Wow. Ron Paul wasn't kidding about letting people die!

[The Infidel]

So not paying someone's hospital bill after they die=you like the idea of letting someone die?



What type of medication causes a brain to spill out these things?

If that were the case we'd all be under attack.

I dont think paying for their bills equates how much you love someone.... besides, Ron coouldnt pay his bills... he'd have to do it for everybody then.


That makes terrible sense Sallow.

 

[manifold]

All you rabid, partisan dipshits are in such a hurry to shit all over each other that you've overlooked the fundamental truth in this story: An uninsured man was in fact NOT denied medical attention due to his inability to pay for it.

And as an aside, this fact also demonstrates the fucktardian disingenuousness of the thread title.

 

[The Infidel]

No.

You were asking about my hero. My only hero is my Dad.

As for the other stuff...ridiculous.

This was a man that worked for him, with no insurance and his medical bills might bankrupt his family.

Paul doesn't give a shit.

Tax payers got it..not him or charity.

I see, this makes perfect sense.

You have a moral issue with Dr. Paul who has a history of giving free medical care to financially poor mothers because you have proof he didn't pay for one of his campaign worker's medical bills.

You have no issue with Obama who's never paid any of his campaign workers hospital bills and has never done anything in his personal life to help anyone with medical care.


We're now letting our partisanship control our moral compass, scary stuff for some people.

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

No.... you are wrong!

Ron believes in self reliance.... what is wrong with that?

He cant pay everyones bills...... MY GOD get a brain dude!





Still love ya like a brother, but your just flat wrong on this one.

 

[The Infidel]

All you rabid, partisan dipshits are in such a hurry to shit all over each other that you've overlooked the fundamental truth in this story: An uninsured man was in fact NOT denied medical attention due to his inability to pay for it.

And as an aside, this fact also demonstrates the fucktardian disingenuousness of the thread title.

Details details.....

 

[Dr.Drock]

No.

You were asking about my hero. My only hero is my Dad.

As for the other stuff...ridiculous.

This was a man that worked for him, with no insurance and his medical bills might bankrupt his family.

Paul doesn't give a shit.

Tax payers got it..not him or charity.

I see, this makes perfect sense.

You have a moral issue with Dr. Paul who has a history of giving free medical care to financially poor mothers because you have proof he didn't pay for one of his campaign worker's medical bills.

You have no issue with Obama who's never paid any of his campaign workers hospital bills and has never done anything in his personal life to help anyone with medical care.


We're now letting our partisanship control our moral compass, scary stuff for some people.

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

You take no moral issue with a man who's never personally done anything to help someone with their individual medical situation, and you're disgusted by a man who gives free medical care to poor mothers.

Why? The first person mentioned is democrat, the second person mentioned is a republican.

 

[manifold]

All you rabid, partisan dipshits are in such a hurry to shit all over each other that you've overlooked the fundamental truth in this story: An uninsured man was in fact NOT denied medical attention due to his inability to pay for it.

And as an aside, this fact also demonstrates the fucktardian disingenuousness of the thread title.

Apologies to kwc57, as he/she did in fact mention this already. I somehow missed it.

 

[Conservative]

No.

You were asking about my hero. My only hero is my Dad.

As for the other stuff...ridiculous.

This was a man that worked for him, with no insurance and his medical bills might bankrupt his family.

Paul doesn't give a shit.

Tax payers got it..not him or charity.

Prove Paul did not assist the guy financially. Prove he didn't give a shit.

You can't, as that is speculation on your part, you lying sack of shit.

 

[Conservative]

No.

You were asking about my hero. My only hero is my Dad.

As for the other stuff...ridiculous.

This was a man that worked for him, with no insurance and his medical bills might bankrupt his family.

Paul doesn't give a shit.

Tax payers got it..not him or charity.

I see, this makes perfect sense.

You have a moral issue with Dr. Paul who has a history of giving free medical care to financially poor mothers because you have proof he didn't pay for one of his campaign worker's medical bills.

You have no issue with Obama who's never paid any of his campaign workers hospital bills and has never done anything in his personal life to help anyone with medical care.


We're now letting our partisanship control our moral compass, scary stuff for some people.

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

letting charity organizations handle the payment of a case like this is cruel, short sighted and delusional?

I think that last word fits you way more than it fits Paul.

 

[Conservative]

I see, this makes perfect sense.

You have a moral issue with Dr. Paul who has a history of giving free medical care to financially poor mothers because you have proof he didn't pay for one of his campaign worker's medical bills.

You have no issue with Obama who's never paid any of his campaign workers hospital bills and has never done anything in his personal life to help anyone with medical care.


We're now letting our partisanship control our moral compass, scary stuff for some people.

