Witness who saw the towers collapse on 9/11.

And Moses used his staff to phaser down the Amalekites...

Well, no, Moses the coward ran up the hill and hid while the Levites did all the fighting....
I believe you're right about them being cargo planes, and I believe they were each loaded with fusion devices or whatever it was that was used to melt the steel.

It implies a lot and raises more questions like . .. not the least of which -- what happened to the "hijacked airliners"and the crew and passengers on them . ?

Parked in a hangar and gassed ? We'll never know.
 
Then explain the river of molten steel 2200F pouring out of the South Tower.

You can't without THERMITE....




R.7d5a3bd72f856c7ce16a1421001b0818

See the source image

See the source image



There is no evidence it was molten steel.

There is no evidence of thermite.
 
The molten steel is a smoking gun.

Both towers were rigged by Israeli firms for controlled demolition. The CIA was also involved, because the CIA under Zionist Traitor George Tenet was essentially an appendage of the Mossad, and still is.
There was no moolten steel you treasonous queer.

There were no demolitions and no eviddence supports your idiotic claim.
 
Wow!

So now we have a glimpse into how truthers think the towers were supposedly brought down.

1. Cargo planes, loaded with "fusion devices (or something)", where flown into the towers to melt the steel columns
2. There was also thermite painted onto to the steel beams and surrounding carpeting to melt the steel columns
3. There were explosives planted at the BOTTOM of the towers to cut the steel columns even though the collapses initiated in the upper third

FUSION DEVICES on CARGO PLANES!!!!

:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
There is no evidence it was molten steel.

There is no evidence of thermite.
What's even funnier is that they think a "thin layer of thermite painted on the core columns) created enough molten steel to create a "river " that flowed from the core columns in the middle of the building, across the concrete floor, and poured out of the corner.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
What's even funnier is that they think a "thin layer of thermite painted on the core columns) created enough molten steel to create a "river " that flowed from the core columns in the middle of the building, across the concrete floor, and poured out of the corner.

:auiqs.jpg:

Enough thermite to continue burning for weeks (months?).
 
Enough thermite to continue burning for weeks (months?).
Then you have Steven Jones, who was part of the Niels Harrit thermite paper, give a presentation where he showed slides comparing the XEDS spectra of thermite chips they examined and paint chips only to find the spectra matched between the two!

Truther idiocy at it's best!
 
Saving you people the trouble and posting this here
in the conspiracy theory forum because Paul Lemos is an eyewitness
who heard and saw explosions before the second (South) tower collapsed.

You're welcome.

1635254210922.png
 
Conclusion drawn from a German nuclear physicist in regards to Hulsey's models used in his report.
In summary, whatever Hulsey's model actually does internally, it is obviously totally unsuitable to draw any conclusions about what happened on September11, 2001. It describes a fantasy world that contradicts the most fundamental laws of mechanics, in which complex buildings behave like massive blocks and steel girders falling through concrete slabs without even being distracted
 
What's even funnier is that they think a "thin layer of thermite painted on the core columns) created enough molten steel to create a "river " that flowed from the core columns in the middle of the building, across the concrete floor, and poured out of the corner.

:auiqs.jpg:



You cannot explain the river of molten steel. Your explanation is to lie and claim jet fuel burns hot enough to melt its engines. Laughable.

Thermite caused this....




R.7d5a3bd72f856c7ce16a1421001b0818


See the source image







 
You cannot explain the river of molten steel. Your explanation is to lie and claim jet fuel burns hot enough to melt its engines. Laughable.

Thermite caused this....




R.7d5a3bd72f856c7ce16a1421001b0818


See the source image







You have no proof of molten steel. Nobody can identify a molten substance by sight.

You're lying when you say I claimed the fires melted the planes engines. Please quote me saying this or shut the hell up.

Thin layers of "painted on" thermite would not be able to "burn for 2+ month like you claim. Is that why you can only post pictures to support your claims?

How did the thin layer of thermite on the columns create enough "molten steel" for it to travel from the core columns in the center, over the concrete floor, and then pour out the corner?!

Do you have any science to back your crap up? I didn't think so.

What an idiot!

:auiqs.jpg:
 
say I claimed the fires melted the planes engines.


The plane's engines operate up to 600F....

Duh...

Over 800F and the metal of the engine starts to lose "rigidity..."

Duh...


Try to pass third grade next time...
 
Why was Paul Bremer silent on 9/11 about the fact that the first airplane went right into his company's office in the North Tower?
"The nose of the first plane went into our offices. For us the World Trade Center and 9/11 was about as bad as it could get."
- Robert Wilkerson, senior vice president of Marsh Crisis Consulting, "9/11 shows need for crisis planning," Deseret News, March 15, 2002
Lewis Paul Bremer was chairman and CEO of Marsh Crisis Consulting, a risk and insurance services firm which is a subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC). Bremer and 1,700 of the employees of Marsh & McLennan had offices in the World Trade Center. Bremer's office was in the North Tower.
The plane that hit the North Tower went right into the computer center and offices of Bremer's company. As Robert Wilkerson, senior vice president of Marsh Crisis Consulting, told the press: "The nose of the first plane went into our offices. For us the World Trade Center and 9/11 was about as bad as it could get."
When the first plane hit the North Tower, 294 employees of Marsh & McLennan were working in offices on the upper floors. Not one of them survived.
So, doesn't it seem odd that on September 11, when Bremer was interviewed in Washington on WRC-TV (NBC) at 12:30 pm in the studio that he did not even mention the fact that the first plane had gone into his company's offices and killed hundreds of his employees?
Bremer is quite cool, maybe too cool, in the interview and shows no sign of emotion, which seems very odd for a person whose office was just hit by a plane. Why was he silent about this important fact? Bremer, who was the chairman of the National Committee on Terrorism, was instead rather keen on blaming Osama bin Laden, and perhaps Iran and Iraq for the terror attacks that had just wiped out his company's offices.
Three days later, in an interview on CNN, Bremer stated that their office was located "above where the second aircraft hit." This statement, however, is contradicted by Wikipedia (See: Paul Bremer) and the statement by the company's VP Wilkerson, although MMC reportedly did have offices in both towers.
Then, at 4 minutes and 45 seconds of the interview video, Bremer is answering a question about how the terror attacks will change our lives. Bremer says, "It is a day that will change our lives. It's a day when the war... (pause) ...the terrorists declared on the United States..."
What was Bremer going to say when he stopped himself? Was he going to say, "It's a day when the war on terrorism began? It seems like that was what he was going to say when he checked himself. He clearly had to re-think what he was planning to say.
See:
 

Forum List

Back
Top