Your guide to manmade climate disasters in the world today

[abu afak]

NASA thinks plants love more CO2 in the air, why do you hate CO2 so much, did they steal one of your biscuits? ...... Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study
LINK

You Dishonest POS #1
There is no question, in General and to a limit, CO2 helps plant life.
But YOUR NASA LINK Continues!

"....While rising Carbon Dioxide concentrations in the air Can be Beneficial for Plants, it is also the Chief Culprit of Climate Change. The gas, which Traps Heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been Increasing since the Industrial age due to the Burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach Concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years.
The impacts of climate change include Global Warming, Rising Sea Levels, Melting Glaciers and Sea Ice as well as more Severe Weather events.

The beneficial impacts of Carbon Dioxide on plants may also be Limited, said co-author Dr. Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Gif-suv-Yvette, France. “Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”

“While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia. Canadell added that while the models represent the best possible simulation of Earth system components, they are continually being improved."""
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Sunsettommy's Link!
Now you see why this Low Life HAD to put me on 'Ignore.' (more likely Lying since he sees my posts IAC.)
He's dishonest, loses Every debate, and like Reigny, He Could Not/Would Not lay out his AGW position either.
`

 

[abu afak]

Carbon pollution only kills humans ... the rest of the planet rejoices ... see how wildlife thrives in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone? ... no humans ... we're the last diseased bud on a dying branch of the Tree of Life ... an evolutionary dead end ... we shouldn't be as selfish as the dinosaurs and make God destroy 7/8's the planet surface ...

YOU are a FRAUD who just seeks to dump as many Physics Terms you can into your pointless chatter.

And like Sunsettommy Who had to 'Ignore' me BECAUSE he also can't, (and I called him on it 5 or 6 times too), You Cannot and have Not laid out your position on AGW (or Not) lest you lose your Status/Wanted Persona of a RWer.

What is your position on AGW you FRAUD?
Tell all the Dumbbells you post with.

`

 

[Sunsettommy]

What I post was 100% factually true and that upset you.....

================

"NASA thinks plants love more CO2 in the air, why do you hate CO2 so much, did they steal one of your biscuits?

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States."

=================

You are being profoundly dishonest because that was, all I stated.

 

[Sunsettommy]

This is todays reality:

 

[abu afak]

What I post was 100% factually true and that upset you.....

"NASA thinks plants love more CO2 in the air, why do you hate CO2 so much, did they steal one of your biscuits?

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States."

=================

You are being profoundly dishonest because that was, all I stated.

NASA thinks plants love more CO2 in the air, why do you hate CO2 so much, did they steal one of your biscuits? ...... Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study
LINK

You Repost, I Repost. You're just Re-outed.
You Dishonest POS #1
There is no question, in General and to a limit, CO2 helps plant life.
But YOUR NASA LINK Continues!

"....While rising Carbon Dioxide concentrations in the air Can be Beneficial for Plants, it is also the Chief Culprit of Climate Change. The gas, which Traps Heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been Increasing since the Industrial age due to the Burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach Concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years.
The impacts of climate change include Global Warming, Rising Sea Levels, Melting Glaciers and Sea Ice as well as more Severe Weather events.

The beneficial impacts of Carbon Dioxide on plants may also be Limited, said co-author Dr. Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Gif-suv-Yvette, France. “Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”

“While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia. Canadell added that while the models represent the best possible simulation of Earth system components, they are continually being improved."""
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Sunsettommy's Link!
Now you see why this Low Life HAD to put me on 'Ignore.' (more likely Lying since he sees my posts IAC.)
He's dishonest, loses Every debate, and like Reigny, He Could Not/Would Not lay out his AGW position either.
Now in fact you see he is LYING about 'Ignore' too!
`

 

[jc456]

You Dishonest POS #1
There is no question, in General and to a limit, CO2 helps plant life.
But YOUR NASA LINK Continues!

"....While rising Carbon Dioxide concentrations in the air Can be Beneficial for Plants, it is also the Chief Culprit of Climate Change. The gas, which Traps Heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been Increasing since the Industrial age due to the Burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach Concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years.
The impacts of climate change include Global Warming, Rising Sea Levels, Melting Glaciers and Sea Ice as well as more Severe Weather events.

The beneficial impacts of Carbon Dioxide on plants may also be Limited, said co-author Dr. Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Gif-suv-Yvette, France. “Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”

“While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia. Canadell added that while the models represent the best possible simulation of Earth system components, they are continually being improved."""
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Sunsettommy's Link!
Now you see why this Low Life HAD to put me on 'Ignore.' (more likely Lying since he sees my posts IAC.)
He's dishonest, loses Every debate, and like Reigny, He Could Not/Would Not lay out his AGW position either.
`

why didn't you comment on the actual post you replied to? weird.

