Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,077
- 7,302
- 1,938
No I can't. That's because there isn't one.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hope Hicks puts trump sexual incontinence on centre stage.
- Thread starter Tommy Tainant
- Start date
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,077
- 7,302
- 1,938
The 1st Amendment, you fucking idiot...lolWhere in the constitution does it say some crying little bitch named Wild Bill Kelsoe gets to decide what's constitutional?
Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 24,080
- 9,021
- 433
That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.The 1st Amendment, you fucking idiot...lol
You get to have an opinion on the constitution but what is ultimately constitutional is up to the courts.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,419
- 62,675
- 2,645
False, it is relevant, for exactly the reason posted to you the first time you asked a sealion question about it.Nope. Access Hollywood tape is irrelevant. It has no bearing on him sleeping with Daniels, nor him paying her to not talk about it
A defendant does not have a 1st Amend right to opine on criminal charges he is being tried upon. Of course, he has equal access to seeking a protective order if the prosecution uses the media to influence opinion.That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.
You get to have an opinion on the constitution but what is ultimately constitutional is up to the courts.
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,077
- 7,302
- 1,938
It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.
You get to have an opinion on the constitution but what is ultimately constitutional is up to the courts.
Not if your speech compromises a criminal trial. Although, I admit, Bragg's case seems to me to be .... a reach. Unfortunately for Trump, paying off porn stars for sex is legal, but not reporting it as a campaign expenditure is maybe not.It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,077
- 7,302
- 1,938
I wasn't a campaign expenditure. He didn't use campaign funds.Not if your speech compromises a criminal trial. Although, I admit, Bragg's case seems to me to be .... a reach. Unfortunately for Trump, paying off porn stars for sex is legal, but not reporting it as a campaign expenditure is maybe not.
ho ho ho.I wasn't a campaign expenditure. He didn't use campaign funds.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revela
www.politifact.com
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,077
- 7,302
- 1,938
Why isn't Trump charged with failing to report a campaign expenditure?ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revela
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,579
- 3,605
Trump wasn't in the construction business. He failed repeatedly. He wouldn't pay his contractors. He kept losing until he quit and began selling his brand. His success was all in marketing.
Jesus of course he was in construction. You people really need to stop pulling shiola out of your bungholes
Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 19,545
- 19,376
- 2,288
You are a prude Tommy.
âThis was a crisisâ: Hope Hicks testifies about Trump campaign response to Access Hollywood tape â live
Donald Trump’s former communications director testifies that the 2016 campaign wasn’t sure how to respond to Access Hollywood tape, ‘everyone was still absorbing the shock’www.theguardian.com
Its not an edifying sight.
I dont think it bothers his evangelical fans who seem to have strong stomachs.
But it must work on people who dont see trump as Gods envoy.
I think there may be more of the latter and trump needs to win them over in order to win.
Redheaded Stranger
Gold Member
- Mar 6, 2024
- 317
- 126
- 143
Incontinence concerns urination.âThis was a crisisâ: Hope Hicks testifies about Trump campaign response to Access Hollywood tape â live
Donald Trump’s former communications director testifies that the 2016 campaign wasn’t sure how to respond to Access Hollywood tape, ‘everyone was still absorbing the shock’
Its not an edifying sight.
I dont think it bothers his evangelical fans who seem to have strong stomachs.
But it must work on people who dont see trump as Gods envoy.
I think there may be more of the latter and trump needs to win them over in order to win.
The Duke
Diamond Member
- Jul 30, 2022
- 24,925
- 30,113
- 2,288
It's a redredging of a smear campaign that already fizzled, and Daniels owes Trump a lot of money.So is this a criminal trial or a smear campaign?....
So far I haven't heard one crime....
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #175
It can be used in many contexts.Incontinence concerns urination.
he built and renovated buildings. That created jobs, probably thousands over the course of his life.Trump wasn't in the construction business. He failed repeatedly. He wouldn't pay his contractors. He kept losing until he quit and began selling his brand. His success was all in marketing.
It’s irrelevant as is stormy Daniels testimony.False, it is relevant, for exactly the reason posted to you the first time you asked a sealion question about it.
What, exactly, does the access Hollywood tape, or Daniels testimony, have to do with trumps business records?
Regardless of what the access Hollywood tape says about trumps character, it’s irrelevant to this case because this case is about business records, not Trump screwing a porn star.
lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 25,973
- 19,921
- 2,320
So now you're Santa Claus. Well, your replies are full of fiction.ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revela
Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 24,080
- 9,021
- 433
For yourself, emotionally. Not for what constitutes legal action in America. That a court decides.It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.
You link is to a story about Rudy saying it wasn’t campaign funds.ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revela
Similar threads
- Replies
- 420
- Views
- 22K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 149
- Views
- 915
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 209
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8149
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-