20% of american kids now rely on food stamps - Obama loves this and wants more

The biggest welfare recipients from "food stamps" are big agribusiness and the grocery industry. If we were concerned about waste and abuse of the system we could easily fix the system by implementing a strict, limited and standard list of low cost, healthy and nutritional foods for availability to recipients. Instead we continue to operate a system that allows the recipients to obtain expensive, unhealthy foods that are convenient and easy to prepare, or ready to eat. Make food for free programs that only include basics that need preparation and offer nutrition as the primary purpose and the funding of the programs will straighten out themselves. Continue to fund junk type snack foods, sugary cereals, steaks and lobster, cookies and candy, etc., and the programs will mostly benefit big agribusiness and the grocery industry.
 
Last edited:
Any one know how many low wage employees Walmart has? They (Walmart) are our number one employer.
So how many of our number one employers employees are paid so little that they qualify for SNAP?
Anybody know?

When you factor in ALL the low wage employees who are paid so little they can qualify for SNAP, how many people is that?

Why do we have either too low of wages being paid, or to high of an income threshold for SNAP qualifying?

Why do you use illegal slave labor for your projects?

chris-rock-on-minimum-wage..jpeg
 
I find it interesting that the dems war cry is economic inequality. Though I've seen no evidence that they have any real plan beyond taking what have been entry level jobs that never paid enough to live on making they pay more, and us to pay more for stuff too. Jeb and Mitt are making noises. But the far right disavows any govt role in labor markets ... beyond measures to make labor cheaper.

The conservatives have favored plutocratic capitalism, the belief in supply side economics, that the rich are the job creators but those jobs have to pay the smallest wages possible with no benefits in order to increase profits at the top end, that they should receive favorable treatment like low taxation and little oversight and regulation

chris-rock-on-minimum-wage..jpeg
 
Did it bum you out when they were Bush phones?

I have always "bummed out" when the government took money from people that earned it and gave it away to shitheads like that stupid bitch (or anybody else) that didn't earn it.

You are doing the silly elementary school yard shit of "Johnny also did it" and that doesn't excuse the massive Obamaphone program.

This filthy ass Obamaphone program is a great example of how government gets out of control. That Liberal Ronald Reagan thought it would be a good idea to give free phones to indigent older people living in rural areas so they could have a way to contact someone in an emergency. It was about 30K phones nationwide. Bush continued with that program. Even that scumbag Clinton didn't expand it too much. Obama is the one that expanded it in order to buy votes from dumbass welfare queens like the bitch in the video.

Enjoy your phone bill because some of that massive tax that you get each month goes to pay for the stupid bitch's free phone. Of course you being a stupid Moon Bat Libtard you probably have your very own free Obamaphone that somebody else pays for.
 
Last edited:
Did it bum you out when they were Bush phones?

I have always "bummed out" when the government took money from people that earned it and gave it away to shitheads like that stupid bitch (or anybody else) that didn't earn it.

You are doing the silly elementary school yard shit of "Johnny also did it" and that doesn't excuse the massive Obamaphone program.

This filthy ass Obamaphone program is a great example of how government gets out of control. That Liberal Ronald Reagan thought it would be a good idea to give free phones to indigent older people living in rural areas so they could have a way to contact someone in an emergency. It was about 30K phones nationwide. Bush continued with that program. Even that scumbag Clinton didn't expand it too much. Obama is the one that expanded it in order to buy votes from dumbass welfare queens like the bitch in the video.

Enjoy your phone bill because some of that massive tax that you get each month goes to pay for the stupid bitch's free phone. Of course you being a stupid Moon Bat Libtard you probably have your very own free Obamaphone that somebody else pays for.

Dumbass morons don't know or accept, GOV'T POLICY CREATED AMERICA TODAY. Mostly PROGRESSIVE policy like Teddy "trust buster' Roosevelt and FDR,

Some of these things were the ELECTRIFICATION of America plan. Do you THINK that 'free markets' would sting electrical/phone lines to rural areas without Gov't policy (and subsidy)?





All Property, indeed, except the Savage's temporary Cabin, his Bow, his Matchcoat, and other little Acquisitions, absolutely necessary for his Subsistence, seems to me to be the Creature of public Convention. Hence the Public has the Right of Regulating Descents, and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the Quantity and the Uses of it. All the Property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other Laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it.

Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris

Property Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris
 
This filthy ass Obamaphone program is a great example of how government gets out of control. That Liberal Ronald Reagan thought it would be a good idea to give free phones to indigent older people living in rural areas so they could have a way to contact someone in an emergency. It was about 30K phones nationwide. Bush continued with that program. Even that scumbag Clinton didn't expand it too much. Obama is the one that expanded it in order to buy votes from dumbass welfare queens like the bitch in the video.

.

Reagan should have never started it. The constitution does not mention phones and if the govt wants to involve itself in them, they need to amend the constitution. Until then it's a state issue. Fork ronnie.
 
Some of these things were the ELECTRIFICATION of America plan. Do you THINK that 'free markets' would sting electrical/phone lines to rural areas without Gov't policy (and subsidy)?

Hey einstein. The constitution does not mention electricity and if you want it, then ask the states to provide it. THINK
 
Some of these things were the ELECTRIFICATION of America plan. Do you THINK that 'free markets' would sting electrical/phone lines to rural areas without Gov't policy (and subsidy)?

Hey einstein. The constitution does not mention electricity and if you want it, then ask the states to provide it. THINK


Sure Bubba, why shouldn't I want the US to STILL be a 3rd world nation if left up to right wingers like you. THINK
 
This filthy ass Obamaphone program is a great example of how government gets out of control. That Liberal Ronald Reagan thought it would be a good idea to give free phones to indigent older people living in rural areas so they could have a way to contact someone in an emergency. It was about 30K phones nationwide. Bush continued with that program. Even that scumbag Clinton didn't expand it too much. Obama is the one that expanded it in order to buy votes from dumbass welfare queens like the bitch in the video.

.

Reagan should have never started it. The constitution does not mention phones and if the govt wants to involve itself in them, they need to amend the constitution. Until then it's a state issue. Fork ronnie.

"The constitution does not mention phones and if the govt wants to involve itself in them, they need to amend the constitution. Until then it's a state issue."

Apparently you are full of shit and SCOTUS agrees with me :ahole-1:
 
You and the scotus need to read the tenth amendment.
I'd suggest exit your trailer park, go back to school to get your GED, finish a bachelor's degree, take the LSAT, attend law school, embark on a legal career that propels you to a position on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Then your personal interpretation of the Constitution will matter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top