By a jury of his peers, OJ Simpson was innocent.
Yeah...but he murdered two people. Just trying to point out the hypocrisy of the resident racists.
My experience is racists, hate blacks and hispanics, not just one or the other.
Also, the Simpson case was thought to be pretty cut and dry. The Zimmerman case was not so much as Martin was on top Zimmerman and beating him.
Self defense was probable which is a reasonable doubt. Simpson, the DNA evidence was overwhelming.
But Simpson was found not guilty. Why different standards? If he is found not guilty...there should be no question, right? That is the stance of the rabid racists on this forum. Hell, people made the argument that the evidence in Simpson's case was manufactured and tampered with.
As for racists hating nigg3rs and wetbacks...Zimmerman looks pretty white to me...the ******* angle was just a liberal slant. My bet, most of the resident racists wouldn't have cared if Zimmerman looked a bit darker.
I'm not sure what the rabid racist on this board think, however the evidence in the Simpson case was really overwhelming.
One of the reasons that he got off was because of diluted or contaminated DNA samples. DNA samples when diluted or contaminated are less likely to match not more likely to match. So the DNA was a non-issue but the defense team was pretty good.
On Zimmerman's the evidence matched the story.
As far as racists, they will twist and distort the truth to match an agenda. There is no reasoning with people that hate irrationally.