Wisconsin GOP: Forcing Women To Undergo Transvaginal Ultrasounds Is Our ‘Priority"

[daveman]

Yes, because we sure don't want women to be reminded that the inconvenient lump of tissue they're intending to kill is an actual human baby, do we?

They might change their minds. And we can't have that. We only support a woman's right to choose if she chooses to abort.

Right, USMB lefties?

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

If they could control their bodies, they wouldn't need to use abortion as birth control, would they?

 

[Noomi]

Right, because abortions are not invasive. I mean sticking a vaginal vacuum into a woman's cervix after going into her vagina to suck out her unborn baby is not invasive, but going only into her vagina is...

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

An abortion is elective and there is no need to have one.

The point is that abortions kill the unborn child inside the womb. To require a woman to fully know what she is doing by seeing the heartbeat, the growing baby, is a positive thing.

The fact that pro abortionists don't want women to see what it is that they are actually doing...not allowing a "picture" of a living unborn baby to be seen, is proof positive they know that they are killing a baby in abortions.

It has been shown that despite forcing women to see the fetus on screen, it doesn't change her mind regarding the abortion.

 

[Noomi]

Yes, because we sure don't want women to be reminded that the inconvenient lump of tissue they're intending to kill is an actual human baby, do we?

They might change their minds. And we can't have that. We only support a woman's right to choose if she chooses to abort.

Right, USMB lefties?

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

If they could control their bodies, they wouldn't need to use abortion as birth control, would they?

How many women do you know who have used abortion as their sole method of birth control?

 

[Avatar4321]

yes because educating women before determining to abort a pregnancy is so terrible. Liberals are all for limited government when it comes to the protection of the unborn, but limiting the size of soft drinks, Happy Meal Toys, smoking--they are all for government intrusion. Sickening hypocrites.

Women don't need lifers to educate them. They know what abortion is, they don't need to see the fetus before making a decision. They are not stupid.

Then why is it it the stats for abortion drop significantly when they see their child?

You know, if they already know everything.

Heck, if they already know everything, why does planned parenthood spend so much educting women on obtaining an abortion?

 

[Avatar4321]

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

Because pregnancy and an erection is the same in the perverse mind of a leftist.

FYI, erections are the first step in most pregnancies.

Wow that's a profound point...

 

[Avatar4321]

Yes, because we sure don't want women to be reminded that the inconvenient lump of tissue they're intending to kill is an actual human baby, do we?

They might change their minds. And we can't have that. We only support a woman's right to choose if she chooses to abort.

Right, USMB lefties?

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

Which is why women wrote the bill and are the ones pushing for it.

 

[Google]

Yes, because we sure don't want women to be reminded that the inconvenient lump of tissue they're intending to kill is an actual human baby, do we?

They might change their minds. And we can't have that. We only support a woman's right to choose if she chooses to abort.

Right, USMB lefties?

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

A woman's body does not have two heads, four hands, four legs, two beating hearts and two sets of DNA. Your hatred of the unborn and of personal responsiblity is disgusting. I've personally talked to many women who have had an abortion, and the psychological effects are devasting, and informing them of the consequences and of the medical situation before making the desicion is not pro life junk--it is embrassing the idea of pro choice.

You and your side want to silence those you disagree with.

 

[Avatar4321]

Because pregnancy and an erection is the same in the perverse mind of a leftist.

FYI, erections are the first step in most pregnancies.

Yep. In order to get pregnant, you need a vagina and an erect penis. Viagra can help an erection, therefore helping to create a child. Thus, a rectal exam must be performed before a prescription for Viagra is given.

If men wish to force women to undergo an invasive procedure, they should be willing to undergo one themselves. No surprise that they are too damned cowardly.

Im not sure what men you hang out with, but most dont need viagra.

 

[clevergirl]

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

An abortion is elective and there is no need to have one.

The point is that abortions kill the unborn child inside the womb. To require a woman to fully know what she is doing by seeing the heartbeat, the growing baby, is a positive thing.

The fact that pro abortionists don't want women to see what it is that they are actually doing...not allowing a "picture" of a living unborn baby to be seen, is proof positive they know that they are killing a baby in abortions.

It has been shown that despite forcing women to see the fetus on screen, it doesn't change her mind regarding the abortion.

Really, let me see that study.

 

[daveman]

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

If they could control their bodies, they wouldn't need to use abortion as birth control, would they?

How many women do you know who have used abortion as their sole method of birth control?

Personally, one for sure.

