No, it's fine for anyone in a free-for-all to attempt to win wars and take land, we just won. We were "special" not because of our race, but because of our advanced culture. But you only view it through race, like a KKK member.
I agree, advanced TECHNOLOGY allowed white people do some shitty things around the world.
I know that back when your grandpa was around you Democrats were making sure black people were beneath you.. and I've never heard anyone not acknowledge this history on either side, no matter what woke, CRT, BLM leftists claim. We're talking about what happens today.
Because it's not an accurate rendering of history, really. Republicans gave up on racial equality in 1876, when getting the all important RutherFraud B. Hayes in office after the people rejected him became more important than protecting the rights of black people.
Prove it. I mean, I can name:
- Mao Zedong and The Chinese Great Leap Forward (45-80 million dead)
Yeeah, when you lead with Bircher Propaganda like that, um, no one can take you seriously.
Now, my wife lived through the Great Famine (which killed 15 million people, not 80 million), but that wasn't an intentionally extermination, like Hitler's Germany.
It was a combination of natural disasters along with some bad policy choices.
Rwandan Genocide in Africa
Only about 500K people, nothing compared to Hitler or Stalin who killed millions, not to mention the near extermination of native Americans in the New World.
Pol Pot's Cambodian Genocide
About 1 million. Not even close to HItler and Stalin.
Committed by the imperial Turks, who were.. mostly white. Definitely Caucasian.
The Muslim expansion and conquering of Asia, Turkey, Northern africa, Spain, France.
No real death toll on that one. Thing about medieval warfare was that it wasn't that terribly bloody.
The Japanese Nanjing Massacre, and Japan's Unit 731
Japan were a bunch of bastards, but the thing about Japan was that it was emulating European imperialism.
Aztecs murdering children in ritual sacrifices.
Two points here. First, most of the people sacrificed in Aztec religious sacrifices were adult males, usually from enemy tribes. Secondly, these stories were VASTLY exagerated by the Spanish to justify their own abuses, which again, lead to a 75% drop in the Native population within 100 years of Columbus.
The Atlantic Slave trade (blacks capturing other blacks), along with the Trans Saharan and Indian Ocean slave trades.
You mean the slave trade that only existed because white people were buying?