16 new kills to Obama's credit.

[SniperFire]

Not even in the same category, guy.

Seriously, what the fuck is the matter with you?

This is a tragedy. I have no idea why this soldier snapped. The more I hear about this, the more baffling it becomes. He was a SSG (E-6) Special Operations soldier who was on his fourth tour. He has a wife and two kids. This whole thing makes no sense at all.

The hardcore rightwingers know damn well that they have to spin and cover for Bush, so here they go. Predictable.

.

This isn't even "spinning" for Bush. This is kind of vulture behavior, really. Neither Bush nor Obama was responsible for what this guy did.

Obama, CIC and HMFIC, had that soldier in place there to kill him some towelheads.


deal wit it.

 

[JoeB131]

No he didn't, the intell community finally got him.

and we are still there

Lead by the commander in chief. President Obama put a new policy in place. That's why Bin Laden is dead.

No way Bush was going to have OBL killed. The Bushes and King Abdullah are buddies:

Good grief. You know, I call the right when they say stupid shit, and now I have to call the left when they say stupid shit.

Bin Laden's goal was to overthrow the House of Saud and establish a Caliphate. This crazy "somehow they are all Arabs and in it together" is just as stupid when it comes from the left as when it comes from the right.

 

[OtaniKitano]

Yes. Just like you blamed Bush for causing Katrina.

Loser.

That must be your way of saying 'OUCH.'


ROTFL

No, that's my way of saying you're a loser. And from the looks of this thread, I'm not the only one who thinks you're a loser.

 

[Mac1958]

Not even in the same category, guy.

Seriously, what the fuck is the matter with you?

This is a tragedy. I have no idea why this soldier snapped. The more I hear about this, the more baffling it becomes. He was a SSG (E-6) Special Operations soldier who was on his fourth tour. He has a wife and two kids. This whole thing makes no sense at all.

The hardcore rightwingers know damn well that they have to spin and cover for Bush, so here they go. Predictable.

.

This isn't even "spinning" for Bush. This is kind of vulture behavior, really. Neither Bush nor Obama was responsible for what this guy did.

Agreed. My point is that the hardcore right knows damn well that this and many other horrors would not have happened if we were not there in the first place. They recognize that, and immediately set out to do preemptive damage control and divert by pointing the finger at Obama.

I'm accustomed to the non-stop intellectual dishonesty that is contemporary political discourse -- not that I like it -- but when it comes to the lives, limbs and minds of thousands of American soldiers and the pain to their families, I'm not as forgiving. I'm sick of it.

.

 

[JoeB131]

True. Obama's kills are far worse than anything done in Abu Gharib.

Honestly, I'm not even sure what kind of freakish creature you are that you are twisted up with this much hate.

You think having some guys stand around naked in front of a woman in a prision is worse than Obama's 16 new kills? dude, you are sick. Get some help!

Guy, seriously, you are making Right-Wingers look bad.

Troll.

 

[OtaniKitano]

Lead by the commander in chief. President Obama put a new policy in place. That's why Bin Laden is dead.

No way Bush was going to have OBL killed. The Bushes and King Abdullah are buddies:

Good grief. You know, I call the right when they say stupid shit, and now I have to call the left when they say stupid shit.

Bin Laden's goal was to overthrow the House of Saud and establish a Caliphate.

LOL! Yeah, right. DOn't forget that Bush made sure OBL's family was safely out of the U.S. via privately escorted jets within DAYS of 9/11. That's not third rail information, that's an undisputed fact.

You think you actually have access to OBL's motives through....OUR media? Laughable.

 

[SniperFire]

Honestly, I'm not even sure what kind of freakish creature you are that you are twisted up with this much hate.

You think having some guys stand around naked in front of a woman in a prision is worse than Obama's 16 new kills? dude, you are sick. Get some help!

Guy, seriously, you are making Right-Wingers look bad.

Gosh, who ever saw a Leftists douchbag run from a moral equivalency argument?


LOL

 

[Warrior102]

Attention asshole (OP + others) - this isn't fucking funny. This is a horrific occurrance.

 

[SniperFire]

Barry can add these to the 40K or so civilians he helped net in Libya!

 

[JoeB131]

LOL! Yeah, right. DOn't forget that Bush made sure OBL's family was safely out of the U.S. via privately escorted jets within DAYS of 9/11. That's not third rail information, that's an undisputed fact.

You think you actually have access to OBL's motives through....OUR media? Laughable.

No, I would judge Bin Laden's motives through Bin Ladens own actions and statements.

Although his recent actions are limited to "feeding the fish".

Bin Laden's family has denounced his actions. Many of them have changed their last name.

So what did Bush do? In order to NOT complicate an already tense situation, he got relatives out of harms way.

Or do you think that we should have just let these people, most of them college students, get killed by some bubba-redneck types? That would have gone over well.

 

[Sallow]

Lead by the commander in chief. President Obama put a new policy in place. That's why Bin Laden is dead.

No way Bush was going to have OBL killed. The Bushes and King Abdullah are buddies:

Good grief. You know, I call the right when they say stupid shit, and now I have to call the left when they say stupid shit.

Bin Laden's goal was to overthrow the House of Saud and establish a Caliphate. This crazy "somehow they are all Arabs and in it together" is just as stupid when it comes from the left as when it comes from the right.

Not entirely.

The Saudis wanted the US to attack Iraq. They couldn't get Clinton to do it..and they might have done a little bit of work..like reading the PNAC doctrine. That specifically points out that it would take a "Pearl Harbor" like event..for the US to attack Iraq. Bush was motivated but didn't have a reason.

