Which debater is more accurately describing Asylum Laws in place? Debater A: Exception basically only applies to Canada. No one else has an agreement. So Trump can deport Canadians without offering asylum. that's about it. Debater B: No, it applies to many countries, we have third party agreements Panama, Costa Rica. El Salvador, and many African countries have all agreed to accept third party deportees from the United States Debater A: Come on man. That’s not how the law works. ‘They’ll take deportees’ isn’t a safe-third-country agreement, and without one, you can’t bypass asylum rights just by dumping people somewhere else. Again. Only Canada has the agreement in place. No one else. Debater B: Wrong we routinely send people to other countries that will take them And have for years You have no clue what you are talking about Debater A: You're confused. I'm telling you the law not asking for your opinion. You’re describing deportation, not asylum law. The issue is whether people get to apply, not where they’re sent after they lose. They get to apply and be heard. You are right about what happens after a fair hearing. Trump and the GOP are trying to violate applicants' right to apply. Debater B: You are telling me your bastardized view of the law that doesn’t match reality Sure under certain circumstances they get to apply
