insein
Senior Member
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040425/D82633UO0.html
Yep its all Bush. The congress has to pass it. Plus its not a BAN on abortions. ITs merely a ban on abortions in the 3rd trimester. Basically a ban on killing a 6 month old fetus.
Ive been on both sides of this issue. I dont feel that killing unborn children is productive for society. However, me and my ex-girlfriend had a scare when she was "late". We were young and we had no way to support a child. I however knew that my parents had me when i was young and they surely had no money to do it, but they did it. My dad basically gave his life away to work multiple jobs to support my mom and me. A rarity nowadays. I however would have done the same just so that we could have that kid. Needless to say we didnt. My sister is pregnant with no father in sight. She is working 2 jobs in order to make sure her child has a good start to life.
So i think these women have their priorities all fucked up. They still have their abortion rights, they just cant kill their unborn kids after 6 months. They should be thinking about taking the neccessary precautions to not be in that situation. Not relying on it as their failsafe. Then take personal responsibilty if they do become pregnant.
Apr 25, 5:47 PM (ET)
By ELIZABETH WOLFE
WASHINGTON (AP) - Abortion-rights supporters marched in the hundreds of thousands Sunday, galvanized by what they see as an erosion of reproductive freedoms under President Bush and foreign policies that hurt women worldwide.
Amid the clamor of an election year, the throng of demonstrators flooded the National Mall. Their target: Bush, like-minded officials in federal and state government and religious conservatives.
Speaking beyond the masses to policy-makers, Francis Kissling of Catholics for a Free Choice declared, "You will hear our pro-choice voices ringing in your ears until such time that you permit all women to make our own reproductive choices."
Women joined the protest from across the nation and from nearly 60 countries, asserting that damage from Bush's policies is spreading far beyond U.S. shores through measures such as the ban on federal money for family-planning groups that promote or perform abortions abroad.
The rally on the National Mall stretched from the base of the U.S. Capitol about a mile back to the Washington Monument. Authorities no longer give formal crowd estimates, but various police sources informally estimated the throng at between 500,000 and 800,000 strong.
That would exceed the estimated 500,000 who protested for abortion rights in 1992.
Carole Mehlman, 68, came from Tampa, Fla., to support a cause that has motivated her to march for 30 years, as long as abortion has been legal.
"I just had to be here to fight for the next generation and the generation after that," she said. "We cannot let them take over our bodies, our health care, our lives."
Yep its all Bush. The congress has to pass it. Plus its not a BAN on abortions. ITs merely a ban on abortions in the 3rd trimester. Basically a ban on killing a 6 month old fetus.
Ive been on both sides of this issue. I dont feel that killing unborn children is productive for society. However, me and my ex-girlfriend had a scare when she was "late". We were young and we had no way to support a child. I however knew that my parents had me when i was young and they surely had no money to do it, but they did it. My dad basically gave his life away to work multiple jobs to support my mom and me. A rarity nowadays. I however would have done the same just so that we could have that kid. Needless to say we didnt. My sister is pregnant with no father in sight. She is working 2 jobs in order to make sure her child has a good start to life.
So i think these women have their priorities all fucked up. They still have their abortion rights, they just cant kill their unborn kids after 6 months. They should be thinking about taking the neccessary precautions to not be in that situation. Not relying on it as their failsafe. Then take personal responsibilty if they do become pregnant.