WW1 303 British SMLE No. 1 Mk III

JGalt

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
85,262
Reaction score
113,254
Points
3,635
My wife and I went to a couple city-wide garage sales today and I picked up a World War 1 era Enfield SMLE (Short Magazine Lee-Enfield) No. 1 Mk III rifle. It's in fairly good condition with matching serial numbers except for the cocking handle. The stock is all intact but it appears to have been refinished in the original hand-rubbed oil.

I disassembled it, brushed the dust out of the parts, and gave it a thin coat of CLP. The rifling and throat are in good condition, and just needed and bore swab with oil and a brass brush. The rifle has a Century Arms, Vermont import mark on it, as do many European battle rifles imported during the 1960's. I ran five rounds of commercial ammo through it and it functioned just fine. The only problem is that out of all the handloads I have in British 303, they were loaded for another rifle that has a worn throat. Therefore I had to load the rounds a little long to place the bullet nearly touching the rifling. I'll work up some handloads for this specific rifle at some later point, since it's in better condition.

I'm not really sure when this was made, or the manufacturer, and the last number of the date on the left side is worn. It appears to be "191-something." AI says that five-digit serial number beginning and ending with a "2" and no letter prefix would have likely been manufactured by BSA in 1906 or 1907 but like I said earlier, the first three numbers of the date stamp are "191." Lithgow (Australia) also used prefix-less 5-digit numbers and their first 30,000 rifles were primarily produced between 1913 and 1914.

Incidentally, I gave $130 for it. What a deal.


smle1.webp

smle2.webp

smle3.webp

smle4.webp

smle5.webp

smle6.webp
 
My wife and I went to a couple city-wide garage sales today and I picked up a World War 1 era Enfield SMLE (Short Magazine Lee-Enfield) No. 1 Mk III rifle. It's in fairly good condition with matching serial numbers except for the cocking handle. The stock is all intact but it appears to have been refinished in the original hand-rubbed oil.

I disassembled it, brushed the dust out of the parts, and gave it a thin coat of CLP. The rifling and throat are in good condition, and just needed and bore swab with oil and a brass brush. The rifle has a Century Arms, Vermont import mark on it, as do many European battle rifles imported during the 1960's. I ran five rounds of commercial ammo through it and it functioned just fine. The only problem is that out of all the handloads I have in British 303, they were loaded for another rifle that has a worn throat. Therefore I had to load the rounds a little long to place the bullet nearly touching the rifling. I'll work up some handloads for this specific rifle at some later point, since it's in better condition.

I'm not really sure when this was made, or the manufacturer, and the last number of the date on the left side is worn. It appears to be "191-something." AI says that five-digit serial number beginning and ending with a "2" and no letter prefix would have likely been manufactured by BSA in 1906 or 1907 but like I said earlier, the first three numbers of the date stamp are "191." Lithgow (Australia) also used prefix-less 5-digit numbers and their first 30,000 rifles were primarily produced between 1913 and 1914.

Incidentally, I gave $130 for it. What a deal.


View attachment 1250493
View attachment 1250494
View attachment 1250495
View attachment 1250496
View attachment 1250498
View attachment 1250499
Nice
 
Solid $500-$600 rifle in this market. Anything on the ID plate?

If it's kosher it should have at least a broad arrow marking. If it blank it's likely a repro and done by whoever refinished the stock.

Most of the buttstocks, during the refurb process, had a thin piece of wood glued in place covering where the ID plate was but it always looks like ass so most folks (myself included) just pull the wood and put in a disk.
 
My wife and I went to a couple city-wide garage sales today and I picked up a World War 1 era Enfield SMLE (Short Magazine Lee-Enfield) No. 1 Mk III rifle. It's in fairly good condition with matching serial numbers except for the cocking handle. The stock is all intact but it appears to have been refinished in the original hand-rubbed oil.

I disassembled it, brushed the dust out of the parts, and gave it a thin coat of CLP. The rifling and throat are in good condition, and just needed and bore swab with oil and a brass brush. The rifle has a Century Arms, Vermont import mark on it, as do many European battle rifles imported during the 1960's. I ran five rounds of commercial ammo through it and it functioned just fine. The only problem is that out of all the handloads I have in British 303, they were loaded for another rifle that has a worn throat. Therefore I had to load the rounds a little long to place the bullet nearly touching the rifling. I'll work up some handloads for this specific rifle at some later point, since it's in better condition.

I'm not really sure when this was made, or the manufacturer, and the last number of the date on the left side is worn. It appears to be "191-something." AI says that five-digit serial number beginning and ending with a "2" and no letter prefix would have likely been manufactured by BSA in 1906 or 1907 but like I said earlier, the first three numbers of the date stamp are "191." Lithgow (Australia) also used prefix-less 5-digit numbers and their first 30,000 rifles were primarily produced between 1913 and 1914.

Incidentally, I gave $130 for it. What a deal.


