Indeed, one shoots at fish in a barrel from the safety of an aircraft after the grunts risk their lives to acquire their targets for them and the other is stuck in the streets fighting it out with the enemy. Same result, different effort, different risk, different difficulty. In short, not every kill is the same. To make an extreme point, because this obviously isn't clear to you, a UAV pilot who scores a kill from the comfort of his desk didn't do a fraction of what a grunt did to achieve it. The same goes for the Wing. Now I'm not going to complain about the support I got while in Iraq but just remember, we were the main effort and everyone else was support.
The female infantry experiment was a wash and should not be supported by taxpayer dollars. A Victor Unit in the FMF (Which I KNOW you have never served in) is way more difficult than SOI. 12 mile ruck runs, 20 mile hikes in full battle gear, a full month in the Mojave Desert doing maneuvers at CAX, and days on end without sleep in Afghanistan and Iraq isn't exactly SOI. If SOI has a 65% drop out rate for women and OIC had a 100% drop out rate for women, if allowed to serve in infantry units, the FMF will eat them alive!
I don't care what program you were in and I volunteered for the infantry thank you very much. But I doubt you were ever in the Marines. Marines call a "fox hole" a "fighting hole." Which one did you call it? Marines know that no one gets slotted for the infantry; they must volunteer for it. (See your statement above)