Witness 41 a cerified liar.

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
59,576
Reaction score
21,771
Points
2,260
Location
North Carolina
So where are all those whining about witness 40 now? Gonna complain that this witness should not have been on the stand too? Or is this different?
Neither witness would have survived cross examination in a criminal courtroom, so why do you suppose the DA muddied the GJ's water with their "testimonies?"
 
Some are willing to rant and rave against Witness 40, yet ignore 41, Dorian Johnson, and others. No shame, really.
 
So where are all those whining about witness 40 now? Gonna complain that this witness should not have been on the stand too? Or is this different?
Neither witness would have survived cross examination in a criminal courtroom, so why do you suppose the DA muddied the GJ's water with their "testimonies?"
...because its a big conspiracy? Is that where you are going with this? Keep your moronic opinions to yourself.
 
So where are all those whining about witness 40 now? Gonna complain that this witness should not have been on the stand too? Or is this different?
Neither witness would have survived cross examination in a criminal courtroom, so why do you suppose the DA muddied the GJ's water with their "testimonies?"
Because he said he would present all witnesses. If he had failed to do so you would be claiming a cover up.
 
because its a big conspiracy? Is that where you are going with this? Keep your moronic opinions to yourself.
Why do you think the DA took testimony from witnesses 40 and 41 when neither story would have survived cross examination?
...because it was a BIG conspiracy. They didnt count on you though, did they. You are going to set everyone straight.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom