Not nearly as notorious as flimsy excuses (like that one).
Coming from a believer in the flimsy ID fabrication!
If I thought for one moment you could be honest in your research and assessments I might spend the time. You will only accept the eye witness testimony (of a cop and professional social service worker) when it may be in your favor.
As is "give it time" when it comes to life evolving into unbelievable order and complexity without the aid of an intelligent designer.
Zero evidence for the existence of your imaginary "intelligent designer".
Plenty of evidence for the evolution of life from single forms into more complex forms.
The Bush appointed judge in the Dover, PA court ruled that ID "evolved" from bogus "creation science" which has been thoroughly debunked and discredited.
Judge Rules Intelligent Design Can t Be Taught in Class
As far as ID is concerned:
From Richard Dawson's book The Blind Watchmaker: "
"Natural selection is the blind watchmaker, blind because it does not see ahead, does not plan consequences, has no purpose in view. Yet the living results of natural selection overwhelmingly impress us with the appearance of design as if by a master watchmaker, impress us with the illusion of design and planning.”
"the illusion of design." But of course. Whatever it takes to pretend it was pure luck.
Who cares what some judge rules about classrooms?
If someone wants to believe that some micro-organism with no intelligence, no will, no design --- given enough time managed to build itself a spine, a nervous system, a liver, some wings, an eyeball and brain --- all without the slightest conscious thought --- then who are we to think that kind of “believer” might have some epiphany one day?