And stats show that about 98% of abortions are elective.

Reasons given for having abortions in the United States

REASONS FOR ABORTIONS: COMPILED ESTIMATES
rape 0.3 % (0.1-0.6 %)
incest 0.03 % (0.01-0.1 %)
physical life of mother 0.1 % (0.01-0.3 %)
physical health of mother 1.0 % (0.1-3 %)
fetal health 0.5 % (0.1-1.0 %)
mental health of mother ?? (0.1-8 %)
elective
--too young/immature/not ready for responsibility --? (32 %)
--economic --30% (20-40 %)
--to avoid adjusting life --? (16 %)
--mother single or in poor relationship --? (12-13 %)
--enough children already --? (4-8 %)
--sex selection 98% (87-99 %)​

So, "We want abortion to be safe, legal, and rare" is one-third flat-out lie.

 

[Avatar4321]

Women don't need pamphlets, either, they will be filled with pro life junk. Women can make their own decisions and they don't need men controlling their lives!

Yeah **** pamphlets, having ultrasounds, or being educated at all beyond what an abortion clinic tells a woman. We all know how truthful and ethical they are.

Yeah, and how truthful are lifers? Telling women that abortion causes cancer, that they will become suicidal, blah blah. Just **** off and let women make their own freaking decisions!

Why are you so eager to have them make uneducated decisions? Why do you want to keep women ignorant?

 

[Noomi]

yes because educating women before determining to abort a pregnancy is so terrible. Liberals are all for limited government when it comes to the protection of the unborn, but limiting the size of soft drinks, Happy Meal Toys, smoking--they are all for government intrusion. Sickening hypocrites.

Women don't need lifers to educate them. They know what abortion is, they don't need to see the fetus before making a decision. They are not stupid.

Then why is it it the stats for abortion drop significantly when they see their child?

You know, if they already know everything.

Heck, if they already know everything, why does planned parenthood spend so much educting women on obtaining an abortion?

They don't. Seeing the fetus on screen doesn't make a woman change her mind.

 

[Plasmaball]

Right, because abortions are not invasive. I mean sticking a vaginal vacuum into a woman's cervix after going into her vagina to suck out her unborn baby is not invasive, but going only into her vagina is...

one isnt forced retard

 

[Noomi]

Yeah **** pamphlets, having ultrasounds, or being educated at all beyond what an abortion clinic tells a woman. We all know how truthful and ethical they are.

Yeah, and how truthful are lifers? Telling women that abortion causes cancer, that they will become suicidal, blah blah. Just **** off and let women make their own freaking decisions!

Why are you so eager to have them make uneducated decisions? Why do you want to keep women ignorant?

Why do men think they know more about abortion than the people who have them?

 

[Plasmaball]

Yes, because this is IN NO WAY invasive:

abortion is a choice, this isnt moron

 

[Avatar4321]

At least lefties try and help those that are born, unlike the right, who doesn't want anybody aborted, but then doesn't give a damn about them once they are born, whether they are dying of hunger or don't have health care.

You do realize that simply because you repeat propaganda doesn't mean it becomes true, right?

Why is it you seem to think that controling our health care is no big deal, but its invasive to show women that their child has a heart beat?

 

[Avatar4321]

It has been shown that despite forcing women to see the fetus on screen, it doesn't change her mind regarding the abortion.

Then why are you so afraid of women seeing their child on screen?

 

[Plasmaball]

Right, because abortions are not invasive. I mean sticking a vaginal vacuum into a woman's cervix after going into her vagina to suck out her unborn baby is not invasive, but going only into her vagina is...

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

Because pregnancy and an erection is the same in the perverse mind of a leftist.

one is a choice and the other would not be. So you support authoritarian measures with your government yet want to rail on about liberals......Hypocrite.

 

[Plasmaball]

At least lefties try and help those that are born, unlike the right, who doesn't want anybody aborted, but then doesn't give a damn about them once they are born, whether they are dying of hunger or don't have health care.

You do realize that simply because you repeat propaganda doesn't mean it becomes true, right?

Why is it you seem to think that controling our health care is no big deal, but its invasive to show women that their child has a heart beat?

hasnt stopped you from posting

 

[Avatar4321]

Women don't care what you think. They care about controlling their bodies, and they won't let men stand in their way.

If they could control their bodies, they wouldn't need to use abortion as birth control, would they?

How many women do you know who have used abortion as their sole method of birth control?

Im pretty sure Dave doesnt hang out with those women.