Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
It has been 226 years of willful neglect in violation of law, the constitution and oaths of office.
Finally, a Hawaiian activist, Dan Marks, wrote the right letter which got a response exposing the neglect. A state legislator has taken action and it looks like a new, historical house rule is coming up
U.S. House finally adopts rule to count Article V Convention applications - National Progressive Examiner.com
Time to wake up sleepy Americans. An infiltrated government is destroying your futures while main stream media lies to you after government education DID NOT communicate to you the truth about what your republic is and how to enforce its principles.
Wake up or pay the price! Each in denial will be guilty of supreme neglect. The price of this cannot be overstated. America is the only nation on earth that has mechanisms of change built into its constitution that are adequate to model appropriate human activity to meet the future we are creating for ourselves, to survive and to evolve.
Informed Americans need to conduct some critical thinking. Of course I know, you don't or won't (if sincere), that it is possible that covert, cognitive infiltration has altered your world view and you are disabled from putting all of the information together that is in this thread.
What is shared in this thread could easily surround all American politics, because they are not functional and the powers that be know it. That dysfunction has been cultivated for a reason. Perhaps to cultivate a false need or vacuum for control, that ultimately destroys the principals of the 1787 constitution beyond any hope of recovery.
Mark Levin urges states to take back your power from runaway Obama WashingtonExaminer.com
By Paul Bedard Via the Washington Examiner-
The building national movement for a constitutional convention to block President Obama's executive orders got a huge boost Thursday when leading advocate Mark Levin urged state lawmakers to throttle all of Washington, including Republicans.
"Take your power back," he demanded of the hundreds of lawmakers attending the American Legislative Exchange Council convention on Capitol Hill. "You are the last line of defense of liberty."
Levin got star billing because a focus of the winter meeting of the limited government group is pushing for a convention of states, a project of the Citizens for Self-Governance, who sponsored the top talk show host who recently wrote a book laying out constitutional amendments the nation should consider.
He described a nation that is morphing into a "post-constitutional" crisis where state legislatures are "irrelevant," and the president and Congress do whatever they want, and nobody in Washington provides checks and balances.
"We have a president of the United States who says, 'Hey, Congress won't act. I will.' Excuse me? Well what's that? Sounds like a runaway convention to me," he said.
Ditto for Republicans. "Throw out the establishment Republicans and others who are stopping you from doing what you need to do," Levin urged.
To applause, he pushed legislators to consider a convention of 2,000-3,000 delegates to review procedures for hosting a constitutional convention as a warning shot to Congress and the White House. "That alone would shake up this city," he said.
While Levin and convention proponents have support, some at the ALEC event said it was too radical a move, and a few cited criticisms that a conservative-led convention would go too far.
Levin rejected the concerns about a "runaway convention," noting that the Constitution requires many states to approve any action, making it unlikely that a radical idea would get through.
He dismissed critics, and added that proponents are simply trying to save the Constitution.
"Ignore these idiots," he said of critics, adding about his backers, "we're not some cult over here. We're the majority."
-----------------
What is Mark Levin saying?
There is one inconsistency, or maybe I'm not hearing him right.
He says at 9:37 - again at 10:14 "Less than 7 of you in the same room."
Them at 29:30 to 30:30 he describes many more people involved. The latter situation is what I would expect, the former is what I would worry about IF he is talking about ratification.
I worry because ALEC could easily control a few in 3/4 of the states.
The former he is speaking directly to state legislators encouraging them, in the latter he is ridiculing those that fear a runaway convention.
[video=youtube;tdZuV8JnvvA]
_________
Now I’m worried. I tried to find out about three years ago if “Convention of States” (COS) is associated with ALEC in any way. Could not find a connection. Word was a home school guy is behind the Citizens for Self-Governance group that started it. We know the Koch brothers are behind ALEC. Big time exploitation of GATT, petroleum and gas. Perhaps okay if benefitting the US, but it’s sold off shore, Asia and Africa. GATT and NAFTA are treason removing US law from control over US territory.
You will be surprised to know that the cognitive infiltration at Occupy Wall Street forum opposed making ALEC accountable to constitutional intent in 2011.
