Would You Be In Favor Of Another Civil War?

Would You Be In Favor Of Another Civil War?


  • Total voters
    22
Or just make sure that all of the democrats are voted out of office and end the democratic party that way? Originally I was in favor of having another Civil War because it's obvious to me that many people in the democratic party want us dead, but that was until I was talking to one of my neighbors that we could just restore peace by voting the democrats out of office and restoring peace that way by destroying their party. It's a very interesting thought, but would it work? I'm currently on the fence about this one. 🤔
There are no clear geographic divisions like there usually are in a civil war so it's unlikely to happen.

And you should be thanking the imaginary sky daddy of your choice for that, because you kids would lose just like you did last time.
 
I can trace my online activism all the way back to at least the early nineties. Many of my posts from back then are still searchable in the "wayback machine."

I wouldn't risk losing much money if I were to pay $100 per thread to anyone who can find examples of anyone "talking to each other" rather than talking AT each other.
Then you would know, in the 90s, the infancy of the innerwebs, Debate on sites back then were waaaaaaaaay more civil...In fact, there were far smarter people on them...Back then you'd better know your shit, (instead of talking it) or you'd be laughed off the board....
 
Then you would know, in the 90s, the infancy of the innerwebs, Debate on sites back then were waaaaaaaaay more civil...In fact, there were far smarter people on them...Back then you'd better know your shit, (instead of talking it) or you'd be laughed off the board....

I never knew the Internet to be any differently because I was a baby and little kid in the 90's.
 
There are no clear geographic divisions like there usually are in a civil war so it's unlikely to happen.

And you should be thanking the imaginary sky daddy of your choice for that, because you kids would lose just like you did last time.
NY, Oregon, LA are geographic divisions and all polluted by leftists who hate America.
 
Then you would know, in the 90s, the infancy of the innerwebs, Debate on sites back then were waaaaaaaaay more civil...In fact, there were far smarter people on them...Back then you'd better know your shit, (instead of talking it) or you'd be laughed off the board....
That's not been my experience on any online debates. Though I have to admit my threads have almost always been primarily on the abortion issue.

Perhaps other issues were more civil, I don't know. I'm skimming the archives of my ACLU threads now and other than a lot of newbie mistakes that I can see I was making, the temperature is about what I see today on USMB, X, BluesCry, etc.
 
Last edited:
Or just make sure that all of the democrats are voted out of office and end the democratic party that way? Originally I was in favor of having another Civil War because it's obvious to me that many people in the democratic party want us dead, but that was until I was talking to one of my neighbors that we could just restore peace by voting the democrats out of office and restoring peace that way by destroying their party. It's a very interesting thought, but would it work? I'm currently on the fence about this one. 🤔

Didn't vote. Whatever it takes to be free of the flighty commie dem pigs...even civil war.

What is the choice under a filthy commie dem administration?

atf director biden.webp


+

IM2 drone.webp
 
If war is a sin then why did God call for it in the Bible? When Christ returns there will be war.


God allows and sometimes commands war in the Bible as a response to human sin and wickedness, often for judgment or to fulfill His divine purposes. However, the ultimate goal is peace, and the return of Christ is expected to bring an end to all conflict, ushering in a new era of harmony.
Biblically, war is often viewed as a consequence of sin, particularly self-centeredness and human conflict. The Bible teaches that the root of many issues, including war, is sin. This perspective suggests that while war itself is not inherently desired by God, it can occur as a result of humanity's fallen nature.
So your premise is not only illogical but spurious at best.
 
God allows and sometimes commands war in the Bible as a response to human sin and wickedness, often for judgment or to fulfill His divine purposes. However, the ultimate goal is peace, and the return of Christ is expected to bring an end to all conflict, ushering in a new era of harmony.
Biblically, war is often viewed as a consequence of sin, particularly self-centeredness and human conflict. The Bible teaches that the root of many issues, including war, is sin. This perspective suggests that while war itself is not inherently desired by God, it can occur as a result of humanity's fallen nature.
So your premise is not only illogical but spurious at best.


How can it be sin if God was telling people to go to war in the Bible?
 
There are no clear geographic divisions like there usually are in a civil war so it's unlikely to happen.

And you should be thanking the imaginary sky daddy of your choice for that, because you kids would lose just like you did last time.
~~~~~~>
For the first time in reading your posts I must agree with you..
The Left would lose badly, but again it would be costly to America in the end.
Just as it was at the end of the Civil War of 1861 to1865.
 
Are you freaking nuts? I wouldn't be in favor of the first one but apparently Lincoln was duped into thinking that the war would barely last a summer and casualties would be light. Four years later anywhere from 750,000 to a million Americans were dead and they were only using black powder. I can't imagine what the casualties would be today with modern weapons. Only a freak raised by watching cartoons would even suggest such a thing.
 
~~~~~~>
For the first time in reading your posts I must agree with you..
The Left would lose badly, but again it would be costly to America in the end.
Just as it was at the end of the Civil War of 1861 to1865.
YOu are confused again. The abolitionists were liberals. The conservatives were confederates.

History, son. You should read up on it.
 
15th post
The the number of terrorist attacks beginning to escalate throughout America, it's my opinion that this is what Democrat Socialists of America (CPUSA) are heading for.
They are of the sole opinion that a Civil War is the only way fully gain their Marxist Socialist aims.
Remember what Nakita Khrushchev said:
Plutelicking Litany

Trying to promote Capitalist Totalitarianism by claiming that anything disgusting is "Marxist." Why would they want to take over a country they had destroyed? Race, gender, and sexual preference have nothing to do with Marxism, an economic theory.
 
Since you are so hot on civil war, let's cut to the chase:

Who do you want to eliminate first? Who's on your hit list?

Based on your posts you say you are disabled and probably living off the government, how do you expect to survive a civil war when you can barely survive now.
Death Before Dishonor
Live Free or Die!
Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death
 
Back
Top Bottom