Would you support anti abortion legislation as long as it included exceptions?

[koshergrl]

Sorry, but reporting a Rape is up to the victim or anyone who knows about it and has absolutely zero logic to do with whether or not to make a rape victim carry the baby to term.

Scratch a pro-abortionist, find a rapo.

 

[koshergrl]

yea, good response.

You're just doing what all pro-abortion freaks do...protect the rapists, justify killing babies. There's no point in discussing it if you can't be honest.

 

[Newby]

I agree. Its one of my pet peeves about the pro lifers.

I also feel that the pro life people should foot the entire financial bill for the care, feeding and housing of the "saved" child.

Really?? just why do you think a pro life person should have to foot the bill for a saved child? you did use the right adjective by the way. Because they care more about the childs life than the parents?? what kinda twisted logic is this?? If costs are a factor in if a child lives or dies we are the lowest of low.

Some people are peeved at others total disregard for human life,innocent human life.Projecting the financial burden onto others changes nothing.

Yes, i DO think that pro life folks should be adopting children. Adopting them... not fostering them.

Its called putting your money, time, home, love ect...where you mouth is. It sounds so good to say... have the baby, dont have an abortion and put it up for adoption. OK...so DO it!

You could say the same thing to those on the left who want to force everyone to pay for their 'charities'. Maybe they should adopt a homeless person and put their love, time, home, and money where their mouths are instead of forcing their morals on everyone else around them.

It's funny that when the right has 'morals' we should find some way to fix the issue without any government intervention, taxpayer money or laws to prevent the immorality. Yet when the left has morals, everyone should be forced to pay more via higher taxes to ensure that their values become the law of the land.

 

[koshergrl]

This is why there's no point in arguing with you. You're lying. Abortions do protect rapists, and I provided multiple examples.

 

[koshergrl]

"PP did not report in the case of Roe, who at the time of her abortion was 14 years old and the victim of sexual assault by her 22-year-old soccer coach, John Haller. Roe had the abortion in March 2004, and the abuse continued for some time after the abortion. Haller, who began having sex with the girl when she was 13, was ultimately convicted of sexual battery and served three years in prison. "

JUDGE RULES PLANNED PARENTHOOD BREACHED OHIO

 

[kaz]

Government has no business forcing a woman to carry a baby. Social conservatives should offer options and incentives to women rather then running to government to "solve" the problem for them. Then of course they decry government interfering in people's lives.

 

[koshergrl]

Yes, you apparently have them.

More prevarication by the abortionists. No big surprise. Continue to protect those rapists and kill those babies!

 

[koshergrl]

Sure I have.

 

[koshergrl]

I've shown that abortionists don't report rapes, and abort girls (often after consulting with the rapists), thereby hiding the evidence that a crime has taken place.

Thank you.

 

[koshergrl]

No, the answer to that is to eliminate abortion. The primary objective of abortion is to eliminate a despised population, and hide the crime of rape.

 

[koshergrl]

Nice opinion.

Has nothing to do with the fact that the abortionists make a nice little profit off rape and incest, which of course explains why they want to promote and hide those crimes when they happen.

They are the bread and butter of the baby killing industry. Death, rape, incest. The tri-fecta of the left.