 

[jc456]

You Repost, I Repost. You're just Re-outed.
You Dishonest POS #1
There is no question, in General and to a limit, CO2 helps plant life.
But YOUR NASA LINK Continues!

"....While rising Carbon Dioxide concentrations in the air Can be Beneficial for Plants, it is also the Chief Culprit of Climate Change. The gas, which Traps Heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been Increasing since the Industrial age due to the Burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach Concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years.
The impacts of climate change include Global Warming, Rising Sea Levels, Melting Glaciers and Sea Ice as well as more Severe Weather events.

The beneficial impacts of Carbon Dioxide on plants may also be Limited, said co-author Dr. Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Gif-suv-Yvette, France. “Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”

“While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia. Canadell added that while the models represent the best possible simulation of Earth system components, they are continually being improved."""
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Sunsettommy's Link!
Now you see why this Low Life HAD to put me on 'Ignore.' (more likely Lying since he sees my posts IAC.)
He's dishonest, loses Every debate, and like Reigny, He Could Not/Would Not lay out his AGW position either.
Now in fact you see he is LYING about 'Ignore' too!
`

again, why do you want to kill plants that supply our oxygen? Weird.

If CO2 scares you so much, there's an out for you.

 

[ReinyDays]

YOU are a FRAUD who just seeks to dump as many Physics Terms you can into your pointless chatter.

And like Sunsettommy Who had to 'Ignore' me BECAUSE he also can't, (and I called him on it 5 or 6 times too), You Cannot and have Not laid out your position on AGW (or Not) lest you lose your Status/Wanted Persona of a RWer.

What is your position on AGW you FRAUD?
Tell all the Dumbbells you post with.

`

I know ... college science ...

1] I agree with global warming ... we're 1ºC above our 20th Century average ...
2] Humans contribute to this effect ... "how much" hasn't been measured yet ...
3] The warming will have a net positive effect on all life systems ... one or two degrees of warming lets biochemistry proceed faster ... especially among primary producers ... according to Arrhenius equation - Wikipedia ...

Oh ... sorry ... change "primary producer" to plants ... and I've written the Queen of Sweden to change Svante August Arrhenius's name to Bill, or Tom, for you ...

How much dumber do I need to make this? ... and keep screaming little child, otherwise I won't hear you ...

 

[jc456]

Oh ... sorry ... change "primary producer" to plants ... and I've written the Queen of Sweden to change Svante August Arrhenius's name to Bill, or Tom,

Anything but Sue!

 

[Matted Joybeard]

CO2 is such a trace gas that it cannot do anything when it comes to warming but suddenly it's a critical plant food we cannot have enough of and we are greening the world with it.

 

[jc456]

CO2 is such a trace gas that it cannot do anything when it comes to warming but suddenly it's a critical plant food we cannot have enough of and we are greening the world with it.

prove it does any warming. It's that simple. go for it. We know for fact that CO2 under 150 PPM the planet dies. We know that. We also know the more CO2, the more greening. More greening means more oxygen for guess who?

 

[ReinyDays]

prove it does any warming. It's that simple. go for it. We know for fact that CO2 under 150 PPM the planet dies. We know that. We also know the more CO2, the more greening. More greening means more oxygen for guess who?

Plenty of YouTube videos show this ... albeit at 1,000,000 ppm ... using simple ratios, we should see 0.0006ºC increase at 150 ppm extra ...

The other 0.9994ºC rise is from other sources ... like deforestation, UHI effect ... and most textbooks list 20 to 25 natural causes for temperature change ...

 

[abu afak]

I know ... college science ...

1] I agree with global warming ... we're 1ºC above our 20th Century average ...

AI Overview
In 2024, global average land and ocean surface temperature was 2.32 degrees Fahrenheit (1.29 degrees Celsius) above the 20th-century average.
This was the highest global temperature on record since the 1850-2024 climate record began.

2] Humans contribute to this effect ... "how much" hasn't been measured yet ...

""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

In addition, fossil fuels are the Only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere.
That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old.

These and other lines of evidence leave No Doubt that Fossil fuels are the Primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

dev-04-drupal-climate.woc.noaa.gov

3] The warming will have a net positive effect on all life systems ... one or two degrees of warming lets biochemistry proceed faster ... especially among primary producers ... according to Arrhenius equation - Wikipedia ...

AI Overview

The Arrhenius equation, a formula describing the temperature dependence of reaction rates, is not directly applicable to global warming in the same way as it is to chemical kinetics. However, it's relevant in understanding the underlying greenhouse effect and how it contributes to global warming. Svante Arrhenius, who proposed the Arrhenius equation, also first predicted the warming effect of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).

Here's how Arrhenius and global warming are connected:

• Arrhenius's Prediction:
  Arrhenius's work in the late 19th century demonstrated that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would trap more outgoing radiation, leading to a warming effect. While his calculations were based on limited data and made assumptions, they laid the groundwork for the modern understanding of the greenhouse effect.

