Would Democrats allow a GOP Candidate under multiple FBI investigations to stay in the race?

[easyt65]

Would Democrats, with weeks / days left in the election, allow a GOP Candidate under multiple FBI investigations, investigating crimes to include Influence Peddling, mishandling classified, and espionage, to stay iin the race?

Of course the answer is, "Hell No!"

Democrats, the fake news media, and radicalized snowflakes would have forced the GOP candidate out of the race.

But that is exactly did with / for Hillary.

How many delusional, hard-core snowfllakes are willing to admit it, admit reality?

Hollary shouldn't have been on the ballot on election day. She should have been perp-walked in handcuffs!

 

[konradv]

What would Democrats be able to do about who the Republican candidate is? Your thesis is beyond ridiculous.

 

[william the wie]

I must disagree. With a competent D politician at the top of the ticket the country would be in big trouble.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

 

[easyt65]

I am still waiting for a real answer. Konrad, for example, dodged it completely.

Perhaps the more straight-forward question is why did snowflakes and the Democratic party turn a blind eye to what they would not have tolerated from any GOPcandidate.

Conrad asked what they cpuld do in such a situation. Just look what the Democrats have done so far against Trump with no crime, no criminal activity, no collusion, no obstruction, and no evidence.

Just imagine what they could do to a GOP candidate who had done something illegal like Hillary, armed with the same evidence.

But seriously, why have Democrats lowered their standatds and ethics so low as to accept such a criminal piss-poor candidate rather than demand the Democratic Party raise its own?

 

[easyt65]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

Are you in the midst of a stroke?

Herman Cain remained on every ballot that he had qualified for.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anything that any conservative has ever done or will ever do is 100% bad and anything that any liberal has ever done or will ever do is 100% bad.

Snowflake logic.

 

[easyt65]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

Are you in the midst of a stroke?

Herman Cain remained on every ballot that he had qualified for.

Herman Cain's name remained in ballots, but he publicly pulled out of the race...and ypu know it. There is a big difference between the two. You should know that....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

Are you in the midst of a stroke?

Herman Cain remained on every ballot that he had qualified for.

Herman Cain's name remained in ballots, but he publicly pulled out of the race...and ypu know it. There is a big difference between the two. You should know that....

Yes, there is a big difference. One that according to your OP, you don't understand.

I accept your concession.

 

[easyt65]

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

Are you in the midst of a stroke?

Herman Cain remained on every ballot that he had qualified for.

Herman Cain's name remained in ballots, but he publicly pulled out of the race...and ypu know it. There is a big difference between the two. You should know that....

Yes, there is a big difference. One that according to your OP, you don't understand.

I accept your concession.

You can accept whatever lie you choose to tell yourself, snowflake....still doesn't make it true.

Democrats own the tactic of waging wars of personal destruction while protecting their own from crimes.

US AG Holder was protected from Felony Perjury

Hillary was protected from mumerous Felonies telating to criminal mis-hsndling of classified

Lynch was protected from Obstruction

Obama publicly declared he would not allow Harry Teid and Julian Castro to be charged with violating the Hatch Act because 'they are sorry for what they did.

W T F?!

No one can HONESTLY deny it....but some do partisanly.

Ay least be man enough to admit it.

 

[konradv]

I am still waiting for a real answer. Konrad, for example, dodged it completely.

Perhaps the more straight-forward question is why did snowflakes and the Democratic party turn a blind eye to what they would not have tolerated from any GOPcandidate.

Conrad asked what they cpuld do in such a situation. Just look what the Democrats have done so far against Trump with no crime, no criminal activity, no collusion, no obstruction, and no evidence.

Just imagine what they could do to a GOP candidate who had done something illegal like Hillary, armed with the same evidence.

But seriously, why have Democrats lowered their standatds and ethics so low as to accept such a criminal piss-poor candidate rather than demand the Democratic Party raise its own?

Well, Trump was never forced out. So, that proves your premise is bullshit. If there was ever a candidate who cheated more in his business dealings than Trump, please enlighten us.

 

[Seawytch]

On election day only one candidate was being investigated by the FBI...and it was not Hillary Clinton.

 

[imawhosure]

Would Democrats, with weeks / days left in the election, allow a GOP Candidate under multiple FBI investigations, investigating crimes to include Influence Peddling, mishandling classified, and espionage, to stay iin the race?

Of course the answer is, "Hell No!"

Democrats, the fake news media, and radicalized snowflakes would have forced the GOP candidate out of the race.

But that is exactly did with / for Hillary.

How many delusional, hard-core snowfllakes are willing to admit it, admit reality?

Hollary shouldn't have been on the ballot on election day. She should have been perp-walked in handcuffs!

Are you going to keep starting this thread every couple of months, even though your question has been answered, over and over?

Election law is quite clear about this - if a candidate files with the requisite number of petitions, etc, they can not be removed from the ballot by any means.

Even if they die before the election, their name will stay on the ballot.

You, as a mod, should be smart enough to know that political parties and their surrogates in the past have used lies, presdure, fake news, and emotional outcries to drive candidates out of the race.

Democrats have done so before. Take Herman Cain. The DNC dragged every bimbo out of the woodwork to accuse Vain of improper behavior. The Vaons decided tinning for office was not worth the sleaze Democrstes were engaging in. The liberal media crucified Cain, truth be damned.

Funny how after Cain dropped out every DNC bimbo crawled back in their hole to disappear, every law suit was dropped, and the major media suddenly stopped mentioning his name.

They drove him out of the race with lies, smears, false accusations, fake news, and lies.

Hillary should have been dragged from the race in hand cuffs.

Are you in the midst of a stroke?

Herman Cain remained on every ballot that he had qualified for.

Herman Cain's name remained in ballots, but he publicly pulled out of the race...and ypu know it. There is a big difference between the two. You should know that....

Yes, there is a big difference. One that according to your OP, you don't understand.

I accept your concession.

I think the Doctors legal facts are correct, but easy's premise is spot on without the legaleeze.

CONSIDER--------->Is that NOT what the left did to Rick Perry? And after it was all said and done, was he not totally exonerated?

And didn't they do that with a former Republican speaker of the house, that cost him MILLIONS! (from Texas I believe, or at least he resides there now) And after it was all said and done, the JUDGE ORDERED an apology from the prosecution, although the poor bast*** was broke after they were done with him.

And what may be worse---------> Are they not trying every trick in the book to remove Trump from office; a duly elected President? I mean, lets be real here.......Russia, crazy, emoluments clause, collusion, etc. It is almost a farce with the left. Let me rephrase that, it IS a farce! They go from one rule to another, day after day, and none of them stick. It is an obvious attempt to over turn the election, and the left thinks this is ok? No respect for the voters of this country at all, or the election process.

I ask--------> Name me one thing the Republican congress brought charges against Obama for to have him removed from office!

In closing, let me say that----->this is why the far left is in panic mode. When they win election, they claim that the people have spoken, and rightfully so. When they lose elections, they run to the courts and try everything in their power to STOP what Americans DID vote for. With Trump and the Repubs in charge, they are afraid the courts will change; meaning their 2nd avenue of governing without being elected will be removed. And what has Trump really done to screw them besides being elected, and removing some of Obama's EOs? NOTHING! They won't let him, lol.

Forget healthcare, Trump wants to give everyone a tax cut. Can the left argue on that? No! Why? Because let them tell people it is BAD that they keep more of their money, and watch how fast they lose another 1000 government positions. So instead they do this crap! In essence, they are PHONY BALONEY's, but everyone that can think logically, already knew that-)

 

[peach174]

On election day only one candidate was being investigated by the FBI...and it was not Hillary Clinton.

The Clinton foundation is still under investigation at this point in time as well as on election day.