“Convention of States” seemed more grass roots, but refused to dialogue about the notion that “the people are the rightful masters of the congress and the courts” (Lincoln 1859) and that for them to be the masters they need to be prepared to run a check on CONSTITUTIONAL INTENT. When COS failed to discuss constitutional intent and "Preparatory Amendment", I became suspicious.
"Preparatory Amendment" is the logical, constitutional presumption that America need to prepare for the most important political event in its history.
What I think I may be seeing is two heads of the same monster getting ready to hijack a convention and leave the determination of constitutional intent up to corporations and incumbent politicians USING Obama as an excuse and reason.
With Levin as a ringmaster making comforting noises of saving the constitution for the people to sleep on.
Why didn't these organizations or states work to get him out before he made such a mess? The BC issue, the universities that will not release records, the court decisions violating due process, law and constitutional rights of people trying to get the truth.
What if the infiltrated federal government, OR groups of corporations finally controls enough states (3/4 of the states) to pass amendments that are unconstitutional? If that is the case, the remaining states cannot stop it. We already know congress and the supreme court is not constitutional, so they won't stop it.
Here is an Article V process that might afford some security from hijacking by infiltrated state legislations that would collude with ALEC who appears to be threatening with their hundreds of corporations and 20 years of interacting inappropriately with states legislations to perhaps amend and create a constitution favoring corporate business.
https://www.countermands.us/countermand-amendment.html
Article V is a beautiful law but it appears that it could be used against our interests by very powerful people leading organizations of powerful corporations. Accordingly an education into it can allow us to become "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts". It appears all we need to do is agree amongst ourselves relating to simple, prime constitutional intent,
Let me spell this out for you.
If the people do not know what constitutional intent is, AND the state legislators of 3/4 of the states are in the pocket of the infiltrated federal government, THEN they can amend violating constitutional intent and no one will even know until it is too late.
This reeks of a potential set up folks.
I'm going to runoff into a conspiracy theory that has some facts backing it just to provide some explanation for a larger picture.
IF Obama was put in position to drive the nation to accept Article V, and ALEC with COS are going to run it through the states, THEN it could be very bad. IF Obama is KGB,
Global Elite Picked Obama 171
NESARA- REPUBLIC NOW - GALACTIC NEWS RUSSIAN OFFICIAL OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST KGB AGENT
and ALEC with COS is opposing, it could be just as bad because all of the corporations of ALEC are doing WTO business meaning they are likely NWO.
Accordingly a question arises-Do you want the KGB running America or the NWO? I'm pretty sure we do not want to know the difference.
The reaction over the years to preparatory amendment, since I've been using "the purpose of free speech" as a point of unity, tells me that these people do not have a clue about constitutional intent. And that by understanding that indeed, free speech has a purpose the admins of forums had a knee jerk reaction rejecting it then removing all of my posts and threads from a Tea party forum; patriotaction.net, and I noticed.
Recall, the Koch brothers started the Tea Party.
We do not know exactly what is happening, but something is brewing and it cannot be good. I mean after 226 years congress finally starts following the constitution AND Levin is working with ALEC and convention of states.
Okay, I've though very long and very hard about how this country got so screwed up. Its clear that media has done a tremendous amount of misleading. Some have heard of the "dumbing down", operation paperclip, MKultra, and other conspiracy facts. Yes, they are facts. Ignoring facts is very dangerous for our futures.
The result of that was a re-examination of the intents laid out in the Declaration of Independence.
The framers defined unalienable rights from God, then a right to alter or abolish government destructive to those rights. A proper question arises; "How did the framers intend that the people have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights?" The only logical answer is that the framers intended for the people to be adequately unified deriving their power from their numbers. This raises another question; "What did the framers intend to serve the purpose to enable the unity adequate to create the power to alter or abolish?" The only logical answer is FREEDOM OF SPEECH was to have that purpose.
All of this about the purpose of free speech has a specific structure of lawful action in peaceful revolution, which is what is needed to counter act a hijacking if that is what is planned, and it is a real good idea anyway at about this point in this nations development. This is ultimately about having a specific state by state process of lawful action that make us "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts".
Okay, I know most of this is new to most of you, but it is real and descending upon us. How will we react?