Oh ... sorry ... change "primary producer" to plants ... and I've written the Queen of Sweden to change Svante August Arrhenius's name to Bill, or Tom, for you ...

How much dumber do I need to make this? ... and keep screaming little child, otherwise I won't hear you ...

Speeding up reactions is Not necessarily a positive any more than concommitantly speeding up Sea Level Rise.


YOU are a STILL A FRAUD who just seeks to Dump as many Physics Terms you can into your pointless chatter.
Arrenenius is UNNECESSARY to understand the issue we are discussing.

And like Sunsettommy Who had to 'Ignore' me BECAUSE he also can't, (and I called him on it 5 or 6 times too), You Cannot and have Not laid out your position on AGW (or Not) lest you lose your Status/Wanted Persona of a RWer.

Your position on AGW is Wrong and you necessarily diluted and hid the facts with subterfuge/deflection.


`

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

There is absolutely no evidence the warming in the last 225 years is 100-200 (nice range DURR) times faster.

And what does that even mean? It took 22500-45000 years for the Earth to warm as much? LOL!

Hilarious!

 

[jc456]

There is absolutely no evidence the warming in the last 225 years is 100-200 (nice range DURR) times faster.

And what does that even mean? It took 22500-45000 years for the Earth to warm as much? LOL!

Hilarious!

Must have really good engines to go that fast LOL

 

[ReinyDays]

AI Overview

Ah ... you don't think ... AI is all the intelligence you can muster ...

Garbage in ... garbage out ...

 

[BackAgain]

You Dishonest POS #1
There is no question, in General and to a limit, CO2 helps plant life.
But YOUR NASA LINK Continues!

"....While rising Carbon Dioxide concentrations in the air Can be Beneficial for Plants, it is also the Chief Culprit of Climate Change. The gas, which Traps Heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been Increasing since the Industrial age due to the Burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach Concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years.
The impacts of climate change include Global Warming, Rising Sea Levels, Melting Glaciers and Sea Ice as well as more Severe Weather events.

The beneficial impacts of Carbon Dioxide on plants may also be Limited, said co-author Dr. Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Gif-suv-Yvette, France. “Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”

“While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia. Canadell added that while the models represent the best possible simulation of Earth system components, they are continually being improved."""
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Sunsettommy's Link!
Now you see why this Low Life HAD to put me on 'Ignore.' (more likely Lying since he sees my posts IAC.)
He's dishonest, loses Every debate, and like Reigny, He Could Not/Would Not lay out his AGW position either.
`

Babu believes that nonsense.

 

[ding]

AI Overview
In 2024, global average land and ocean surface temperature was 2.32 degrees Fahrenheit (1.29 degrees Celsius) above the 20th-century average.
This was the highest global temperature on record since the 1850-2024 climate record began.



""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

In addition, fossil fuels are the Only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere.
That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old.

These and other lines of evidence leave No Doubt that Fossil fuels are the Primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

dev-04-drupal-climate.woc.noaa.gov

AI Overview

The Arrhenius equation, a formula describing the temperature dependence of reaction rates, is not directly applicable to global warming in the same way as it is to chemical kinetics. However, it's relevant in understanding the underlying greenhouse effect and how it contributes to global warming. Svante Arrhenius, who proposed the Arrhenius equation, also first predicted the warming effect of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).

Here's how Arrhenius and global warming are connected:

• Arrhenius's Prediction:
  Arrhenius's work in the late 19th century demonstrated that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would trap more outgoing radiation, leading to a warming effect. While his calculations were based on limited data and made assumptions, they laid the groundwork for the modern understanding of the greenhouse effect.

Speeding up reactions is Not necessarily a positive any more than concommitantly speeding up Sea Level Rise.


YOU are a STILL A FRAUD who just seeks to Dump as many Physics Terms you can into your pointless chatter.
Arrenenius is UNNECESSARY to understand the issue we are discussing.

And like Sunsettommy Who had to 'Ignore' me BECAUSE he also can't, (and I called him on it 5 or 6 times too), You Cannot and have Not laid out your position on AGW (or Not) lest you lose your Status/Wanted Persona of a RWer.

Your position on AGW is Wrong and you necessarily diluted and hid the facts with subterfuge/deflection.


`

So you are saying the planet is behaving perfectly normal for an interglacial period?

 

[abu afak]

So you are saying the planet is behaving perfectly normal for an interglacial period?

Classic !!
Why just yesteday...

EDIT: Note the NO Rebutttal post of the denier Troll 'ding.'
He writes One line or dumps an Irrelevant Graph.
He has No Real Game and is Non-conversant except in the Religion section. Stay there Boy.

`

 

[jc456]

Classic !!
Why just yesteday...

`