Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
Yes limited, like mag capacity should be.
ROFLMNAO! Why would one want to limit the number of chances it has to destroy that which threatens it without reloading?
Don't tell me you're one of those people who 'believe' that 'NO ONE NEEDS 2 rounds!'
Because only mass shooters and criminals are firing that much. Bullets going all over is a danger to everyone. Defense shouldn't be spraying bullets everywhere. If you can't defend yourself with a 10 rd mag you shouldn't have a gun.
ROFLMNAO!
So ... just to follow you're reasoning here.
You're telling me that you have certain knowledge, that there are "MASS-SHOOTERS" out there, which you KNOW TO BE USING HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES... for the specific purpose of MURDERING INNOCENT PEOPLE...
And YOUR SOLUTION is to limit the number of rounds that INNOCENT PEOPLE CAN LOAD?
What the "#UCK are YOU? Some sort of "MASS-SHOOTER" AGENT? Is it your job to spend your time in debate forums, protecting the interests of sociopaths intent on inflicting mayhem upon the innocent?
I mean seriously, do you truly feel that the product of socialism needs an edge, to the degree that you're prepared to SET THAT EDGE INTO LAW?
Or didn't you get the clue that the products of socialism are ALREADY USING THE EDGE THAT THE LAST BATCH OF LAWS LIMITING WHERE GUNS CAN BE, PROVIDED THEM?
LOL! You people are truly the Hallmark of contributors.
A mass shooter in CA used 10 rd mags because those are what's easy to get in ca.
You have examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense?