You Are Supporting A Convicted Felon for President, Stop Talking About Illegal Immigrants and Crimes

[daveman]

Give it up already. The lawfare crusade to keep Trump from winning failed, and so there is no purpose to keeping up the charade. These cases are meaningless and will all be dropped.

Laffy Taffy will keep bangin' on this until his handler tells him to stop. He's very obedient.

 

[lafayette]

Haha of course it’s a a federal level. The scotus has appealette jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional issues

It of course won’t get there as the NY appeals courts will overturn the verdict

Not a chance.

 

[lafayette]

Not the NY case.

 

[Lisa558]

Not the NY case.

It was a convulated case twisted around to turn an expired misdemeanor into multiple felonies in an obvious and desperate attempt to brand Trump a convicted felon and hurt his chances for reelection.

People saw it for what it was, the malicious prosecution failed, and both Bragg and Merchan shoukdld be disbarred.

As far as Lucretia DeJames, the bitch should be disbarred for the same thing - twisting around a repaid loan where there was no victim and fining Trump $500 million.

Liberals should not be allowed to get away with these North Korean tactics.

 

[lafayette]

Lisa, the NY supreme court will reject your argument.

 

[Lisa558]

Lisa, the NY supreme court will reject your argument.

If they do, that’s because they’re a bunch of biased leftists, and it will go up to the SCOTUS, who will make the proper ruling.

 

[struth]

Not a chance.

agreed, it will be overturned by the NY appealette Courts before it needs to go to SCOTUS.

 

[DBA]

Do not talk about crime when you're voting for a convicted felon.

Why would someone that has no problem with people that commit crimes(illegals) have an issue with people voting for a convicted felon?

By the way, Trump will have no felonies on his record shortly. Taking 1 misdemeanor and twisting the law to get 32 felonies out of it was preposterous.

 

[DBA]

Lisa, the NY supreme court will reject your argument.

No non-partisan court would uphold the ruling against Trump. None.

 

[Lisa558]

No non-partisan court would uphold the ruling against Trump. None.

Of course. The question is how partisan the NY Supreme Court is.

 

[lafayette]

agreed, it will be overturned by the NY appealette Courts before it needs to go to SCOTUS.

Not those courts.

 

[lafayette]

No non-partisan court would uphold the ruling against Trump. None.

Of course they would.

 

[struth]

Not those courts.

Disagree

The appealette courts in NY aren’t beholden to politics in NYC

 

[DBA]

Of course they would.

Nope. You shall see. The trial itself was not legit in that the judge allowed evidence that should not have been allowed, the judge essentially coached the jury to the verdict and the judge had personal conflicts. All of this plus the legal hoops they jumped through to elevate a misdemeanor into 34 felonies with no precedent.

I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for this verdict to stand.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Innocent people get convicted all the time, especially by demklan DA’s in places like NYC

Trump is America’s Mandela

More like America's new Capone. A lawless shit bag.

 

[BackAgain]

Idiotic thread original poster and the thread headline itself don’t seem able to grasp that Trump has never been convicted of any crime.

 

[lafayette]

 

[kyzr]

Idiotic thread original poster and the thread headline itself don’t seem able to grasp that Trump has never been convicted of any crime.

They can't point to their record of disaster after disaster, so they make "Lawfare" their big talking point.
Abortion seems to have played out, men have higher priorities, like affording food.
Trump needs to appeal to the USSC and get all the illegal "convictions" dropped.

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 1046844

We just did remove one. You twit.

 

[lafayette]

Disagree

The appealette courts in NY aren’t beholden to politics in NYC

Watch.