Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Big fires, a heat wave that just won't seem to break, and now thunderstorms. In the meantime, the East Coast is getting major flooding over a very large area. And a terrible fire in Greece has killed dozens. Japan has had record flooding and now is getting record heat. But, nothing to see here, folks, just move along.
No it doesn't, and no you haven't.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
Well my research shows no change.
I've taken temps from top to bottom while fishing.....no change.
Big fires, a heat wave that just won't seem to break, and now thunderstorms. In the meantime, the East Coast is getting major flooding over a very large area. And a terrible fire in Greece has killed dozens. Japan has had record flooding and now is getting record heat. But, nothing to see here, folks, just move along.
Every year is a bad year for natural disasters.
Are not false flag events grand... find the arsonists and hang them... Simple cure..I don`t know how climate change can be the cause for 15 fires around Athens to start simultaneously :
Arson suspected in devastating fires in Greece that killed at least 79 people
Arson suspected in devastating fires in Greece that killed at least 79 people
Fifteen fires were started simultaneously on three different fronts in Athens, government spokesman Dimitris Tzanakopoulos told reporters.
You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
WowIts pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
You really are an ignorant fool... "the warmer the water the more energetic the hurricane" Two Words; BULL SHIT..
Pressure gradient and temperature gradient of the atmosphere define this... If the T and P are low a storm will not form even above hot water... If the T and P are low high humidity will do nothing...
You admitted you were totally ignorant up thread and here you go spouting total bull shit...
Unfortunately, there are way too many Americans just like him.You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
He has no answers...he only has what someone told him to say. He has no evidence to support what he says...he has no rational, scientifically valid reply when questioned on anything he says, he has insults and logical fallacies.
He is what is known as a useful idiot....although with most of the claims of climate science being exposed as snake oil and sensationalism, they are becoming less useful all the time.
While it can't be blamed instead of arson for ghe fires starting, oneight look to extra arid conditions for it's effect on the spread or intensity of the fires.I don`t know how climate change can be the cause for 15 fires around Athens to start simultaneously
That's not really accurate. Scientists can measure the frequency/intensity of record lows versus record highs.Funny how the warmers dismiss a record cold as weather because of "the average blah blah blah..." while a heat wave is always the climate and never mind the average.
No wonder you are in a constant state of agitation...you make stuff up just to get yourself riled up.....They really think the world is coming to an end, due to man-made global warming.
In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
What research?
. Second, nothing in there is a reason to reject a particular scientific theory.
Big fires, a heat wave that just won't seem to break, and now thunderstorms. In the meantime, the East Coast is getting major flooding over a very large area. And a terrible fire in Greece has killed dozens. Japan has had record flooding and now is getting record heat. But, nothing to see here, folks, just move along.
Big fires, a heat wave that just won't seem to break, and now thunderstorms. In the meantime, the East Coast is getting major flooding over a very large area. And a terrible fire in Greece has killed dozens. Japan has had record flooding and now is getting record heat. But, nothing to see here, folks, just move along.
That's a shame. But there isn't anything any one can do.
Really.....where do people come up with this shit?
. I'd never be uttering stuff like that in public for fear of being hauled away on a gurneys an put up on 10 East at Northwell Healh Center down the road!
Any child can use an article as a portal to find the research, if interested. You embarrass yourself.In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
What research?
Which research? The only reference to "research" you have provided was an article from USA today. Is that what passes for "research" in that little mind of yours?
You used a damn opinion piece as if it were fact....Any child can use an article as a portal to find the research, if interested. You embarrass yourself.In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
What research?
Which research? The only reference to "research" you have provided was an article from USA today. Is that what passes for "research" in that little mind of yours?
Clearly I did not, and I referred specifically to the results of scientific research. You know, that thing you have done exactly none of.You used a damn opinion piece as if it were fact....Any child can use an article as a portal to find the research, if interested. You embarrass yourself.In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.
What research?
Which research? The only reference to "research" you have provided was an article from USA today. Is that what passes for "research" in that little mind of yours?
You cant even admit your own lies...Clearly I did not, and I referred specifically to the results of scientific research. You know, that thing you have done exactly none of.You used a damn opinion piece as if it were fact....Any child can use an article as a portal to find the research, if interested. You embarrass yourself.In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.What research?
Which research? The only reference to "research" you have provided was an article from USA today. Is that what passes for "research" in that little mind of yours?