Finally, a Hawaiian activist, Dan Marks, wrote the right letter which got a response exposing the neglect. A state legislator has taken action and it looks like a new, historical house rule is coming up
U.S. House finally adopts rule to count Article V Convention applications - National Progressive Examiner.com
Time to wake up sleepy Americans. An infiltrated government is destroying your futures while main stream media lies to you after government education DID NOT communicate to you the truth about what your republic is and how to enforce its principles.
Wake up or pay the price! Each in denial will be guilty of supreme neglect. The price of this cannot be overstated. America is the only nation on earth that has mechanisms of change built into its constitution that are adequate to model appropriate human activity to meet the future we are creating for ourselves, to survive and to evolve.
Informed Americans need to conduct some critical thinking. Of course I know, you don't or won't (if sincere), that it is possible that covert, cognitive infiltration has altered your world view and you are disabled from putting all of the information together that is in this thread.
What is shared in this thread could easily surround all American politics, because they are not functional and the powers that be know it. That dysfunction has been cultivated for a reason. Perhaps to cultivate a false need or vacuum for control, that ultimately destroys the principals of the 1787 constitution beyond any hope of recovery.
Mark Levin urges states to take back your power from runaway Obama WashingtonExaminer.com
By Paul Bedard Via the Washington Examiner-
The building national movement for a constitutional convention to block President Obama's executive orders got a huge boost Thursday when leading advocate Mark Levin urged state lawmakers to throttle all of Washington, including Republicans.
"Take your power back," he demanded of the hundreds of lawmakers attending the American Legislative Exchange Council convention on Capitol Hill. "You are the last line of defense of liberty."
Levin got star billing because a focus of the winter meeting of the limited government group is pushing for a convention of states, a project of the Citizens for Self-Governance, who sponsored the top talk show host who recently wrote a book laying out constitutional amendments the nation should consider.
He described a nation that is morphing into a "post-constitutional" crisis where state legislatures are "irrelevant," and the president and Congress do whatever they want, and nobody in Washington provides checks and balances.
"We have a president of the United States who says, 'Hey, Congress won't act. I will.' Excuse me? Well what's that? Sounds like a runaway convention to me," he said.
Ditto for Republicans. "Throw out the establishment Republicans and others who are stopping you from doing what you need to do," Levin urged.
To applause, he pushed legislators to consider a convention of 2,000-3,000 delegates to review procedures for hosting a constitutional convention as a warning shot to Congress and the White House. "That alone would shake up this city," he said.
While Levin and convention proponents have support, some at the ALEC event said it was too radical a move, and a few cited criticisms that a conservative-led convention would go too far.
Levin rejected the concerns about a "runaway convention," noting that the Constitution requires many states to approve any action, making it unlikely that a radical idea would get through.
He dismissed critics, and added that proponents are simply trying to save the Constitution.
"Ignore these idiots," he said of critics, adding about his backers, "we're not some cult over here. We're the majority."
-----------------
What is Mark Levin saying?
There is one inconsistency, or maybe I'm not hearing him right.
He says at 9:37 - again at 10:14 "Less than 7 of you in the same room."
Them at 29:30 to 30:30 he describes many more people involved. The latter situation is what I would expect, the former is what I would worry about IF he is talking about ratification.
I worry because ALEC could easily control a few in 3/4 of the states.
The former he is speaking directly to state legislators encouraging them, in the latter he is ridiculing those that fear a runaway convention.
[video=youtube;tdZuV8JnvvA]
_________
Now I’m worried. I tried to find out about three years ago if “Convention of States” (COS) is associated with ALEC in any way. Could not find a connection. Word was a home school guy is behind the Citizens for Self-Governance group that started it. We know the Koch brothers are behind ALEC. Big time exploitation of GATT, petroleum and gas. Perhaps okay if benefitting the US, but it’s sold off shore, Asia and Africa. GATT and NAFTA are treason removing US law from control over US territory.
You will be surprised to know that the cognitive infiltration at Occupy Wall Street forum opposed making ALEC accountable to constitutional intent in 2011.
“Convention of States” seemed more grass roots, but refused to dialogue about the notion that “the people are the rightful masters of the congress and the courts” (Lincoln 1859) and that for them to be the masters they need to be prepared to run a check on CONSTITUTIONAL INTENT. When COS failed to discuss constitutional intent and "Preparatory Amendment", I became suspicious.
"Preparatory Amendment" is the logical, constitutional presumption that America need to prepare for the most important political event in its history.
What I think I may be seeing is two heads of the same monster getting ready to hijack a convention and leave the determination of constitutional intent up to corporations and incumbent politicians USING Obama as an excuse and reason.
With Levin as a ringmaster making comforting noises of saving the constitution for the people to sleep on.
Why didn't these organizations or states work to get him out before he made such a mess? The BC issue, the universities that will not release records, the court decisions violating due process, law and constitutional rights of people trying to get the truth.
What if the infiltrated federal government, OR groups of corporations finally controls enough states (3/4 of the states) to pass amendments that are unconstitutional? If that is the case, the remaining states cannot stop it. We already know congress and the supreme court is not constitutional, so they won't stop it.
Here is an Article V process that might afford some security from hijacking by infiltrated state legislations that would collude with ALEC who appears to be threatening with their hundreds of corporations and 20 years of interacting inappropriately with states legislations to perhaps amend and create a constitution favoring corporate business.
https://www.countermands.us/countermand-amendment.html
Article V is a beautiful law but it appears that it could be used against our interests by very powerful people leading organizations of powerful corporations. Accordingly an education into it can allow us to become "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts". It appears all we need to do is agree amongst ourselves relating to simple, prime constitutional intent,
Let me spell this out for you.
If the people do not know what constitutional intent is, AND the state legislators of 3/4 of the states are in the pocket of the infiltrated federal government, THEN they can amend violating constitutional intent and no one will even know until it is too late.
This reeks of a potential set up folks.
I'm going to runoff into a conspiracy theory that has some facts backing it just to provide some explanation for a larger picture.
IF Obama was put in position to drive the nation to accept Article V, and ALEC with COS are going to run it through the states, THEN it could be very bad. IF Obama is KGB,
Global Elite Picked Obama 171
NESARA- REPUBLIC NOW - GALACTIC NEWS RUSSIAN OFFICIAL OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST KGB AGENT
and ALEC with COS is opposing, it could be just as bad because all of the corporations of ALEC are doing WTO business meaning they are likely NWO.
Accordingly a question arises-Do you want the KGB running America or the NWO? I'm pretty sure we do not want to know the difference.
The reaction over the years to preparatory amendment, since I've been using "the purpose of free speech" as a point of unity, tells me that these people do not have a clue about constitutional intent. And that by understanding that indeed, free speech has a purpose the admins of forums had a knee jerk reaction rejecting it then removing all of my posts and threads from a Tea party forum; patriotaction.net, and I noticed.
Recall, the Koch brothers started the Tea Party.
We do not know exactly what is happening, but something is brewing and it cannot be good. I mean after 226 years congress finally starts following the constitution AND Levin is working with ALEC and convention of states.
Okay, I've though very long and very hard about how this country got so screwed up. Its clear that media has done a tremendous amount of misleading. Some have heard of the "dumbing down", operation paperclip, MKultra, and other conspiracy facts. Yes, they are facts. Ignoring facts is very dangerous for our futures.
The result of that was a re-examination of the intents laid out in the Declaration of Independence.
The framers defined unalienable rights from God, then a right to alter or abolish government destructive to those rights. A proper question arises; "How did the framers intend that the people have the power to alter or abolish government powerful enough to be destructive to unalienable rights?" The only logical answer is that the framers intended for the people to be adequately unified deriving their power from their numbers. This raises another question; "What did the framers intend to serve the purpose to enable the unity adequate to create the power to alter or abolish?" The only logical answer is FREEDOM OF SPEECH was to have that purpose.
All of this about the purpose of free speech has a specific structure of lawful action in peaceful revolution, which is what is needed to counter act a hijacking if that is what is planned, and it is a real good idea anyway at about this point in this nations development. This is ultimately about having a specific state by state process of lawful action that make us "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts".
Okay, I know most of this is new to most of you, but it is real and descending upon us. How will we react?
