how about facts such as the impossibility of the airliners actually being real airliners....
Um, that's not a 'fact'. That's just you ignore overwhelming evidence again. See, you keep confusing your own willful ignorance with evidence. And they aren't the same thing.
the fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at FREE FALL acceleration .
More problems: the building began its collapse about 19 seconds before you admit it began. The penthouse began collapsing into the WTC 7 long before the facade fell. And fully plummeted into the center of the WTC 7 about 6 to 7 seconds the facade fell. Demonstrating undeniably and unambiguously that the structure of the WTC 7 was collapsing long before the facade fell.
And you ignore it all, pretending it never happened. Rendering your 'impossible' yet another case of your own hapless denial.
And of course, there are the litany of reasons why the bomb theory comically fails. Epically and utterly. Yet you predictably ignore them all, can't resolve any of them, won't question any portion of your conspiracy, and won't think too hard about it. Any one of these issues renders your conspiracy ludicrously unlikely. And you can't resolve any of them.
... the fact that three steel framed buildings WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed while other buildings in the same complex were damaged but not destroyed.
WTC 1, 2 and 7 were by far the largest, being 110 stories, 110 stories and 47 stories respectively. The tallest building in the WTC plaza after WTC 7 was only 9 stories tall. All high rise structures fell. None of the low rise structures did.
Which, of course, you know. But really hope we don't.
what about the total lack of documentary evidence in the form of photographs of the site with time/date & location info for each pix?
There were pictures and video galore taken. You simply ignore any of it that doesn't match your conspiracy. There's a stark difference between photos not being taken and you *ignoring* the photos that were taken. You can't tell the difference.
We can. Remember, and this point is very important: you don't know what you're talking about. You're simply repeating debunked conspiracy theories verbatim without actually doing any research.
what about the total lack of accounting for any of the 4 aircraft, how much of ea aircraft was recovered and if so, how was that documented?
Who says there was a 'total lack of accounting'? You do, citing yourself. And your source sucks, as you don't know what you're talking about. Here's a page dedicated to flight 93 complete with flight recorders, flight path studies, gallery of photos of debris from the NTSB and Department of Justice.
Sources and Detailed Information - Flight 93 National Memorial U.S. National Park Service
But there was a 'total lack of accounting', huh? You're clueless.
Yet you didn't know about them because you've never did the authorities test for incendiaries or explosives at ground zero, and if so, how is that documented?
THINK! before it becomes illegal!
Dust samples at the WTC were tested. There was no residue of explosives, incendiaries or any of the other compounds your conspiracy relies upon. This in an analysis so thorough and precise that it was able to detect prescription medication from the WTC pharmacy. But not your thousands upon thousand upon thousands of bombs or incediary devices?
Um, no.
And 'think'?
You won't question your own conspiracy. You refuse to think about any of the conspiracy crippling holes in your claims.
1) There were uncontrolled fires within the WTC 7. This eliminates even the possibility of the use of explosive demolition.....as an system of demolition would have also been on fire. Charges would have detonated or been reduced to bubbling pools of popping goo, wires connecting the charges would have been destroyed, timers or transmitters or receivers would have been destroyed.
2) Worse, the collapse of WTC 7 initiated in virtual silence. And there are no such thing as 'silent explosives'.
3) There were no girders cut in a manner consistent with explosive demolition. Oh, there were twisted girders. There were deformed girders. But there were no
cut girders. And explosive demolition would have produced thousands upon thousands of them.
4) There was no residue of explosives in dust samples taken from ground zero. This in an analysis so precise it detected medication from the WTC pharmacy. But not the thousands and thousands of charges used to bring the buildling down?
5) There was never any apparatus of explosives ever found before during or after the collapse. Not one charge, not one inch of blasting wire, not one transmitter, not one cutter, kicker, not anything. These buildings weren't museums. They were regularly used, inspected, cleaned, maintained. There is essentially zero chance that the thousands and thousands of bombs would have been missed. Especially when....
6) The WTC plaza was inspected by the port authority bomb squad only a week before the collapse. Neither they nor their bomb sniffing dogs found even one charge. Despite your theory requiring thousands and thousands.
7) The FDNY correctly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 fire and structural damage hours before it came down. They measured its slow structural failure, its leaning, bulging and buckling. They put a transit on the building and by the afternoon were reasonably certain that it was coming down from the fires. Fires which grew hotter as the day went on.
8) There was an investigation by the NIST. And they determined that the FDNY was correct: it was fire that brought the building down.
Not only can't you resolve any of these conspiracy killing inconsistencies between your claims and reality,
you refuse to address them, or even acknowledge they exist. You're not a thinker. You're a mindless repeater. And you're reciting the conspiracy narrative you've been told to think without thought or question.
No thank you, Truther. Your story is just an awful explanation. And even you can't make it work.