View attachment 1250493
View attachment 1250494
View attachment 1250495
View attachment 1250496
View attachment 1250498
View attachment 1250499
You lucky sumbitch. What a great find!
 
My wife and I went to a couple city-wide garage sales today and I picked up a World War 1 era Enfield SMLE (Short Magazine Lee-Enfield) No. 1 Mk III rifle. It's in fairly good condition with matching serial numbers except for the cocking handle. The stock is all intact but it appears to have been refinished in the original hand-rubbed oil.

I disassembled it, brushed the dust out of the parts, and gave it a thin coat of CLP. The rifling and throat are in good condition, and just needed and bore swab with oil and a brass brush. The rifle has a Century Arms, Vermont import mark on it, as do many European battle rifles imported during the 1960's. I ran five rounds of commercial ammo through it and it functioned just fine. The only problem is that out of all the handloads I have in British 303, they were loaded for another rifle that has a worn throat. Therefore I had to load the rounds a little long to place the bullet nearly touching the rifling. I'll work up some handloads for this specific rifle at some later point, since it's in better condition.

I'm not really sure when this was made, or the manufacturer, and the last number of the date on the left side is worn. It appears to be "191-something." AI says that five-digit serial number beginning and ending with a "2" and no letter prefix would have likely been manufactured by BSA in 1906 or 1907 but like I said earlier, the first three numbers of the date stamp are "191." Lithgow (Australia) also used prefix-less 5-digit numbers and their first 30,000 rifles were primarily produced between 1913 and 1914.

Incidentally, I gave $130 for it. What a deal.


View attachment 1250493
View attachment 1250494
View attachment 1250495
View attachment 1250496
View attachment 1250498
View attachment 1250499



Did you consult with Ilhan Omar first? That might be one of those Mark One Hundred and Elevens!
 
My wife and I went to a couple city-wide garage sales today and I picked up a World War 1 era Enfield SMLE (Short Magazine Lee-Enfield) No. 1 Mk III rifle. It's in fairly good condition with matching serial numbers except for the cocking handle. The stock is all intact but it appears to have been refinished in the original hand-rubbed oil.

I disassembled it, brushed the dust out of the parts, and gave it a thin coat of CLP. The rifling and throat are in good condition, and just needed and bore swab with oil and a brass brush. The rifle has a Century Arms, Vermont import mark on it, as do many European battle rifles imported during the 1960's. I ran five rounds of commercial ammo through it and it functioned just fine. The only problem is that out of all the handloads I have in British 303, they were loaded for another rifle that has a worn throat. Therefore I had to load the rounds a little long to place the bullet nearly touching the rifling. I'll work up some handloads for this specific rifle at some later point, since it's in better condition.

I'm not really sure when this was made, or the manufacturer, and the last number of the date on the left side is worn. It appears to be "191-something." AI says that five-digit serial number beginning and ending with a "2" and no letter prefix would have likely been manufactured by BSA in 1906 or 1907 but like I said earlier, the first three numbers of the date stamp are "191." Lithgow (Australia) also used prefix-less 5-digit numbers and their first 30,000 rifles were primarily produced between 1913 and 1914.

Incidentally, I gave $130 for it. What a deal.


View attachment 1250493
View attachment 1250494
View attachment 1250495
View attachment 1250496
View attachment 1250498
View attachment 1250499
Nice gun.
No 1 Mk III? I got one of those, does not look that nice.
No barrel wood, either. I don't need to shoot it it, just keep it maintained and look at it.
Bullets so old, you pull the trigger, the firing pin hits, and like a second and a half later it pops off. :auiqs.jpg:
Pssst-Pow! Yeah, I don't wanna clean it after that. It's corrosive ammo.
Original stuff. It's fairly accurate, and I think I might have some fresh factory ammo for it, too, not much. Not that invested in it. It looks nice and is neat.
It's not an '03 Springfield. This is that British stuff.
 
Last edited:
I just checked, mine has a sporterized stock and very nice sights on it.
Also no bolt and magazine because cousin's kids were coming and I never put it all back. Crazy kids comin', I gimped every gun around.
 
Solid $500-$600 rifle in this market. Anything on the ID plate?

If it's kosher it should have at least a broad arrow marking. If it blank it's likely a repro and done by whoever refinished the stock.

Most of the buttstocks, during the refurb process, had a thin piece of wood glued in place covering where the ID plate was but it always looks like ass so most folks (myself included) just pull the wood and put in a disk.

I removed the ID plate screw to see if whoever refinished the stock had flipped it over. But the plate was solidly stuck in there, so I didn't try to pry it out for fear of marring it or chipping the wood.
 
I removed the ID plate screw to see if whoever refinished the stock had flipped it over. But the plate was solidly stuck in there, so I didn't try to pry it out for fear of marring it or chipping the wood.
They are beveled so they only go in one way, any markings would be on the side that is currently up.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom