Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
nope never have. more proof that you are a dumb ass!
You stick to crack cocaine, then?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nope never have. more proof that you are a dumb ass!
wrong again! speed drugs were never my style!
besides me doing drugs or drinking to excess are no excuse for your dumbfuckery...
as I'm not confused nor have any of the listed complaints.. the confusion is all yourswrong again! speed drugs were never my style!
besides me doing drugs or drinking to excess are no excuse for your dumbfuckery...
I think you've got your dumbfucks mixed up, sparky.
The question is the root cause of your confusion: drink, drugs, head injury, or perhaps a birth defect?
no need to..denial at it's finest!
try posting actual evidence to back up your quip.
Please explain why there are no marks on the wall, how the damage was low when the fence was high, where all the large aircraft parts were and so on.
It's all been explained you just don't like the answer.
Back at you Dawgshit..denial at it's finest!
mr ignorance speaks.no need to..try posting actual evidence to back up your quip.
Please explain why there are no marks on the wall, how the damage was low when the fence was high, where all the large aircraft parts were and so on.
It's all been explained you just don't like the answer.
Back at you Dawgshit..denial at it's finest!
as I'm not confused nor have any of the listed complaints.. the confusion is all yours
now might be a good time to back out gracefully....
I'm so glad you posted that to back up my position.
A small aircraft, travelling at a far greater speed and hitting an object designed to absorb impact, left debris but a larger aircraft left a hole in a wall that was too small for the aircraft to fit into.
mr hubris rears his mis shapen head.as I'm not confused nor have any of the listed complaints.. the confusion is all yours
now might be a good time to back out gracefully....
ROFL
Ah daws, ever the arrogant moron.
The problem with you is that you operate from an ad hominem perspective. Since I've spanked you in the past, you view me as the enemy, never grasping that you are arguing the same side of the question as I.
Thus my conclusion that you are drunk, stoned, or simply stupid.
I'm politically Conservative (Note the large "C and don't hate anyone.
Please quote any post of mine where I support communists or hatred towards Jews.
When you've finished searching and can't find one, an apology will be accepted.
You've been in this forum for what, about 4 months? In that time you have posted radical left and now you are here blaming DA JOOOZZZ for 9/11 with Nazi propaganda.
Fucking moron.
I'm so glad you posted that to back up my position.
A small aircraft, travelling at a far greater speed and hitting an object designed to absorb impact, left debris but a larger aircraft left a hole in a wall that was too small for the aircraft to fit into.
What are you babbling about? The only thing on that F4 that wasn't vaporized was the wing tips that stuck out to far to make solid contact with the wall. A reinforced concrete wall to simulate what is around a nuclear reactor. And let me remind you the 2 planes were traveling at about the same speed and the one that hit the reinforced wall of the pentagon had probably 5 times or more the amount of gas in it's tanks.....
You crack me up.........
You really don't read all that well, do you?
I'm about as radical left as Maggie Thatcher and I'm saying there is more to 9/11 than meets the eye.
I'm unsure who did what but there may have been Israeli involvement.
What is for sure - there is far more to the story than the official version.
Yeah those crafty Muslim Jihadists, knowing precisely when to attack during the terror drills, and suspending the laws of physics in Manhattan. Terror drills on 7-7 in the London tubes as well. Ever wonder how they knew all of this?? Probably not...You really don't read all that well, do you?
I'm about as radical left as Maggie Thatcher and I'm saying there is more to 9/11 than meets the eye.
I'm unsure who did what but there may have been Israeli involvement.
What is for sure - there is far more to the story than the official version.
The "truth" of 9/11 is just Muslims being Muslims.
Mohammad Atta and the boys murdered Kafir for the glory of the sleazy pig djin, Allah.
still spewing that steaming pile about suspending, breaking,bending the laws of physics !Yeah those crafty Muslim Jihadists, knowing precisely when to attack during the terror drills, and suspending the laws of physics in Manhattan. Terror drills on 7-7 in the London tubes as well. Ever wonder how they knew all of this?? Probably not...You really don't read all that well, do you?
I'm about as radical left as Maggie Thatcher and I'm saying there is more to 9/11 than meets the eye.
I'm unsure who did what but there may have been Israeli involvement.
What is for sure - there is far more to the story than the official version.
The "truth" of 9/11 is just Muslims being Muslims.
Mohammad Atta and the boys murdered Kafir for the glory of the sleazy pig djin, Allah.
Perhaps you can more eloquently point out exactly what it is about the laws of physics that were not suspended about the collapses of the buildings. We have only heard you say they weren't suspended or broken or ignored, but you never point out to anything, printed in papers, or otherwise to let us know why your opinion is different.still spewing that steaming pile about suspending, breaking,bending the laws of physics !Yeah those crafty Muslim Jihadists, knowing precisely when to attack during the terror drills, and suspending the laws of physics in Manhattan. Terror drills on 7-7 in the London tubes as well. Ever wonder how they knew all of this?? Probably not...The "truth" of 9/11 is just Muslims being Muslims.
Mohammad Atta and the boys murdered Kafir for the glory of the sleazy pig djin, Allah.
scientific write ups by who? to be valild they would have to be written by an objective source.Perhaps you can more eloquently point out exactly what it is about the laws of physics that were not suspended about the collapses of the buildings. We have only heard you say they weren't suspended or broken or ignored, but you never point out to anything, printed in papers, or otherwise to let us know why your opinion is different.still spewing that steaming pile about suspending, breaking,bending the laws of physics !Yeah those crafty Muslim Jihadists, knowing precisely when to attack during the terror drills, and suspending the laws of physics in Manhattan. Terror drills on 7-7 in the London tubes as well. Ever wonder how they knew all of this?? Probably not...
There are scientific write ups suggesting the laws of physics were violated concerning the WTC buildings demise, and they have been posted, complete with explanations.
You on the other hand only can say that these papers and the opinions within them are a "steaming pile" with absolutely nothing else from you that backs up this opinion of it all being just a "steaming pile" of shit..
You'll probably just run away from this challenge just like you do all the other times by saying stupid shit like "it's already been explained" or some other BS, again without posting anything to back up that statement as well. You are just a phoney, all talk and no back bone.
If the laws of physics were broken, why hasn't the entire scientific community come out and said so? If that happebed, the whole world would join the truther movement immediately. If what you're saying is true, then you should have no problem with getting the support of all scientists world wide.
Until then, expect nothing but laughter when you try floating this absurd conspiracy. Either put up or shut up.