"You didn't get there on your own"

[OODA_Loop]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

My truth is getting up and working hard to feed my family.

It has been harder and harder to do that under Obama.

Out of the two choices there really is nothing to lose with Romeny.

It can only get better.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

My truth is getting up and working hard to feed my family.

It has been harder and harder to do that under Obama.

Out of the two choices there really is nothing to lose with Romeny.

It can only get better.

Under Papa Obama's policies for the middle class

Work two jobs
so someone else does not have to work

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith

1) capitalism is really selfish in that it makes you serve others with the best price and quality in the entire world or go bankrupt.

2) "On praising communism (or, "socialism with tears"), Galbraith was without peer among intellectuals. For example, who can forget his infamous 1984 quote that the communist system in the former Soviet Union was superior to capitalism because, according to Galbraith, the communists somehow made better and more efficient use of its "manpower" than did the West? Indeed, to the very end, Galbraith was a socialist impersonating an economist."


See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow, very slow!!! Is any other conclusion possible???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

if its merely dogma it ought to be easy to refute; why not defeat its central principle right now or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so.

 

[Bfgrn]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

My truth is getting up and working hard to feed my family.

It has been harder and harder to do that under Obama.

Out of the two choices there really is nothing to lose with Romeny.

It can only get better.

You have a lot to lose. But the people I am most concerned about are the people in this nation who can't get up and work hard anymore or not yet. It is something I just can't understand about conservatives. As a liberal, I do not support lazy people collecting government checks. I have never heard a liberal support laziness. But THOSE people are a minority and they are are not the ones who will be hurt the most by cutting, eliminating or privatizing social programs.

 

[Bfgrn]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

if its merely dogma it ought to be easy to refute; why not defeat its central principle right now or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so.

That's what I've been doing ed, and you continue your ignorant drone.

 

[Neotrotsky]

"You didn't get there on your own"

Solyndra

 

[Bfgrn]

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith

1) capitalism is really selfish in that it makes you serve others with the best price and quality in the entire world or go bankrupt.

2) "On praising communism (or, "socialism with tears"), Galbraith was without peer among intellectuals. For example, who can forget his infamous 1984 quote that the communist system in the former Soviet Union was superior to capitalism because, according to Galbraith, the communists somehow made better and more efficient use of its "manpower" than did the West? Indeed, to the very end, Galbraith was a socialist impersonating an economist."


See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow, very slow!!! Is any other conclusion possible???

Where is a link there ed, or is plagiarism part of your lack of honesty?

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man, and had President Kennedy lived, Galbraith would have been the driving force behind withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965 (as JFK planned) instead of LBJ's Americanization of the war, escalation that led to the deaths of 60,000 American soldiers.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I am most concerned about are the people in this nation

you're a morality bigot!! You think you are morally superior but have no reason

I have never heard a liberal support laziness.

too stupid!!!! When Newt forced Clinton to "end welfare as we know it" by making folks work a little for their money 86% suddenly disappeared!!!!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man, and had President Kennedy lived, Galbraith would have been the driving force behind withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965 (as JFK planned) instead of LBJ's Americanization of the war, escalation that led to the deaths of 60,000 American soldiers.

so???? a lot got killed fighting Hitler too? Does the liberal embrace all of America's enemies? Is that why the liberal spied for Stalin?

 

[Neotrotsky]

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man, and had President Kennedy lived, Galbraith would have been the driving force behind withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965 (as JFK planned) instead of LBJ's Americanization of the war, escalation that led to the deaths of 60,000 American soldiers.

so???? a lot got killed fighting Hitler too? Does the liberal embrace all of America's enemies? Is that why the liberal spied for Stalin?

Using the Left's "logic"
it must have been "conservative liberals" who spied for the communists



More bad attempts by the left to cover for the horrific failures of the Left

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man,

"On praising communism (or, "socialism with tears"), Galbraith was without peer among intellectuals. For example, who can forget his infamous 1984 quote that the communist system in the former Soviet Union was superior to capitalism because, according to Galbraith, the communists somehow made better and more efficient use of its "manpower" than did the West? Indeed, to the very end, Galbraith was a socialist impersonating an economist."

"the goal of socialism is communism"- Lenin


See why we are positive a liberal will be just plain slow!!!! Do you ever say anything that doesn't immediately make you look very very slow?? FYI the Soviet Union fell long ago having never achieved more than 30% of our per capita GDP, and that was after stealing everything from the west to copy. How old are you??

 

[Bfgrn]

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man, and had President Kennedy lived, Galbraith would have been the driving force behind withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965 (as JFK planned) instead of LBJ's Americanization of the war, escalation that led to the deaths of 60,000 American soldiers.

so???? a lot got killed fighting Hitler too? Does the liberal embrace all of America's enemies? Is that why the liberal spied for Stalin?

How low can you go there ed. Galbraith was not a spy for Stalin.

If you want to get to know Stalin's comrades, take a close look at the biggest backers of the tea party.

