Would You Prefer that Fanni Willis Simply Resign from the Trump Case?

[BULLDOG]

That's fine for me, I want her to lose, and she surely will if she stays on the case.

There's no way the jury isn't hearing about her thinking with her crotch instead of her brain. All it takes is one Trumper on the jury to mock her and convince the others to acquit.

Typical cult member. You expect jurors to decide based on political beliefs instead of facts.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You think the things presented to the Grand Jury weren't crimes, because you didn't like the way they were worded? Do you think the Grand Jury indicted him for things that weren't against the law? You're pretty goofy, aren't you?

I think that when someone violates a criminal statute, the prosecutor puts the statute and the evidence in the indictment.

You think the Grand Jury are these non-partisan folk who only care about the law?

Even if they were, all they hear from is the prosecution, so of course they will indict. Unless some of them have the balls and brains to see though "Hot Pants Willis'" nonsense and call her on it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Typical cult member. You expect jurors to decide based on political beliefs instead of facts.

Why not? The case was brought based on political beliefs instead of facts. "Doorknob Fanni" has had her fifteen minutes. If you really want a conviction, you should catch up with your liberal media and call for her to resign.

 

[White 6]

I would hope that the jurors would only consider the evidence, or more to the point, the lack of evidence of any criminality on Trump's part. If they did, acquital would be assured.

But if jurors only went by evidence, the grand jury would not have indicted in the first place. Read the indictment. Instead of saying "Defendant violated section blah-blah of criminal code whatsis, based on x and y evidence," Willis just recited a list of things trump did and put "criminally" in front of them. Really childish, like middle schoolers putting on a pay about a trial.

The trial is motivated, not by evidence, but by a mix of politics, emotion, and mental instability known as Trump Derangement Syndrome. If the jurors are sufferers, they might want to convict Trump. But one reasonable jury could snap them out of it, by pointing out the flaws in the very people who are claiming the moral high ground on Trump.

They will consider the evidence brought to the trial by the prosecution and how it is refuted by the defense. It is what juries do.
Grand juries only list to evidence to determine if there is enough, to support charges, to need a trial. You need to go back and find out what grand juries do, for yourself, because it is different, than you think.

 

[Seymour Flops]

They will consider the evidence brought to the trial by the prosecution and how it is refuted by the defense. It is what juries do.
Grand juries only list to evidence to determine if there is enough, to support charges, to need a trial. You need to go back and find out what grand juries do, for yourself, because it is different, than you think.

You’re describing what grand juries are supposed to do, not what they do.

They are noted for prosecutors’ ability to get them to “indict a ham sandwich.” Even Bow Legged Fanni can do that with such a one-sided procedure.

 

[White 6]

You’re describing what grand juries are supposed to do, not what they do.

They are noted for prosecutors’ ability to get them to “indict a ham sandwich.” Even Bow Legged Fanni can do that with such a one-sided procedure.

Yes and then it is up to a 12-person jury of a dependent's peers to hear all the evidence from both sides and weigh the balance.

 

[jbrownson0831]

So, you don't think they will consider the evidence, but decide based on evidence or heresay not related to trump and the charges? You have no faith in jurors to carry out their duties, do you?

Heresay? Like the Biden Crime Family hearsay?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yes and then it is up to a 12-person jury of a dependent's peers to hear all the evidence from both sides and weigh the balance.

Yes, and they’ll be laughing at Funtimes Fanni.

 

[White 6]

Yes, and they’ll be laughing at Funtimes Fanni.

I doubt if the jury can be nullified with that, as that will not be allowed into the trial, only the court house steps. Republican lawyers are famous for influence on the courthouse steps and right wing TV, but shitty in front of an actual judge and jury, as they are just PR people, often not displaying even a rudimentary knowledge or experience in courtroom trial law. You are a good example. You would make an excellent Republican lawyer on the "good ol' boy" circuit.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I doubt if the jury can be nullified with that, as that will not be allowed into the trial, only the court house steps. Republican lawyers are famous for influence on the courthouse steps and right wing TV, but shitty in front of an actual judge and jury, as they are just PR people, often not displaying even a rudimentary knowledge or experience in courtroom trial law. You are a good example. You would make an excellent Republican lawyer on the "good ol' boy" circuit.

But, you take such a naïve and Pollyanna view of the justice system. Everything happens exactly the way it supposed to happen in every case.

