2010 Census all good news for GOP, another nail in the coffin for Dems.......

New population count may complicate Obama 2012 bid - Yahoo! News

By CHARLES BABINGTON, Associated Press


WASHINGTON – The 2010 census report coming out Tuesday will include a boatload of good political news for Republicans and grim data for Democrats hoping to re-elect President Barack Obama and rebound from last month's devastating elections.
The population continues to shift from Democratic-leaning Rust Belt states to Republican-leaning Sun Belt states, a trend the Census Bureau will detail in its once-a-decade report to the president. Political clout shifts, too, because the nation must reapportion the 435 House districts to make them roughly equal in population, based on the latest census figures.
[ For complete coverage of politics and policy, go to Yahoo! Politics ]

The biggest gainer will be Texas, a GOP-dominated state expected to gain up to four new House seats, for a total of 36. The chief losers — New York and Ohio, each projected by nongovernment analysts to lose two seats — were carried by Obama in 2008 and are typical of states in the Northeast and Midwest that are declining in political influence.

Democrats' problems don't end there.

No, no it doesn't end there.

:muahaha:
 
ACORN's now called COI or COIN.

Doesn't really matter much though. You need to stop the Tides Foundation and all the Soros backed groups to really get a handle of who the source of evil in this nation is.
 
Last edited:
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.

What problem???

Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.
 
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.

What problem???

Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.

That's where many on the left screwed up in the run up to last month's elections. They demonized Tea Party folks - viciously by some pundits, commentators, etc. - and in so doing completely underestimated the size of those they were offending. They tended IMO to see the TP people as just those actually attending various rallies and never considered people who sat on the sidelines but were in solidarity with the active peoples' point(s) of view. In part that's why the Dimocrats got creamed in the election.
 
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.

What problem???

Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.

That's where many on the left screwed up in the run up to last month's elections. They demonized Tea Party folks - viciously by some pundits, commentators, etc. - and in so doing completely underestimated the size of those they were offending. They tended IMO to see the TP people as just those actually attending various rallies and never considered people who sat on the sidelines but were in solidarity with the active peoples' point(s) of view. In part that's why the Dimocrats got creamed in the election.

And it's only going to get worse.

Conservative dems are jumping ship and changing parties. (not that I consider that great) But it moves the dnc further left, and pulls the rnc more center. with the addition of TEA to the rnc, that will pull it back to center right.

so what we end up with is the dnc on the left and far left, and the rnc center right to far right.

If this pattern keeps up, they will isolate themselves to thier loyal pockets as the rest of the country moves forward.
 
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.


Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
 
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.


Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You mean like in Philadelphia?

You've proof of course of this voter discouragement based on race.... other than the New Black Panthers armed at the entrance to polling places intimidating white people?
 
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.


Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway

I KNOW!!

Getting the cops to block off streets and getting the fire departments all organised so we can hose them darkies down for dar'n to vote isn't as easy as it seems on TV.

You don't have that little voice in your head that tells you not to do stoopud things do you?
 
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.


Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You mean like in Philadelphia?

You've proof of course of this voter discouragement based on race.... other than the New Black Panthers armed at the entrance to polling places intimidating white people?

My proof is court documented cases.


You just ignore the facts and make shit up about ACORN
 
Maybe the republican party wont have to work to keep poor people of color from voting to win now.


Im sure they love the activity so much they will do it anyway
You mean like in Philadelphia?

You've proof of course of this voter discouragement based on race.... other than the New Black Panthers armed at the entrance to polling places intimidating white people?

My proof is court documented cases.


You just ignore the facts and make shit up about ACORN

The video proof against Acorn is fairly new.

Do you have any links to convictions from this decade?
 
D.N.J.: Republican National Committee Still Bound by Consent Decree Prohibiting Voter Suppression — NSCLC Website


The RNC argued that the increase in minority turnout and an African-American President and Attorney General made the decree’s voter protections unnecessary. The court found these arguments entirely “inapposite” to the analysis. The relevant inquiry was whether the RNC had to be restrained from further vote suppression, not whether or not the Department of Justice would enforce the VRA. As minority voters continued to manifest a marked aversion to the GOP, the court found the RNC’s incentive to suppress their vote had not been lessened. The court also found no election law rendered the terms of the decree illegal or unnecessary and no law had led to an increase in voter fraud whose incidence could only be prevented by modifying the decree.



As for the public interest, the court found overwhelmingly that instances of voter fraud were dwarfed by voter suppression. Specifically, the type of voter fraud that the decree prevents the RNC from combating through voter caging and intimidation at the polls, “in-person” fraud, is practically nonexistent. Conversely, the court noted that there is ample evidence of the potential and prevalence of voter suppression, such as that recently documented by the Supreme Court in Bartlett v. Strickland, 129 S.Ct. 1231 (2009).
 
Last edited:
The dems still have ACORN (or its new names) and the Black Panthers to block polls, and all the illegals to get voting. All we have is the TEA Party. Then again, that worked well last November.

What problem???

Sometime it's going to dawn on most Americans that they are TEA PARTY also. The TEA PARTY is made up of the backbone of America.
It's fairly-obvious the TEA PARTY avoided the brain of America, at all costs.

282.png


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUPMjC9mq5Y[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fevga9jUC48&feature=channel[/ame]​
 
D.N.J.: Republican National Committee Still Bound by Consent Decree Prohibiting Voter Suppression — NSCLC Website


The RNC argued that the increase in minority turnout and an African-American President and Attorney General made the decree’s voter protections unnecessary. The court found these arguments entirely “inapposite” to the analysis. The relevant inquiry was whether the RNC had to be restrained from further vote suppression, not whether or not the Department of Justice would enforce the VRA. As minority voters continued to manifest a marked aversion to the GOP, the court found the RNC’s incentive to suppress their vote had not been lessened. The court also found no election law rendered the terms of the decree illegal or unnecessary and no law had led to an increase in voter fraud whose incidence could only be prevented by modifying the decree.



As for the public interest, the court found overwhelmingly that instances of voter fraud were dwarfed by voter suppression. Specifically, the type of voter fraud that the decree prevents the RNC from combating through voter caging and intimidation at the polls, “in-person” fraud, is practically nonexistent. Conversely, the court noted that there is ample evidence of the potential and prevalence of voter suppression, such as that recently documented by the Supreme Court in Bartlett v. Strickland, 129 S.Ct. 1231 (2009).

I read the whole article. There is a LOT of assumption in it, and just a little to lop sided to be taken seriously.
 

Forum List

Back
Top