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

You take no moral issue with a man who's never personally done anything to help someone with their individual medical situation, and you're disgusted by a man who gives free medical care to poor mothers.

Why? The first person mentioned is democrat, the second person mentioned is a republican.

best post in the thread.

 

[Sallow]

I see, this makes perfect sense.

You have a moral issue with Dr. Paul who has a history of giving free medical care to financially poor mothers because you have proof he didn't pay for one of his campaign worker's medical bills.

You have no issue with Obama who's never paid any of his campaign workers hospital bills and has never done anything in his personal life to help anyone with medical care.


We're now letting our partisanship control our moral compass, scary stuff for some people.

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

letting charity organizations handle the payment of a case like this is cruel, short sighted and delusional?

I think that last word fits you way more than it fits Paul.

This ain't about me. My name isn't in the title. I'm not running for anything.

This is about Ron Paul. Focus.

 

[The Infidel]

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

You take no moral issue with a man who's never personally done anything to help someone with their individual medical situation, and you're disgusted by a man who gives free medical care to poor mothers.

Why? The first person mentioned is democrat, the second person mentioned is a republican.

best post in the thread.

 

[Conservative]

My moral compass?

I ain't the one running for president, Ron Paul is..

And what he advocates for is cruel, short sighted and somewhat delusional.

letting charity organizations handle the payment of a case like this is cruel, short sighted and delusional?

I think that last word fits you way more than it fits Paul.

This ain't about me. My name isn't in the title. I'm not running for anything.

This is about Ron Paul. Focus.

was they guy denied medical care? No.
did he die because of a lack of medical care? No.
Is Sallow a fucking moron who cannot admit what a partisan douche he really is? yes.

 

[Sallow]

No.

You were asking about my hero. My only hero is my Dad.

As for the other stuff...ridiculous.

This was a man that worked for him, with no insurance and his medical bills might bankrupt his family.

Paul doesn't give a shit.

Tax payers got it..not him or charity.

Prove Paul did not assist the guy financially. Prove he didn't give a shit.

You can't, as that is speculation on your part, you lying sack of shit.

Going by what's written in the article. It makes no mention of that.

If you have anything else to add in..I suggest you do a little work and add it.

 

[Sallow]

letting charity organizations handle the payment of a case like this is cruel, short sighted and delusional?

I think that last word fits you way more than it fits Paul.

This ain't about me. My name isn't in the title. I'm not running for anything.

This is about Ron Paul. Focus.

was they guy denied medical care? No.
did he die because of a lack of medical care? No.
Is Sallow a fucking moron who cannot admit what a partisan douche he really is? yes.

The last vestiage of a losing argument.

Personal insults.

Grats.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That's low, even for a Democrat.

I keep thinking they hit bottom, of it's only a ledge and they slide further down the Laurentian Abyss of poor taste.

You're such a creep dude. Don't act high horse, you're the biggest hypocrit of evaaa

Feel free to post anything I ever wrote that's even remotely comparable

 

[Sallow]

Did I read that right?

Swallow is whining about someone's morals?

That's some funny shit. Mr Amoral criticizing someone else's lack of morals.

Hiya NaziGirl!

 

[manifold]

This ain't about me. My name isn't in the title. I'm not running for anything.

This is about Ron Paul. Focus.

was they guy denied medical care? No.
did he die because of a lack of medical care? No.
Is Sallow a fucking moron who cannot admit what a partisan douche he really is? yes.

The last vestiage of a losing argument.

Personal insults.

Grats.

Actually, only his third point is the personal insult. The first two are all that really matters in this story, and you're transparently avoiding it.

 

[G.T.]

That's low, even for a Democrat.

I keep thinking they hit bottom, of it's only a ledge and they slide further down the Laurentian Abyss of poor taste.

You're such a creep dude. Don't act high horse, you're the biggest hypocrit of evaaa

Feel free to post anything I ever wrote that's even remotely comparable

I don't have to, you'll post it for me.

 

[Sallow]

That's low, even for a Democrat.

I keep thinking they hit bottom, of it's only a ledge and they slide further down the Laurentian Abyss of poor taste.

You're such a creep dude. Don't act high horse, you're the biggest hypocrit of evaaa

Feel free to post anything I ever wrote that's even remotely comparable

Aw shit, really?

You map Obama to Marxism all the time..for a start.

 

[G.T.]

You're such a creep dude. Don't act high horse, you're the biggest hypocrit of evaaa

Feel free to post anything I ever wrote that's even remotely comparable

Aw shit, really?

You map Obama to Marxism all the time..for a start.

Get real though, Sallow. You're devolving my dude.

This story has nothing to do with what your thread title implies it does, dogfather.