bodecea
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #81
What is a person supposed to condemn there is no evidence that anything has taken place there is nothing more then some half baked allegation that someone said something.
It's very easy...let me show you.
"I condemn anyone from any side threatening a 16 year old for simply challenging a public servant to a debate. If it didn't really happen, shame on her for making stuff up. If it DID happen, shame on those threatening her."
Very very simple to do.
How can you condemn something that in all likelihood never happened? I don't do the PC crap you want to shed a few tear's on some imaginary wrong doing by someone have at it.
If it is found that something happen that is clearly wrong then I don't have a problem condemning that. But this doesn't pass the sniff test on many differing levels
OK, you've got me curious...what are those many differing levels?