The Radical Left is obviously erring on the side of criminals, to the detriment of innocent people, but I take the opposite tact: under which circumstances should someone arrested be put in jail until his trial, NO bail option.
1) Anyone who is arrested for a violent crime who has already been convicted of a prior violent crime.
2) Anyone who is arrested for mass murder when it is obvious that there was no self-defense involved (such as the SUV driver).
3) Anyone who is arrested for a non-violent felony (such as theft) who has already been convicted of two previous non-violent felonies.
Anyone else?
1) Anyone who is arrested for a violent crime who has already been convicted of a prior violent crime.
2) Anyone who is arrested for mass murder when it is obvious that there was no self-defense involved (such as the SUV driver).
3) Anyone who is arrested for a non-violent felony (such as theft) who has already been convicted of two previous non-violent felonies.
Anyone else?