Big Black Dog
Platinum Member
- May 20, 2009
- 23,425
- 8,069
- 890
It will also show that I have a house with 32 bathroom and I have 17 kids.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.
What problem???
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.
What problem???
Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.
What problem???
Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.
That's where many on the left screwed up in the run up to last month's elections. They demonized Tea Party folks - viciously by some pundits, commentators, etc. - and in so doing completely underestimated the size of those they were offending. They tended IMO to see the TP people as just those actually attending various rallies and never considered people who sat on the sidelines but were in solidarity with the active peoples' point(s) of view. In part that's why the Dimocrats got creamed in the election.
You mean like in Philadelphia?Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.
Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.
Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You mean like in Philadelphia?Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.
Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You've proof of course of this voter discouragement based on race.... other than the New Black Panthers armed at the entrance to polling places intimidating white people?
You mean like in Philadelphia?Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.
Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You've proof of course of this voter discouragement based on race.... other than the New Black Panthers armed at the entrance to polling places intimidating white people?
My proof is court documented cases.
You just ignore the facts and make shit up about ACORN
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.
What problem???
Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.
It will also show that I have a house with 32 bathroom and I have 17 kids.
D.N.J.: Republican National Committee Still Bound by Consent Decree Prohibiting Voter Suppression — NSCLC Website
The RNC argued that the increase in minority turnout and an African-American President and Attorney General made the decrees voter protections unnecessary. The court found these arguments entirely inapposite to the analysis. The relevant inquiry was whether the RNC had to be restrained from further vote suppression, not whether or not the Department of Justice would enforce the VRA. As minority voters continued to manifest a marked aversion to the GOP, the court found the RNCs incentive to suppress their vote had not been lessened. The court also found no election law rendered the terms of the decree illegal or unnecessary and no law had led to an increase in voter fraud whose incidence could only be prevented by modifying the decree.
As for the public interest, the court found overwhelmingly that instances of voter fraud were dwarfed by voter suppression. Specifically, the type of voter fraud that the decree prevents the RNC from combating through voter caging and intimidation at the polls, in-person fraud, is practically nonexistent. Conversely, the court noted that there is ample evidence of the potential and prevalence of voter suppression, such as that recently documented by the Supreme Court in Bartlett v. Strickland, 129 S.Ct. 1231 (2009).