A People’s History of Koch Industries: How Stalin Funded the Tea Party Movement

Everyone knows that Tea Party revolutionaries fear and hate socialism about as much as the Antichrist. Which is funny, because the Tea Party movement’s dirty little secret is that it owes its existence to the grandaddy of all Antichrists: the godless empire of the USSR.

What few realize is that the secretive oil billionaires of the Koch family, the main supporters of the right-wing groups that orchestrated the Tea Party movement, would not have the means to bankroll their favorite causes had it not been for the pile of money the family made working for the Bolsheviks in the late 1920s and early 1930s, building refineries, training Communist engineers and laying down the foundation of Soviet oil infrastructure.

The comrades were good to the Kochs.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

[
How low can you go there ed. Galbraith was not a spy for Stalin.

If I said he was I'll pay you $10,000. Bet??? or run away again with your liberal tail between your legs. Bet??? Feel foolish??

 

[Neotrotsky]

John Kenneth Galbraith was a brilliant man, and had President Kennedy lived, Galbraith would have been the driving force behind withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965 (as JFK planned) instead of LBJ's Americanization of the war, escalation that led to the deaths of 60,000 American soldiers.

so???? a lot got killed fighting Hitler too? Does the liberal embrace all of America's enemies? Is that why the liberal spied for Stalin?

How low can you go there ed. Galbraith was not a spy for Stalin.

If you want to get to know Stalin's comrades, take a close look at the biggest backers of the tea party.

A People’s History of Koch Industries: How Stalin Funded the Tea Party Movement

Everyone knows that Tea Party revolutionaries fear and hate socialism about as much as the Antichrist. Which is funny, because the Tea Party movement’s dirty little secret is that it owes its existence to the grandaddy of all Antichrists: the godless empire of the USSR.

What few realize is that the secretive oil billionaires of the Koch family, the main supporters of the right-wing groups that orchestrated the Tea Party movement, would not have the means to bankroll their favorite causes had it not been for the pile of money the family made working for the Bolsheviks in the late 1920s and early 1930s, building refineries, training Communist engineers and laying down the foundation of Soviet oil infrastructure.

The comrades were good to the Kochs.

Soros Jewish family was good to the Nazis

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

the Tea Party movement’s dirty little secret is that it owes its existence to the grandaddy of all Antichrists: the godless empire of the USSR.

1) its not true

2) if it was so what??? Modern Germany owes its existence to Nazi Germany


see why we say, slow???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

if its merely dogma it ought to be easy to refute; why not defeat its central principle right now or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so.

That's what I've been doing ed, and you continue your ignorant drone.[/QUOTE]

Why be so afraid to give us your best example of defeating our founders central principle??? What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character.

 

[Foxfyre]

Yea, you folks wouldn't want any facts or truth to disturb your dogma, doctrinaire or parroting script...

My truth is getting up and working hard to feed my family.

It has been harder and harder to do that under Obama.

Out of the two choices there really is nothing to lose with Romeny.

It can only get better.

Under Papa Obama's policies for the middle class

Work two jobs
so someone else does not have to work

After all it isn't you working those jobs. We're all in this together to make it possible for you to work those two jobs so someone else doesn't have to work.

 

[Bfgrn]

if its merely dogma it ought to be easy to refute; why not defeat its central principle right now or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so.

That's what I've been doing ed, and you continue your ignorant drone.

Why be so afraid to give us your best example of defeating our founders central principle??? What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character.[/QUOTE]

Our founder's seminal achievement on this planet can be expressed in one word. It is not corporation, it is not privatization, and it is not marketism...

It is government.

"The equal rights of man, and the happiness of every individual, are now acknowledged to be the only legitimate objects of government. Modern times have the signal advantage, too, of having discovered the only device by which these rights can be secured, to wit: government by the people, acting not in person, but by representatives chosen by themselves, that is to say, by every man of ripe years and sane mind, who contributes either by his purse or person to the support of his country." --Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823. ME 15:482

 

[Listening]

if its merely dogma it ought to be easy to refute; why not defeat its central principle right now or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so.

That's what I've been doing ed, and you continue your ignorant drone.

Why be so afraid to give us your best example of defeating our founders central principle??? What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character.

Our founder's seminal achievement on this planet can be expressed in one word. It is not corporation, it is not privatization, and it is not marketism...

It is government.

"The equal rights of man, and the happiness of every individual, are now acknowledged to be the only legitimate objects of government. Modern times have the signal advantage, too, of having discovered the only device by which these rights can be secured, to wit: government by the people, acting not in person, but by representatives chosen by themselves, that is to say, by every man of ripe years and sane mind, who contributes either by his purse or person to the support of his country." --Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823. ME 15:482[/QUOTE]

A Republic.

A limited or restricted federal government.

That is what they gave us.

The only issue is that you bastards don't seem to understand what restricted means.

You'd have Uncle Sam changing your depends if you could.