1992 vs 2008 vs 1994 vs 2010

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mal, Nov 2, 2010.

  1. mal
    Offline

    mal Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    42,625
    Thanks Received:
    4,963
    Trophy Points:
    1,813
    Location:
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde™
    Ratings:
    +5,028
    Before the Liberal Media gets too Drunk with not Losing their Senate and telling us that this isn't 1994...

    Let's look at the Context of both 2-year cycles...

    In 1992 57% of Americans Voted AGAINST Bill Clinton.

    In 2008 53% of Americans Voted FOR Barry Obama.

    In 1994 the GOP took the House with 52 Seats Gained...

    In 2010... Done already and the nights not over yet.

    In 1994 the GOP took the Senate with 8 Seats Gained...

    In 2010... Probably 6 - 8... And a larger hill to climb, but a virtual Plurality Politically.

    Why am I Pointing out these numbers?... Context.

    Because the Rejection of Barry is not only from Swing Voters, but it's also from People who Clearly Supported him in 2008...

    A LOT of them.

    In 1994 the American People were Correcting what Ross Perot did with the Assistance of the "Free Press".

    2010 is FAR Worse for the DemocRATS than 1994 was and the Senate Seats that are up in 2012 for the DemocRATS won't be taking tonight's Rejection that Lightly over the next 2 years...

    The Senate is (D) in Name and Responsiblity only now...

    I Assure you they will NOT Align themselves with Obama like they did from 2008 to the 2010 in the coming 2 years.

    The Writing is on the Wall...

    Start Reading it.

    The Media can only Christne O'Donnell 1 or 2 GOP Members of Congress an Election.

    And they will be FAR too busy trying to keep Obama from Losing in 2012 to bother themselves with Protecting Senate Seats or Regaining the House.

    Reality Sucks, don't it.

    Copyright ©2010 - tha malcontent/americanfreepress.org


    :)

    peace...
     
  2. GWV5903
    Offline

    GWV5903 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,364
    Thanks Received:
    890
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    It's just great to know we will wake up tomorrow with Obama's crushed ego sucking wind!!! How sweet it is!!! :fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu:
     
  3. Dark Starscream
    Offline

    Dark Starscream Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    34
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +4

    Hey Republicans! get ready for two years of gridlock and nothing getting done!

    :fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu:
     
  4. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,446
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +629
    GRIDLOCK sounds sweet to me, even starting with letting the tax increase hit. Looks like the dems are already caving on that. So much for "gridlock", its called "let the pandering begin".
     
  5. topspin
    Offline

    topspin BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    4,149
    Thanks Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +196
    It'll be better than gridlock, some dems will go with repubs out of survival instinct.
     
  6. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,936
    Thanks Received:
    5,211
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,676
    Actually, i'm glad that the Dems still have control of the Senate. It'll force Obama to work with the Republicans and I can't see him putting his massive ego aside for any of that. Americans will then throw him out on his ass in 2012.
     
  7. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    Well...it's everybody's economy, now.

    I can't wait to see what our mixed party Congress does with it.
     
  8. mal
    Offline

    mal Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    42,625
    Thanks Received:
    4,963
    Trophy Points:
    1,813
    Location:
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde™
    Ratings:
    +5,028
    The Senate is on Notice...

    They weren't that Quick to Cooperate with Barry when there was 60 Seats...

    Now that the Writing is on the Wall, the Senators who are up in 2012 on the DemocRAT Side, are going to be even LESS Cooperative.

    Bet.

    :)

    peace...
     
  9. mal
    Offline

    mal Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    42,625
    Thanks Received:
    4,963
    Trophy Points:
    1,813
    Location:
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde™
    Ratings:
    +5,028
    When I wrote this last night I didn't even Know how bad it was going to be on every level for DemocRATS... I was only Analyzing the Congress.

    I don't Think they get it yet.

    :)

    peace...
     
  10. GWV5903
    Offline

    GWV5903 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,364
    Thanks Received:
    890
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    That move will insure the demise of Obama.....

    I am okay with that.....
     

Share This Page