lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 28,054
- 21,638
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #321
Republicans in action
What a surprise, the heathen liberals are upset because Clarence Thomas is going to overturn Griswold.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans in action
Next he'll take a stab at Loving v. Virginia.What a surprise, the heathen liberals are upset because Clarence Thomas is going to overturn Griswold.
Yes. This isn't Afghanistan.What a surprise, the heathen liberals are upset because Clarence Thomas is going to overturn Griswold.
If he's a strict Constitutionalist he will.Next he'll take a stab at Loving v. Virginia.
In this discussion, the only person forced into a duty is men. It’s kind of a shotgun marriage. Only one party has say in the matter after intercourseIsn't it interesting how that poster encourages FORCING women to get married?
Lenny,If he's a strict Constitutionalist he will.
More laws aren't needed.
What's needed is a America with morals, standards and standards. We could get rid of a lot of laws if our country had that. Not saying it was perfect but in the 50s we didn't have issues we do now or so many laws because we had a general sense of morals, values and standards in our society.
Abortion wasn't such an issue either because of that because women were raised to be responsible in what they did and weren't all hedonistic rutting pigs jumping on every dick they can and shaking their ass in tv commercials. And that was partly due to having a father figure and a mother.
No.If he's a strict Constitutionalist he will.
This is all about someone gettin' what they ain'tI love people who don’t know History.
Lessons from Before Roe: Will Past be Prologue?
With an administration deeply opposed to abortion, a Congress poised to pass legislation aimed at weakening the principles underlying Roe v. Wade and a Supreme Court whose composition is considered likely to change in the near future, it is instructive to look back at the choices available—and...www.guttmacher.org
Between 200,000 and 1.2 million abortions a year during the ‘50’s and ‘60’s.
Yes they were illegal. And yes they were performed regularly. Only they were far more dangerous and performed by anyone who said they could do it.
I love people who don’t know History.
Lessons from Before Roe: Will Past be Prologue?
With an administration deeply opposed to abortion, a Congress poised to pass legislation aimed at weakening the principles underlying Roe v. Wade and a Supreme Court whose composition is considered likely to change in the near future, it is instructive to look back at the choices available—and...www.guttmacher.org
Between 200,000 and 1.2 million abortions a year during the ‘50’s and ‘60’s.
Yes they were illegal. And yes they were performed regularly. Only they were far more dangerous and performed by anyone who said they could do it.