The Fact remains that the Saudis met with the terrorists that did the attack..and possibly funded them. The other facts that are germane were most of the terrorists were Saudi.

And the Saudis own part of FOX.

Bush got suckered.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Incredible. With all this spinning, who needs P90X?

.

 

[SniperFire]

.

Incredible. With all this spinning, who needs P90X?

.

Any 'spin' here would be those trying to pretend Obama is not CIC and HMFIC.

Is it 'spin' to say NATO did not kill 10's of thousands of civilians in Libya, thanks largely to Obama's support?


Or are you one of those who only wants to count Obama's 'good' kills?

 

[JoeB131]

Not entirely.

The Saudis wanted the US to attack Iraq. They couldn't get Clinton to do it..and they might have done a little bit of work..like reading the PNAC doctrine. That specifically points out that it would take a "Pearl Harbor" like event..for the US to attack Iraq. Bush was motivated but didn't have a reason.

The Fact remains that the Saudis met with the terrorists that did the attack..and possibly funded them. The other facts that are germane were most of the terrorists were Saudi.

And the Saudis own part of FOX.

Bush got suckered.

The Saudis didn't want us attacking Iraq. They didn't even support the invasion, we had to launch it from Kuwait because the Saudis weren't playing along. And understandably so, they knew once Saddam was gone, they'd have a Shi'ite state right on their border, the last thing they wanted.

The rest of your rant is a lot of "Truther" nonsense.

 

[Old Rocks]

Barry can add these to the 40K or so civilians he helped net in Libya!

You know, you have reached the level of fecal material. I am sure that you are capable of reaching lower levels.

 

[SniperFire]

Barry can add these to the 40K or so civilians he helped net in Libya!

You know, you have reached the level of fecal material. I am sure that you are capable of reaching lower levels.

What? Are you saying 10's of thousands of civilians didn't buy it thanks in large part to Obama's NATO bombing campaign?

 

[OtaniKitano]

LOL! Yeah, right. DOn't forget that Bush made sure OBL's family was safely out of the U.S. via privately escorted jets within DAYS of 9/11. That's not third rail information, that's an undisputed fact.

You think you actually have access to OBL's motives through....OUR media? Laughable.

No, I would judge Bin Laden's motives through Bin Ladens own actions and statements.

Although his recent actions are limited to "feeding the fish".

Bin Laden's family has denounced his actions. Many of them have changed their last name.

So what did Bush do? In order to NOT complicate an already tense situation, he got relatives out of harms way.

Or do you think that we should have just let these people, most of them college students, get killed by some bubba-redneck types? That would have gone over well.

I'm not even sure OBL is feeding the fish. I am curious as to why our mainstream media allowed such graphic footage of Gaddafi being captured and sodomized and yet absolutely nothing except "a graphic artist's renderings" of what occurred at the house in Abbottabad.

My H was in Baku, Azerbaijan during 9/11 and for months afterward. One thing we can be sure of: whatever happens, especially in the Middle East, we only get about 10-12% from our press in this country, at best.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Incredible. With all this spinning, who needs P90X?

.

Any 'spin' here would be those trying to pretend Obama is not CIC and HMFIC.

Is it 'spin' to say NATO did not kill 10's of thousands of civilians in Libya, thanks largely to Obama's support?


Or are you one of those who only wants to count Obama's 'good' kills?

Since I'm not a partisan sheep, I get to be honest at all times. I was, I am, and I will continue to be against Obama's actions in Libya. Easy call, zero effort expended.

And thanks for checking pretty much every box on my signature, below. Back to the actual topic: Atrocities like this (and others) would not have happened if Bush hadn't planted us in that sand. Thousands of young Americans would still have their lives; thousands of young Americans would still have their limbs and their minds; thousands of young American families would still have their Dad.

I don't know how how you can do this. And frankly, I don't want to know.

.

 

[Sallow]

Not entirely.

The Saudis wanted the US to attack Iraq. They couldn't get Clinton to do it..and they might have done a little bit of work..like reading the PNAC doctrine. That specifically points out that it would take a "Pearl Harbor" like event..for the US to attack Iraq. Bush was motivated but didn't have a reason.

The Fact remains that the Saudis met with the terrorists that did the attack..and possibly funded them. The other facts that are germane were most of the terrorists were Saudi.

And the Saudis own part of FOX.

Bush got suckered.

The Saudis didn't want us attacking Iraq. They didn't even support the invasion, we had to launch it from Kuwait because the Saudis weren't playing along. And understandably so, they knew once Saddam was gone, they'd have a Shi'ite state right on their border, the last thing they wanted.

The rest of your rant is a lot of "Truther" nonsense.

Not "truther" nonsense...

Omar al-Bayoumi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Saudis have been afraid of Saddam Hussien's ambitions for quite some time. Especially after the Kuwait invasion. By the way, the fact that the Saudis asked for America's help and not Osama Bin Laden's muj boys, really stuck in the guy's craw.

 

[SniperFire]

.

Incredible. With all this spinning, who needs P90X?

.

Any 'spin' here would be those trying to pretend Obama is not CIC and HMFIC.

Is it 'spin' to say NATO did not kill 10's of thousands of civilians in Libya, thanks largely to Obama's support?


Or are you one of those who only wants to count Obama's 'good' kills?

I get to be honest at all times.

.

You strike me as a sheep.