Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.And it also dumped more rain than it would have without man-made global warming. Both are true.
My contention is provable.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.My contention is provable.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.My contention is provable.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.My contention is provable.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
You don't like my answers, do you?You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .Spout it....
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
I agree. Most people are uneducated in science and incurious to learn any. Scientists are aware of this problem, as well. So they book speaking tours in order to speak to adults like they are children.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
But the public perception of Harvey is meh....a hurricane that dumped alot of rain. They dont care what the climate change industry take is on it. So what does that make Harvey? A good trivia question at the local Chili's Restaurant booth games!
In this case, the research I mentioned. I assume you are rejecting it. Which is odd, for the reasons I mentioned.That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
What research?
Maybe this will help you.You don't like my answers, do you?You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
). Or for someone's social life that has always been shit.
Sorry, I won't read that. For one, I am not going to to spoonfeed back to you an article you never read. Second, nothing in there is a reason to reject a particular scientific theory. But you are free to jump off your roof and see if you fall up, this time. You are free to stick a fork in the toaster 100 times, and see if you can prove those experts to be all wrong. Knock yourself out.Maybe this will help you.You don't like my answers, do you?You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
From the Great Walter Williams....
Can We Trust Experts? - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
And yet you have more posts on the topic than anyone.Debating shit like this is nothing more than a hobby for people who's social life has come to a grinding halt! (
WowIts pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .And mine is too. Interestingly enough, the scientific fields and even the scientists who brought us both sets of info overlap.My contention is provable.
It seems rather odd that you two would present scientific findings from these fields as absolute truth, and then reject hoter findings from the same fields without even attempting to understand them. One might think that you both operate from an irrational position, possibly due to superstition or politics.
Odd?
One is easily identified by simple meteorological readings....yours? Not so much.
Wrong, what I am talking about is actually a much simpler concept.
Spout it....
Racist!Sorry, I won't read that. For one, I am not going to to spoonfeed back to you an article you never read. Second, nothing in there is a reason to reject a particular scientific theory. But you are free to jump off your roof and see if you fall up, this time. You are free to stick a fork in the toaster 100 times, and see if you can prove those experts to be all wrong. Knock yourself out.Maybe this will help you.You don't like my answers, do you?You don't like answering questions do you?You do know they are often correct, right?You do know that so called experts, are often wrong...right?
From the Great Walter Williams....
Can We Trust Experts? - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
That doesn't explain what you meant or how it refutes the research.The same...how? And how does saying so negate the scientific research? Please articulate your points.Its pretty simple, really. The warmer the water, the more energetic the hurricane which forms over it. In addition, warmer air holds (then drops) more water. Scientists,not simply satisfied to rest on known principles, formed two separate research groups to study this effect on Harvey. They came to pretty much the exact same conclusion .Spout it....
Thats weird?
I spent thirty years fishing the Gulf and inland waters of Texas.
Still the same.
Because they've been wrong way more often than not?
And yet you have more posts on the topic than anyone.Debating shit like this is nothing more than a hobby for people who's social life has come to a grinding halt! (
Just like like you... LOL..Most people are uneducated in science and incurious to learn any.
