The difference is that liberals are capable of civility, intellectual discussion, honest disagreement. I was a Kav supporter right up until he invoked the Clintons in his partisan address last week. I still think he will be a fair justice up until there are political overtones to a case. The outrage from my liberal colleagues was minimum. We regularly see what cons do to their own when they cross the aisle and it isn’t civil in the least.
You guys falsely accused him of gang rape. Many of you still are. That’s a civil intellectual discussion?
you don't know if it was false.
besides....you guys accused hillary of selling babies out of pizza ships. is THAT a civil intellectual discussion?
here's a typical discussion I have with cons....
me: i support gay rights
cons: you fkn ***....why do you hate America?
me: i'd love to see affordable education and health care like in norway and finland
cons: so you want complete socialism like venezuela.....ya fkn libernazidemocrap......
me: I don't want the christian religion dictating laws in the USA
cons: so you hate gods and christians! you stinking devil worshipper!
me:I believe MOST muslims (like most christians) are not terrorists.
cons: you filthy terrorist loving piece of shit....
When cons start debating LOGICALLY and CIVILLY with me I will gladly reciprocate.....