jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,737
- 35,252
- 2,180
They wonât give a loan to over valued property! Youâre nutsYouâre an idiot. They can do a loan for any amount they want.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They wonât give a loan to over valued property! Youâre nutsYouâre an idiot. They can do a loan for any amount they want.
Already explained.He did nothing. No one was damaged, so what damages does he owe?
You need a victim. You better find one because the state isnât it.You don't seem to understand how fines work. Especially in cases like this one.
You don't get to keep your ill gotten gains from fraud. That's a basic staple of our code of law.
Actually, when you break State laws, it is.You need a victim. You better find one because the state isnât it.
Post #?Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
They obviously will.They wonât give a loan to over valued property! Youâre nuts
Point to the law that you canât over estimate property value. There isnât one.Actually, when you break State laws, it is.
The State has standing to sue or to prosecute anyone who breaks State law
This has been explained to you many times.
Not true. You steadfastly refuse to explain your reasoning at every opportunity.Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
Yes they will.They wonât give a loan to over valued property! Youâre nuts
*on sworn financial statements under penalty of lawPoint to the law that you canât over estimate property value. There isnât one.
Explained several times, both by myself and others.Not true. You steadfastly refuse to explain your reasoning at every opportunity.
They are estimates. There is no objective value for any property until it's sold.*on sworn financial statements under penalty of law
(the cultists always forget that part)
There sure is.
This is just getting absurd.
I recommend you read about the case before opening your mouth about it agan.
That's the best defense there is, dumbass.Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
They are sworn statements under penalty of law.They are estimates.
"He didn't do it!" is the worst defense imaginable.That's the best defense there is, .
Youâre beginning to realize how stupid youâve been arenât you.*on sworn financial statements under penalty of law
(the cultists always forget that part)
There sure is.
This is just getting absurd.
I recommend you read about the case before opening your mouth about it agan.
Well that's a hilarious lie.Iâve read the case
Banks donât make loans on sworn statements dumbass. If they do theyâre idiots. Bank do due diligence to determine a properties value before making a loan. They sure as fuck donât just take your word for it.They are sworn statements under penalty of law.
I obviously know more about it than you do. You must have read the democrat crayons and flash cards version.Well that's a hilarious lie.
They absolutely do. Financial statements compiled by reputable firms. Tax returns. You don't know what you are talking about and should probably shut up immediately.Banks donât make loans on sworn statements