Why vote for Biden again?

[progressive hunter]

I don’t find Biden that entertaining although he murdered the blob at the WHCD the other day and has had his way twice with the GOP in the last SOTUs.

I do find it comforting that we’re returning to normal after 4 years of a complete circus from 2017 to 2020. How many Chiefs of Staff did the blob have...like 5?

what you consider normal is debatable,,

 

[Faun]

like unemployment rates that dont include the majority of unemployed people??

I surrender to your supreme intelligence,,

Poor baby.

 

[progressive hunter]

Poor baby.

View attachment 943242

so youre admitting the unemployment rate is fake because it doesnt include the majority of the unemployed,,

thats progress,,

 

[Faun]

what you consider normal is debatable,,

Moans the nut who thinks we have at least a 30% unemployment rate.

 

[Faun]

so youre admitting the unemployment rate is fake because it doesnt include the majority of the unemployed,,

thats progress,,

No, I was trying to educate you on the word, "unemployed." Sadly, you're ineducable.

 

[progressive hunter]

Moans the nut who thinks we have at least a 30% unemployment rate.

it could be higher,, but since the rate doesnt include the majority of those not working we will never know,,

 

[progressive hunter]

No, I was trying to educate you on the word, "unemployed." Sadly, you're ineducable.

it did,, and what the government gives as a rate doesnt include the majority of those not working,,

 

[Faun]

it could be higher,, but since the rate doesnt include the majority of those not working we will never know,,

 

[Faun]

it did,, and what the government gives as a rate doesnt include the majority of those not working,,

Correct, they only include the employed and unemployed in the workforce. You finally got something right.

 

[progressive hunter]

Correct, they only include the employed and unemployed in the workforce. You finally got something right.

if they are unemployed they are not in the work force,,

I am not employed and it doesnt count me,,

 

[Faun]

if they are unemployed they are not in the work force,,

I am not employed and it doesnt count me,,

Of course they are in the workforce as long as they're looking for work.

 

[progressive hunter]

Of course they are in the workforce as long as they're looking for work.

thats not an unemployment number,,

if they change it to a workforce participation number it would make sense,,

 

[Faun]

thats not an unemployment number,,

if they change it to a workforce participation number it would make sense,,

Of course it is. Again, for the dumbed down...

 

[progressive hunter]

Of course it is. Again, for the dumbed down...

according to that definition retired people should be included,,

it says "available" not " actively looking"

disabled people would be included

 

[otto105]

We can post those numbers and those numbers will be positive…… yet they will also be negated by Inflation and govt spend.

Not true.

It’s just more lame excuses from you.

Can you post how many months we have been under 4% unemployment with President Biden.

 

[AntonToo]

Right, Covid had nothing to do with that! Just stop while you are behind, Inflation is the reason more people are taking second jobs!

Yep, same old Heads-I-Win, Tails-You-Lose games.

When it comes to Trump explanation of anything bad in economy is not-Trump.
When it comes to Biden explanation for anything bad is Biden.

I tell you that it was lower labor demand during 2020 that caused less dual-jobs, you say Covid caused it without even realizing that same causality applies to more dual-jobs during Biden.

 

[The Duke]

Poor baby.

View attachment 943242

Hey dumbass; The Biden/Obama Administration definition of "unemployed" means "collecting unemployment benefits".

You should really stop before you embarass yourself further. They only count those collecting benefits as "unemployed".

Now do the labor participation rate.

 

[CowboyTed]

well since you put it that way,,

could you tell us more reasons not to vote trump,,

On the numbers Trump was a pretty shit president...

You judge a president on how did he receive the issues or numbers an how did he leave with them...

Trump was in charge while:
Unemployment rose
Increased Deficit without any major increase GDP
Tax Cuts were implemented but not paid for (and never will)
Massive reduction og US foriegn power world wide especially in soft power
1 million Americans were killed by a virus (Trump said would be gone in two weeks)

Trump on the numbers is bad... Biden has better numbers...

 

[progressive hunter]

On the numbers Trump was a pretty shit president...

You judge a president on how did he receive the issues or numbers an how did he leave with them...

Trump was in charge while:
Unemployment rose
Increased Deficit without any major increase GDP
Tax Cuts were implemented but not paid for (and never will)
Massive reduction og US foriegn power world wide especially in soft power
1 million Americans were killed by a virus (Trump said would be gone in two weeks)

Trump on the numbers is bad... Biden has better numbers...

beings youre a leftwing nutjob youve given me all the reasons to vote for him,,

you guys are his best supporters,,


donald trump thanks you for your support,,

 

[Cougarbear]

That’s a really funny thing for a Trumptard to say

He is twice impeached, indicted on 90+ criminal charges right now and you idiots nominated him anyway over prime aged, capable Republican woman with no baggage.

And, he will be the next President Brandon’s administration is a corrupt third world terror organization attempting to jail their competitors. The independents are understanding this and know the country was in a great place with Trump. The world wasn’t on fire because a red line wasn’t crossed with Trump as President.