.....s0n,I gotta say......you are about as clever as a Milk Dud....and the most miserable mofu on the board.

Best thread ever. Looniest AGWCult member gets scammed in broad daylight

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

I think this guy enjoys being made to look like a jackass at this point. He posts the same 5 or 6 links ALL THE TIME on here like he's going to create some groundswell from this nether-region of the internet. Meanwhile, the public looks at global warming as a snoozefest as Ive astutely pointed out many, many times.......not even debatable......and when I post it up, jackass posts up another thread about temperatures.

 

[jc456]

Thunder.....s0n,I gotta say......you are about as clever as a Milk Dud....and the most miserable mofu on the board.

Best thread ever. Looniest AGWCult member gets scammed in broad daylight

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

I think this guy enjoys being made to look like a jackass at this point. He posts the same 5 or 6 links ALL THE TIME on here like he's going to create some groundswell from this nether-region of the internet. Meanwhile, the public looks at global warming as a snoozefest as Ive astutely pointed out many, many times.......not even debatable......and when I post it up, jackass posts up another thread about temperatures.

He must like himself a lot!!

 

[mamooth]

You deniers certainly like each other a lot, as evidenced by your ongoing frenetic circle-jerks.

Get a room, please.

 

[jc456]

You deniers certainly like each other a lot, as evidenced by your ongoing frenetic circle-jerks.

Get a room, please.

It's so funny when you all get jealous of us smart folk. It's so much fun being us!!! Oh, going in circles can get one dizzy. You should avoid those at all costs.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Models are not scientific evidence

 

[RollingThunder]

WHERE?

Just as we all could figure out a long time ago from your posts, BoobyBobNutJob, you wouldn't know science if it bit you.

25 Devastating Effects Of Climate Change
Business Insider
2.) Hundreds of millions of people will be forced to move by 2050.



International Displacement Monitering Centre - "98% of all displacement in 2012 was related to climate- and weather-related events," according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center.

Climate change may become the biggest driver of displaced people, according to António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

In 2008, 36 million people were displaced by natural disasters. At least 20 million of those people were driven from their homes by disasters related to climate change, like drought and rising sea level, Guterres said.

He anticipates that countries in the Southern Hemisphere will be most affected by displacement in the future. If this happens, "not only states, but cultures and identities will be drowned," Guterres said at a 2009 conference.

The Internal Organization for Migration estimates that 200 million people by 2050 could be forced to leave due to environmental changes.

Even more alarming, a 2014 study published in Environmental Research Letterspredicted that sea level rise created by a temperature increase of 3 degrees C would force more than than 600 million people to find new homes.

Oh boy! More Paul Ehrlich style horse shit to try and scare the savages! Poor little trolling blunder, scared of the boogeyman! Let's see what these same asshats were saying back in the late1960's shall we! Yes! Lets! And take a look at what he wanted to do to control population....PUNISH THE BREEDERS! This fucking totalitarian asshole is the perfect little progressive..... You all probably love him so much! And what's truly funny is this idiot was just as wrong as your morons today are. 30 years from now, when the world has recovered from its collective insanity they will be laughing at you like we laugh at him. "The original edition of The Population Bomb began with this statement: The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate ...[13] Ehrlich argued that the human population was too high already, and that while the level of disaster could be mitigated, humanity could not prevent severe famines, the spread of disease, social unrest, and other negative consequences of overpopulation. However, he argued that societies must take strong action to curb population growth in order to mitigate future disasters both ecological and social. In the book Ehrlich presented a number of "scenarios" detailing possible future events, some of which have been held up as examples of errors in the years since. Of these scenarios, Ehrlich has said that although, "we clearly stated that they were not predictions and that 'we can be sure that none of them will come true as stated,’ (p. 72) – their failure to occur is often cited as a failure of prediction. In honesty, the scenarios were way off, especially in their timing (we underestimated the resilience of the world system). But they did deal with future issues that people in 1968 should have been thinking about." Ehrlich further states that he stands behind the central thesis of the book, and that its message is as apt today as it was in 1968.[11]
Ehrlich's views on the situation have evolved over time, and he has presented a number of different proposed solutions. However, he always has been a strong advocate of government intervention into population control.[citation needed] In Population Bomb he wrote, "We must have population control at home, hopefully through a system of incentives and penalties, but by compulsion if voluntary methods fail. We must use our political power to push other countries into programs which combine agricultural development and population control."[13] Voluntary measures he has supported include the easiest possible availability of birth control and abortions. He was not opposed to mandatory population control if necessary.[citation needed] In 1967 he had expressed his belief that aid should only be given to those countries that were not considered to be "hopeless" to feed their own populations.[14]"Paul R. Ehrlich - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And up pops the Walleyedretard with more irrelevant, off-topic denier cult drivel. Global warming is not causally linked to overpopulation. Although, if the world fails to reduce carbon emissions fairly quickly and we're really unlucky, AGW and its associated climate changes may well 'solve' the population explosion problem completely by killing off a substantial part of the human race. It is a very real possibility.

Walleyed is obviously getting desperate as his cult crashes and burns around him.

The point of my post silly person is your high priests have been making predictions for over 40 years now. And they HAVE ALL FAILED! Just like you!

As usual ,your only point is the one on top of your head.

"Ooooh, somebody said something over 40 years ago about a totally different topic and they were wrong, so that proves that all of the world's climate scientists are wrong now"

Your insanity is hilarious, walleyed!

Meanwhile....

The actual climate science predictions have proved to be pretty accurate.

1981 Climate Change Predictions Were Eerily Accurate
UniverseToday
APRIL 6, 2012

Contrary To Contrarian Claims, IPCC Temperature Projections Have Been Exceptionally Accurate
ClimateProgress
JANUARY 3, 2013

Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013

Climate models accurately predicted global warming when reflecting natural ocean cycles
A new study shows that when synchronized with El Niño/La Niña cycles, climate models accurately predict global surface warming
The Guardian
21 July 2014

You deniers certainly like each other a lot, as evidenced by your ongoing frenetic circle-jerks.

Get a room, please.

It's so funny when you all get jealous of us smart folk. It's so much fun being us!!! Oh, going in circles can get one dizzy. You should avoid those at all costs.

JustCrazy is the poster boy for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect occurs where people fail to adequately assess their level of competence — or specifically, their incompetence — at a task and thus consider themselves much more competent than everyone else. This lack of awareness is attributed to their lower level of competence robbing them of the ability to critically analyse their performance, leading to a significant overestimate of themselves. Put more crudely, they're too stupid to realize they're stupid.

 

[jc456]

Just as we all could figure out a long time ago from your posts, BoobyBobNutJob, you wouldn't know science if it bit you.
QUOTE]
.

I'm sorry, did you say something. I was distracted by the models

 

[RollingThunder]

I'm sorry, did you say something. I was distracted by the models

Denier cultists - "they're too stupid to realize they're stupid."

 

[jc456]

I'm sorry, did you say something. I was distracted by the models

Denier cultists - "they're too stupid to realize they're stupid."

What a shame for you!

 

[skookerasbil]

3,300 posts in one thread by the "Stupids"!!!!!!!

More Proof the skeptics are WINNING US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

More than 110,000 views s0ns!!!!

Dozens of contributors.

The AGW crowd in here? Only 3 or 4..........on an ENVIRONMENT forum much less!!!







ePiCnEsS