Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So why did every citation you provided regarding high profile gag orders include witnesses
Lol Like Cohen having a podcast trashing Trump over the indictment?
His daughter is profiting from this trial - a direct conflict for the judge.
No gloss, you can't cite a single case where the judge has gagged the defendant and the defendant alone.
QED
The judge is responsible for the safety of those in his courtJudges run trials and don’t enact new definitions for words and speech
Truth speaking outside courtroom is never disruption in AmericaThe landmark Supreme Court case, establishing the right of the judge to "gag" a defendant. The only person who was gagged in this example.
A trial judge confronted by a defendant's disruptive conduct can exercise discretion to meet the circumstances of the case, and though no single formula is best for all situations, there are at least three constitutionally permissible approaches for the court's handling of an obstreperous defendant: (1) bind and gag him as a last resort, thereby keeping him present; (2) cite him for criminal or civil contempt;
But the normal world outside your cult doesn't assume trump's lies are true. Sorry.Truth speaking outside courtroom is never disruption in America
people who hate trump? antifa maybe? you know, the same blm thugs who attacked the capital on jan 6 .........Who are these so called terrorist who haven’t done anything so far?
they scared at least 2 jurors off the trump trial and caused many of these working class civil servants to hire security.haven’t done anything so far?
Cloaking it in even newer words like “safety” from the non existent threats and intimidationThe judge is responsible for the safety of those in his court
Ask Mike Pence how powerful Trumps words are
Other than to silence him so he won't expose all of the liberals trying to imprison him for nothing. I asked this question in another thread but I wanted to also make a new thread about it to give more people the chance to answer it. (People on the left mostly.) So, anybody got anything?
You feelers always try to assign responsibility to the other partypeople who hate trump? antifa maybe? you know, the same blm thugs who attacked the capital on jan 6 .........
they scared at least 2 jurors off the trump trial and caused many of these working class civil servants to hire security.
and we can guess who they are by ms danials' testimony of the threats and intimidation that proceeded the blow off.
The goal is to prevent Trump from campaigning and silence him while Dems hit the campaign trail. Can you believe it, in America land of the free that a CORRUPT Dem party would prevent their opponent from even running? Wow just wow!What Reason Would A Gag Order Be Placed On Trump?
Plus they love Hamas!!!The goal is to prevent Trump from campaigning and silence him while Dems hit the campaign trail and spew lies about the guy. Dems already STOLE an election, this is how they are trying to steal another one, prevent their opponent from running.
Yes Democrats are that nasty and vile, lower than human trash!
Yeah WTF to infinity there.Plus they love Hamas!!!
Ok. What Trump can say and can’t say are pretty well known. You can say you are being persecuted. You can’t say the Judge is paid for by Biden to persecute you.
Trump is not prevented from running. Get a grip.The goal is to prevent Trump from campaigning and silence him while Dems hit the campaign trail. Can you believe it, in America land of the free that a CORRUPT Dem party would prevent their opponent from even running? Wow just wow!
Yes Democrats are that nasty and vile, lower than human trash!
LIAR, go wash your filth Dem mouth out with soap. Trump is both GAGGED and incarcerated in a Dem kangaroo court all day long.Trump is not prevented from running. Get a grip.
If had, you would know it says nothing about "Intimidating jurors or witnesses" That is illegal. No gag order necessaryAlready did
Waiting for you guys to do the same
LOL Literally gagging the defendant while he's in the courtroom.The landmark Supreme Court case, establishing the right of the judge to "gag" a defendant. The only person who was gagged in this example.
A trial judge confronted by a defendant's disruptive conduct can exercise discretion to meet the circumstances of the case, and though no single formula is best for all situations, there are at least three constitutionally permissible approaches for the court's handling of an obstreperous defendant: (1) bind and gag him as a last resort, thereby keeping him present; (2) cite him for criminal or civil contempt;
Your insane hatred of Dems is well noted.Result, Americans have learned to distrust and hate Democrats. The attacks on Trump are unamerican. Their attempts to RIG the election by keeping Trump off the ballots. Their attempt to prevent Trump from even campaigning, locking him in a courtroom and gagging him. That's some crazy ass Dem corruption right there.
I openly and proudly hate Democrats, because they are lying nasty scumbags!Your insane hatred of Dems is well noted.
Seek help
Are you paid or for free?
Your brand new act would fit nicely on the payroll
Need any help in applying ?
paranoid much?
