eots
no fly list
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXbBSm8tMmk]9/11 - NIST FOIA WTC7 Collapse including Penthouse.(with audio) - YouTube[/ame]
Discuss...
Discuss...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NIST is either mistaken or flat out lying.
I would have to agree
NIST is either mistaken or flat out lying.
I would have to agree
I agree too. In my opinion, the portion of the building above the fire, unaffected by heat, should have retained structural integrity enough to fallover still intact (somewhat) to the side, not having been pulverized as we see here.
I digress, but similarly, in the case of WTC I and II, I would say the portion of the buildings below the fire, should have had enough structural integrity to create resistance would that have deflected the falling portion of the building off to the side.
I would have to agree
I agree too. In my opinion, the portion of the building above the fire, unaffected by heat, should have retained structural integrity enough to fallover still intact (somewhat) to the side, not having been pulverized as we see here.
I digress, but similarly, in the case of WTC I and II, I would say the portion of the buildings below the fire, should have had enough structural integrity to create resistance would that have deflected the falling portion of the building off to the side.
that would seem logical..
I agree too. In my opinion, the portion of the building above the fire, unaffected by heat, should have retained structural integrity enough to fallover still intact (somewhat) to the side, not having been pulverized as we see here.
I digress, but similarly, in the case of WTC I and II, I would say the portion of the buildings below the fire, should have had enough structural integrity to create resistance would that have deflected the falling portion of the building off to the side.
that would seem logical..
right? After what we KNOW about the Gulf of Tonkin being faked which resulted in the death of 58,000 americans during the Vietnam War, why does it seem so far-fetched that the government has some hand in this? If you see the world in terms of corporations and not countries, it becomes easier to imagine I think.
NIST is either mistaken or flat out lying.
I would have to agree
I agree too. In my opinion, the portion of the building above the fire, unaffected by heat, should have retained structural integrity enough to fallover still intact (somewhat) to the side, not having been pulverized as we see here.
I digress, but similarly, in the case of WTC I and II, I would say the portion of the buildings below the fire, should have had enough structural integrity to create resistance would that have deflected the falling portion of the building off to the side.
Perhaps a bit of context is needed.
Imagine your place of business on Anystreet in Anytown, USA. Across the street are two buildings; two of the largest in the world. Suddenly there is a jumbo jet crash into one of the buildings. Then a few minutes later is a second jumbo jet crash. An hour later one of the buildings collapses sending debris all over the place...including tons of rubble being sent into your place of business. Next the second building collapses sending even more crap into your building.
Four major events have taken place right across the street. There is seismic activity from the events themselves, pyro phenomenon from fires caused by jet fuel that sent flames into your buildings, countless secondary and tertiary explosions from gas tanks in vehicles that were involved in the flames and pressure explosions due to unimaginable forces.
It is impossible to calculate the stresses WTC 7 was under on that day.
I would have to agree
I agree too. In my opinion, the portion of the building above the fire, unaffected by heat, should have retained structural integrity enough to fallover still intact (somewhat) to the side, not having been pulverized as we see here.
I digress, but similarly, in the case of WTC I and II, I would say the portion of the buildings below the fire, should have had enough structural integrity to create resistance would that have deflected the falling portion of the building off to the side.
that would seem logical..
right? After what we KNOW about the Gulf of Tonkin being faked which resulted in the death of 58,000 americans during the Vietnam War, why does it seem so far-fetched that the government has some hand in this? If you see the world in terms of corporations and not countries, it becomes easier to imagine I think.