- Oct 19, 2012
- 61,279
- 59,576
- 3,635
Brazil was the better side, but they were given the typical BS host penalty that used to be so common in the World Cup up until the 1990s.
and there we go with the first controversy of the 2014 World Cup.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Brazil was the better side, but they were given the typical BS host penalty that used to be so common in the World Cup up until the 1990s.
What happened to all those vuvuzela horns that we heard at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa? I guess some folks found the sound annoying ... I recall it was drowning out the commentators ... lol
Brazil was the better side, but they were given the typical BS host penalty that used to be so common in the World Cup up until the 1990s.
and there we go with the first controversy of the 2014 World Cup.
Looks like they banned vuvuzelas from all world cup matches ...What happened to all those vuvuzela horns that we heard at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa? I guess some folks found the sound annoying ... I recall it was drowning out the commentators ... lol
The Brazilians would never stand for that
The incessant droning sounds that nearly ruined the 2010 World Cup in South Africa will not be a problem this time around — FIFA just confirmed that vuvuzelas, the "popular" South African horns, have been banned from Rio.
Spain could have ripped Holland apart in the first half but couldn't convert. They look awkward with Costa as the centerforward. They weren't playing their tiki-taka. A lot of old guys.