jehanne1431
Diamond Member
- Nov 7, 2018
- 1,238
- 1,182
- 1,940
I am used to your kind. No one has the time to point out why your own credibility is really what's on trial here. Hope you are doing well.I stopped reading at the mention of "infowars".
Not really accurate because on party pushed their people to use the mail in ballots and the other side scared their folks away from using them. Thus no matter where they came from they were always going to favor the Dems as it was the Dems that were most apt to use the mail in ballot system.
Not that I expected anyone here to read it, but the scientist who did the study is not even arguing that mail-in ballots favored the democrat. It is the change in ratios of mail-in ballots that came in late night. Allegedly, all mail-in ballots have to be in at a certain time (that was violated) and all mail-in ballots are to be mixed together so no matter which precinct they may have come from, when mixed together the ratio between Dem and Repub in the count should never deviate much from beginning to end. Well, they do deviate greatly later in the night in the swing states. He calls this statistically fraudulent. So do I. In Wisconsin's case, it was simply illegal what they did with late mail-ins after the deadline.
Infowars ? Please get help.
I suppose that this is the level that the steal nutters have sunk to now.
I hardly know ye, Tommy. But I think I know enough. You have no interest in listening to reason. You can do that as long as one isolates themselves in a bubble.