Do you always think it’s like that, or just in this one instance when it is Trump being prosecuted? What makes you think that there are no Democrat good old boys and girls who are shifty and interested in the PR? One good sign that a Democrat might be that, would be oh, I don’t know, hiring your own boyfriend to be a special prosecutor?

 

[White 6]

But, you take such a naïve and Pollyanna view of the justice system. Everything happens exactly the way it supposed to happen in every case.

Do you always think it’s like that, or just in this one instance when it is Trump being prosecuted? What makes you think that there are no Democrat good old boys and girls who are shifty and interested in the PR? One good sign that a Democrat might be that, would be oh, I don’t know, hiring your own boyfriend to be a special prosecutor?

On average it works out the way it was designed by the founding fathers. It is one reason, we have kept this representative republic, as long as we have.

 

[Seymour Flops]

On average it works out the way it was designed by the founding fathers. It is one reason, we have kept this representative republic, as long as we have.

This is not an average case, clearly.

 

[White 6]

This is not an average case, clearly.

Neither were the 62 post election cases in trial court or the Texas AG case after the lost election, bound for the Supreme Court, the Supremes refused to even hear, as the AG did not even realize he didn't even have standing, under our constitution. They simply are not good lawyers on political cases, even in Trump friendly courts.

 

[marvin martian]

From The Hill:

How could the district attorney of Fulton County, Ga., hire a friend with no major prosecutorial experience to handle one of the strongest cases against Donald Trump — thus putting the entire case in jeopardy? That question surfaced last week when Mike Roman, one of those charged along with Trump for election fraud in Georgia, accused DA Fani Willis of improperly hiring a romantic partner, Nathan Wade, as special prosecutor for the Trump case and financially benefiting from his appointment through luxury vacations they’ve taken together on his dime. Roman has filed papers demanding that the entire prosecution team be disqualified and the case against him and Trump be dismissed.

. . .

But, but, but — you can’t deny that the whole deal looks bad and carries a strong odor of political and personal favoritism. Wade may be, as Willis calls him, a Georgia legal “superstar.” But if she went outside state government to hire her boyfriend as special prosecutor, it was a monumental case of bad judgment on her part.

Even though there doesn’t appear to be anything that links her misconduct to the case against Trump, it raises serious questions of conflict of interest. And, worse yet, it gives the Trump camp more ammunition to fuel their phony claim that criminal charges against him are nothing but a political witch hunt.

This is not some Trump-friendly news outlet. This is a publication that is willing to throw away journalistic ethics to state their opinion as fact.

Yet, even they can see that Fanni "me so horny" Willis has become a liability.

What say you, Democrats? I said about Santos, "the quicker he resigns the better." Can you say the same about Willis?

This is how confident leftists are that their supporters won't EVER question them. They know how dumb and incurious their fellow DemoKKKrats are.

 

[Rambunctious]

I want that little piglet in prison....

 

[surada]

Cases coming apart? You've ben listening to fox again, haven't you

Unsealed original divorce documents don't mention Fulton County DA Fani Willis

The recently unsealed records pertaining to the divorce of Fulton County Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade do not provide any new evidence of an "improper, clandestine" relationship with his superior, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

www.fox5atlanta.com

 

[surada]

I think that when someone violates a criminal statute, the prosecutor puts the statute and the evidence in the indictment.

You think the Grand Jury are these non-partisan folk who only care about the law?

Even if they were, all they hear from is the prosecution, so of course they will indict. Unless some of them have the balls and brains to see though "Hot Pants Willis'" nonsense and call her on it.

Do you think everyone is as unscrupulous and dishonest as Trump? Do you think a career prosecutor would risk everything for a political persecution?

There are still plenty of decent, honorable Americans.

 

[surada]

This is how confident leftists are that their supporters won't EVER question them. They know how dumb and incurious their fellow DemoKKKrats are.

Unsealed original divorce documents don't mention Fulton County DA Fani Willis

The recently unsealed records pertaining to the divorce of Fulton County Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade do not provide any new evidence of an "improper, clandestine" relationship with his superior, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

www.fox5atlanta.com

 

[Seymour Flops]

Do you think everyone is as unscrupulous and dishonest as Trump? Do you think a career prosecutor would risk everything for a political persecution?

There are still plenty of decent, honorable Americans.

Yes, and Hillary called them”deplorables.”

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, and Hillary called them”deplorables.”

Just the deplorable ones who choose to believe trump's lies.