Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You ‘Locally Owe Allegiance’ in Bizarre Birthright Citiz

[Hollie]

We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You 'Locally Owe Allegiance' in Bizarre Birthright Citizenship Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.

 

[MarathonMike]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice. Ms Brown is a complete embarrassment to the Court.

 

[Hollie]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice. Ms Brown is a complete embarrassment to the Court.

She has feelings of guilt for stealing wallets.

 

[Muhammed]

The Democrats did this to embarrass America.

It's the same reason they put ridiculous moonbat trannies in high places. It makes the USA a laughing stock in other countries.

 

[Winston]

We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You 'Locally Owe Allegiance' in Bizarre Birthright Citizenship Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.

Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.

 

[Hollie]

Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.

Oh my, the DIE hire groupie has hurt feelings. Did you check your pockets to see if your wallet is still there?

 

[Cassandro]

Was she confusing allegiance with jurisdiction? One benefit of her meanderings may be that other Justices may not want her to concur with their decisions.

 

[Hollie]

Was she confusing allegiance with jurisdiction?

She was yelling out the dangers of democrat DIE policies.

 

[MisterBeale]

Here we are folks, the judicial reasoning of a judge that has no idea what a woman is.

 

[MarathonMike]

The Democrats did this to embarrass America.

It's the same reason they put ridiculous moonbat trannies in high places. It makes the USA a laughing stock in other countries.

That makes sense. Since Democrats are the anti-American Party, there are many ways to undermine the greatness of America.

 

[Seymour Flops]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice. Ms Brown is a complete embarrassment to the Court.

Sure there are. But the left values controllability far more than qualifications.

 

[Hollie]

Here we are folks, the judicial reasoning of a judge that has no idea what a woman is.

I’m not clear that she can define, “what is a wallet”?

 

[Winston]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice. Ms Brown is a complete embarrassment to the Court.

I mean I got to tell you. Jumping on this damn beat Jackson bandwagon clearly reflects how ignorant you people are. Ignorant to the case, ignorant to the argument, ignorant of the law. I mean I am seeing it everywhere, not just that damn Gateway pundit. Every right wing nut job with a mouthpiece is crowing about it, and like I said, just screaming out ignorance.

The argument the administration is attempting to make is that children born to non-citizens are not citizens because their PARENTS owe an allegiance to another country. That flies in the face of everything. As Sotomayer quickly pointed out, now citizenship would be dependent on the status of the parent, not the child. That is backwards and not the way it has worked since before the American Revolution. Not the way it worked in common English law for five hundred ******* YEARS.

And the whole jurisdiction problem cannot be ignored. Jackson was right to point it out, although Sotomayer did first. She corrected the administrations attorney, Japan does not have jurisdiction over a Japanese citizen tourist while they are on American soil. That defeats the administration's entire argument.

 

[Hollie]

Here we are folks, the judicial reasoning of a judge that has no idea what a woman is.

Wow, that was “you know” a cavalcade of “you know’s” from a DIE hire slug.

 

[Winston]

Was she confusing allegiance with jurisdiction? One benefit of her meanderings may be that other Justices may not want her to concur with their decisions.

Come on. The OP claims there can be no jurisdiction without allegiance? Seriously, that is the claim and that is a the core of the governments argument here.

 

[MisterBeale]

Wow, that was “you know” a cavalcade of “you know’s” from a DIE hire slug.

SO, I wanted to post this to the thread, and I went to C-Span's Youtube page. . . they have a few other of their C-span clips from this case on there, but not this snippet. . . ??? I wonder why.

I had to go to Rumble, and the folks that posted it up there were Gateway.


The establishment knows what it is doing.

 

[Hollie]

I mean I got to tell you. Jumping on this damn beat Jackson bandwagon clearly reflects how ignorant you people are. Ignorant to the case, ignorant to the argument, ignorant of the law. I mean I am seeing it everywhere, not just that damn Gateway pundit. Every right wing nut job with a mouthpiece is crowing about it, and like I said, just screaming out ignorance.

The argument the administration is attempting to make is that children born to non-citizens are not citizens because their PARENTS owe an allegiance to another country. That flies in the face of everything. As Sotomayer quickly pointed out, now citizenship would be dependent on the status of the parent, not the child. That is backwards and not the way it has worked since before the American Revolution. Not the way it worked in common English law for five hundred ******* YEARS.

And the whole jurisdiction problem cannot be ignored. Jackson was right to point it out, although Sotomayer did first. She corrected the administrations attorney, Japan does not have jurisdiction over a Japanese citizen tourist while they are on American soil. That defeats the administration's entire argument.

Your application for a DIE hire seat to replace Jackson is, you know, denied. Give Jackson her wallet back and declare your allegiance to, you know, petty theft.

 

[excalibur]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice. Ms Brown is a complete embarrassment to the Court.

I doubt there were dozens.

 

[Hollie]

Come on. The OP claims there can be no jurisdiction without allegiance? Seriously, that is the claim and that is a the core of the governments argument here.

That was, you know, a complete misrepresentation of you know, the core argument. Did you report your stolen wallet to the Ketanji Brown police? I’m not sure what the area code is for Japan but email Jackson for the number.

 

[Winston]

For the love of all that is holy.

1. If Jackson steals a wallet, while visiting Japan, for whatever damn reason, can Japan arrest her, charge her, and try her? And screw Japan, make it China. Hell, Afghanistan if you want, Taliban got her, she wasn't wearing a Burka, or whatever. Who has jurisdiction in each of these cases? I mean damn, if tourist are not under the jurisdiction of the countries they are in, then why would we warn people visiting Saudi Arabia or Dubai? Why even bother to follow their laws and their customs. They have no "jurisdiction".

2. Flip it around, as Sotamayer did. Can Japan come to the United States and arrest a Japanese citizen, on US soil, for a crime committed in Japan? Hell no, they can't even arrest them in the US embassy IN Japan. And the reverse works the same.

Look, I don't know how those on the right do it. I mean it makes my head hurt. The absolute cognitive dissonance, and that is on the slight chance they even halfway understand. For instance, within the last 48 hours we have heard about some Homeland Security big wheel that likes to go to Colombia and Thailand for sex vacations with hookers. Openly brags about it to the point that it is sexual harassment. But hey, no problem those on the right say.

See, prostitution is legal in Colombia and Thailand. Those countries had, wait for it, JURISDICTION, so no big deal. And those on the right can post that in that thread, and then post the exact opposite in this thread, and not skip a damn beat.