Not responding to anything else until you tell us HOW they pulled it off; the thermite, the bombs planted, the supposed drones being used, planting the light poles, etc....
Summon some manhood and tell us how....your why doesn't mean jack shit unless you say how.
Get busy boy.
Why don't you explain HOW the Muslim terrorists pulled off the conspiracy theory you subscribe to?
It is explained in the 9/11 Commission Report. They pulled knives, claimed they had bombs in some cases to control the passengers while their co-conspirators flew the planes into buildings. You've never read the report have you? Other wise you could quote some of it.
Seriously your demand is a fucking joke
No, the demand was made to a fucking joke though (that would be you if I'm moving too fast for you). I have asked you to explain what happened since you swear the 9/11 Commission Report is incorrect.
and just another one of your excuses to NOT respond, because the OCT is so fucking absurd.
See, there you go again; you call the Commission report "absurd" but refuse to say what in the report is "absurd".
You demand a complete hypothesis from an average person,
NO DIPSHIT...YOU'RE FUCKING LYING.. I never asked you for a complete hypothesis...not fucking once!
I asked you to explain in reasonable detail how they pulled it off. You're so used to ducking the question, you don't even read the question.
but not one from the US government or its agencies. At least we who question and point out the BS of the OCT have the balls and manhood to do so, unlike some pussy who goes by the screen name of "Candycorn".
No what you do is make allegations and half truths and suppositions.
This thread is about remote guided spy craft. A while back, it was and still is suggested that the maneuvers by the "hijackers" were highly unlikely, given the admitted lack of training on commercial aircraft. This observation has been made by expert pilots, and has been well documented, and covered. It has also been theorized, that remote guidance systems on the attacking planes could have been used on that day.
Yes...AND THE FUCKING PLANE CRASHED. EXACTLY WHAT THE EXPERT THINKS WOULD HAPPEN YOU IDIOT!
Many like you, suggested back then that this technology did not exist in 2001.
Never made that suggestion.
Because information collected after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 has raised questions about the alleged ability and motivation of the people accused of piloting Boeing 757 and 767 planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, speculation has since lingered regarding the covert use of technology to precisely self-navigate all 4 airliners into targets that day.
Yes and the phone calls proves such speculation a completely absurd proposition in every way shape and form.
Government and aviation industry publications shed light on the development and implementation of pre-9-11 state-of-the-art systems capable of facilitating precise automated navigation of the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft used during the 9/11 attacks, to a given destination.
Plane hijackings were extremely rare in the US before 9-11 due to adequate security, including the Air Force domestic air defense system. However, on 9-11, none of the commandeered planes sent out any alarms that they were being hijacked. If the planes were actually equipped with remote control technologies - which are not theoretical at all it would have been easy to ensure the transponders would be automatically turned off once the external controllers "hijacked" the plane, and they were.
Now we see why you're hesitant to post what you think happened...because you sound like a moron....
So "they" remote guided the planes and faked the phone calls now?
None of this was ever mentioned in your precious 9-11 Omission Report.
Yes because it was factual and not the comic book you're trying to write. Dumbass.
That is why the 9-11 Report is in many minds nothing more then a cover up, and lies by OMISSION. Instead you fall back like the pussy you are, to the "correct on all the major points" BS
Yet you cannot quote a single inaccuracy in the report. I heard that the original version was printed on Kevlar since it is so bulletproof.
You can't argue these things, in any rational way so you try to take anyone questioning or debating this topic on a fruit loop ride of fallacies, and demand a complete mapquest of the 9-11 attacks, knowing full well that is impossible for starters, and 2ndly, knowing full well your own governments OCT falls short of doing what you demand of others.
Okay...give us a partial explanation of how these bombs were planted in the building with nobody noticing, how the bombs were set off since radio signals didn't work as was proven by the FDNY firefighters who perished, how none of the charges were thrown clear by planes hitting the buildings even though jet engines went several hundred feet....start there sonny.
This last technology is FTS, for Flight Termination System, was pioneered by SPS International, System Planning Corporation, whose CEO in 2001 was Dov Zakheim. SPC is a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the Flight Termination System. Zakheim was appointed the Pentagon's chief financial officer by Bush and this was his position at the time $2.3 trillion was announced missing from the Defense Department on the day before 9/11/2001. Zakheim was also a member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), and one of the signers of both a letter to Bill Clinton in 1998 urging the overthrow of Saddam by force, and PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses," which recognized such an invasion might be impossible unless the U.S. got a "new Pearl Harbor." Other signers of these documents were Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld.
This is one of my favorite of your type's lunacy. Let me get this straight; the administration announced the "missing" (it was an announcement about a new inventory system that could better track inventory) then decided it would blow up the building to destroy the records by hijacking a plane and crashing it into the Pentagon.
You have the market cornered on absurdity.
The connections with PNAC, and the contributors of this series of white papers, up to the remote guidance technology is too strong to just wave off, as just another coincidence, but your 9-11 Omission Report does just that, on many occasions, so much so that even those that sat on the Commission have made disparaging statements about their own findings, and how they did not succeed in accomplishing their own mission statement.
A remote controlled shuttle or spy plane should not be of any great surprise to anyone, and neither should the possibility that the planes used to attack America on 9-11 were compromised in this manner as well.
Again fuck you, your "major points" cowardice and especially your treasonous acquiescence to the MFKERS you are responsible for attacking my country and covering up the truth. May you and them rot in hell.
"You can't argue these things, in any rational way". Still waiting for you to explain "how". We all know you can't.
You deserve neither freedom nor security, and your care taker needs to put you in a time out. I challenge you to post anything more then one paragraph long, with something germane to the issues being discussed here, that doesn't resemble a 1st graders homework.
