Windmills create warming

[Old Rocks]

'Stealing the wind': Nations actually fighting over using too much AIR! * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

'They also are being shown to affect meteorological and atmospheric conditions'

www.wnd.com

Why didn't they follow the science...my god they've killed us all by making it worse

LOL Well, I would not trust what a rightwingnut journalist says concerning renewables. After all, his child raping President does not like them, so he must also dislike them. LOL Yes, windmills can increase night time temperatures by as much as 0.24 degrees C. However, that is localized and does not change to total heat content of the atmosphere. Because while the surface temperature is increased, the layer that the warmer air is drawn from experiences a decrease in temperature. Zero net increase in atmospheric temperatures. Whereas adding GHG's to the atmosphere increases the temperature of the whole atmosphere.

"Research indicates that wind farms can cause localized warming, potentially raising surface temperatures by up to 0.24 degrees Celsius due to their interaction with atmospheric conditions.

Localized​

1. Impact on Surface Temperatures: Studies have shown that wind turbines can raise local surface temperatures. For instance, research from Harvard University found that if the U.S. transitioned to large-scale wind energy, it could warm average surface temperatures by approximately 0.24 degrees Celsius. This warming is attributed to the turbines mixing warmer air from higher altitudes down to the surface, particularly affecting nighttime temperatures.
   
   2
2. Mechanism of Warming: The warming effect occurs because wind turbines disturb air currents, leading to increased atmospheric mixing. This process can result in warmer air being pulled down to the surface, which raises local temperatures, especially at night.
   
   1
3. Cumulative Impacts: As wind farms proliferate, concerns have been raised about their cumulative effects on local climates. Some studies suggest that the rapid expansion of wind energy could significantly alter local meteorological conditions, potentially impacting agriculture and natural ecosystems.
   
   2
4. 
   
   
   
   
   
   4 Sources

Broader​

• Comparison with Greenhouse Gas Emissions: While wind energy has a smaller overall environmental impact compared to fossil fuels, the immediate warming effects of wind turbines can be significant in the short term. In some analyses, the localized warming from wind energy could be comparable to the warming effects of traditional fossil fuels when viewed over a short time frame.
  
  2
• Long-Term Benefits vs. Short-Term Impacts: Over longer periods, the benefits of reduced greenhouse gas emissions from wind energy are expected to outweigh the localized warming effects. However, the immediate impacts of wind farms must be considered in the context of energy policy and climate strategy.
  
  2
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Conclusion​

While wind energy is a crucial component of the transition to renewable energy sources, it is essential to recognize that wind farms can contribute to localized warming. Understanding these impacts is vital for making informed decisions about energy production and its environmental consequences.

Harvard University
The Down Side to Wind Power | Harvard University Center for the Environment


Science News
How wind power could contribute to a warming

 

[Old Rocks]

Come on man follow the science......

I did. And what it said was that it mixed heat from a higher level to a lower level at the surface. No net increase in atmospheric temperature at all. Just a redistribution of existing temperature.

 

[Old Rocks]

Wind turbines put carbon fibers in the air that end up in your lungs. They cost too much and fall apart after 10 years. Solar just also increases energy costs and neither can meet demand. Hundreds of solar farms have gone broke and wind turbines have been canceled all over the country and banned offshore. Green energy is dead issue. Nuclear and fossil fuels are the future

What a liar you continue to be.

"Modern wind turbines typically have a lifespan of 20 to 25 years, with some capable of lasting up to 30 years or more under optimal conditions.

Lifespan​

• Design and Expectations: Most modern wind turbines are designed to operate efficiently for 20 to 25 years. With proper maintenance and favorable environmental conditions, some turbines can extend their operational life to 30 years or even longer, particularly in offshore settings where they may face harsher conditions.
  
  2
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Factors​

1. Maintenance Practices: Regular maintenance is crucial for extending the lifespan of wind turbines. Routine checks, typically conducted once or twice a year, help identify and address potential issues before they lead to significant failures.
   
   1
2. Environmental Conditions: The location of the turbine plays a significant role in its longevity. Onshore turbines generally last longer than offshore ones due to less exposure to corrosive saltwater and extreme weather conditions.
   
   1
3. Design and Material Quality: Advances in engineering and materials have improved the durability of modern turbines. Better aerodynamic designs and high-quality materials reduce structural stress and wear on critical components.
   
   1
4. Operational Management: Effective operational strategies can also enhance the lifespan of wind turbines. Smart management practices help optimize performance and reduce wear and tear.
   
   1
5. 
   
   
   1 Source

Conclusion​

In summary, while the typical lifespan of modern wind turbines is around 20 to 25 years, various factors such as maintenance, environmental conditions, and design quality can influence their longevity. With advancements in technology and proper care, many turbines can continue to operate effectively beyond their expected lifespan.

Energy Follower
How Long Do Wind Turbines Last? Average Lifespan Explained


greenbusinessbarbados.com
What Is The Average Life Of A Wind Turbine

 

[Old Rocks]

There have been a long list of Bankrupt solar companies in part because the tax breaks dried up...., and the wind power towers are not getting repaired when they stop working as that would create a negative cash flow.

The Complete List of Solar Bankruptcies and Business Closures

LINK

Solyndra failed despite a $500 million infusion from the ever generous Federal government.

A fellow near where I used to live had an old Whippet in his backyard. Have you any idea of how many small auto manufacturers went broke in the US when that form of transportation became popular? That is part and parcel of capitalism. Companies that innovate and are efficient survive, those that don't, do not.

As for your silly lie about not repairing wind turbines, that is nonsense. If there is a problem there it is from lack of technicians.




Like
Dislike

Opportunities in Wind Turbine Maintenance​

The wind turbine maintenance sector is experiencing strong growth and expanding career opportunities due to the rapid expansion of wind energy capacity and the need for skilled technicians.

Market Growth and Demand​

• The global wind turbine operations and maintenance (O&M) market is projected to reach USD 59.67 billion by 2030, growing at 8.5% CAGR from 2025 MarketsandMarkets.
• The maintenance, repair & overhaul (MRO) market is expected to grow at 13.3% CAGR from 2026 to 2033, driven by aging turbine fleets and increased adoption of predictive maintenance LinkedIn.
• In the U.S., wind turbine service technicians are ranked as the #1 fastest-growing occupation, with a projected 49.9% employment increase by 2034 tradecolleges.org.

Why Demand Is Rising​

• Expanding installed base: Over 161 GW of wind capacity in the U.S., with 6,474 MW added in 2023 alone tradecolleges.org.
• Policy and investment: The Inflation Reduction Act and DOE forecasts show a 60% increase in new wind capacity by 2026, with over $352 billion in cumulative investment tradecolleges.org.
• Workforce gap: A projected 124,000 worker shortfall by 2030, with 68% of employers reporting difficulty finding qualified applicants tradecolleges.org.

Career Paths and Roles​

• Field Service Technicians: Perform preventive, corrective, and unscheduled maintenance on turbines Indeed.
• Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Technicians: Oversee daily operations, maintenance schedules, and repairs Indeed.
• Specialized Roles: Motor rewinding, generator repair, component shop work, and offshore maintenance using drones/ROVs Indeed+1.
• Advanced Skills: Predictive maintenance, IoT/SCADA monitoring, and AI-driven diagnostics are becoming key competencies MarketsandMarkets+1.

Training and Entry​

• Many employers offer paid training programs and 401(k) matching Indeed.
• Trade schools and vocational programs provide pathways to technician certification.
• OEMs like Vestas, Siemens Gamesa, Nordex, and Enercon are expanding service networks, creating opportunities for both onshore and offshore roles LinkedIn.

Emerging Trends​

• Predictive maintenance: Using IoT sensors, AI, and real-time monitoring to reduce downtime and costs MarketsandMarkets+1.
• Offshore focus: Growth in offshore wind is driving demand for specialized offshore maintenance crews MarketsandMarkets.
• Digitalization: Integration of autonomous inspection systems and remote diagnostics MarketsandMarkets.

Bottom line: The wind turbine maintenance sector offers high-growth, well-paying careers with strong demand, especially in the U.S. and globally. Entry can be through vocational training, and advanced skills in predictive maintenance and offshore operations are increasingly valuable.

 

[Old Rocks]

They get built because of the overly generaous tax breaks as Warren BUffet pointed out as he got $6 BILLION out of it in 3 years time.

===

Wind Power Doesn’t Make Sense: Berkshire Hathaway​

Wind Power Doesn’t Make Sense Without the Tax Credits (full series)

LINK

LOL Well then, nuclear does not make sense either. No private company will insure a nuke against liability. They cannot be built without government subsidies. And they often end up being abandoned before they are ever completed. See the Satsop nuke in Washington state.

 

[Hafar1014]

What a liar you continue to be.

"Modern wind turbines typically have a lifespan of 20 to 25 years, with some capable of lasting up to 30 years or more under optimal conditions.

Lifespan​

• Design and Expectations: Most modern wind turbines are designed to operate efficiently for 20 to 25 years. With proper maintenance and favorable environmental conditions, some turbines can extend their operational life to 30 years or even longer, particularly in offshore settings where they may face harsher conditions.
  
  2
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Factors​

1. Maintenance Practices: Regular maintenance is crucial for extending the lifespan of wind turbines. Routine checks, typically conducted once or twice a year, help identify and address potential issues before they lead to significant failures.
   
   1
2. Environmental Conditions: The location of the turbine plays a significant role in its longevity. Onshore turbines generally last longer than offshore ones due to less exposure to corrosive saltwater and extreme weather conditions.
   
   1
3. Design and Material Quality: Advances in engineering and materials have improved the durability of modern turbines. Better aerodynamic designs and high-quality materials reduce structural stress and wear on critical components.
   
   1
4. Operational Management: Effective operational strategies can also enhance the lifespan of wind turbines. Smart management practices help optimize performance and reduce wear and tear.
   
   1
5. 
   
   
   1 Source

Conclusion​

In summary, while the typical lifespan of modern wind turbines is around 20 to 25 years, various factors such as maintenance, environmental conditions, and design quality can influence their longevity. With advancements in technology and proper care, many turbines can continue to operate effectively beyond their expected lifespan.

Energy Follower
How Long Do Wind Turbines Last? Average Lifespan Explained

greenbusinessbarbados.com
What Is The Average Life Of A Wind Turbine

In 10 years they are scrap. They cost too much to build, pollute the air kill birds and fish are ugly and produce zero energy when the wind stops. Nuclear power lasts 80 years never runs out of energy is clean and cost less over their long life. LNG is also clean and will always meet demand. Wind turbines have been canceled all over the country

 

[Old Rocks]

Cost too much and cant meet demand of AI and data banks. Doesnt work at night or when the wind stops. Then what. Blackouts.
Germany has over 30% renewable and manufacturing is leaving to come here because we are now on the road to nuclear and fossil fuels.

Ever hear of storage? Solar with storage is much cheaper than nuclear and cheaper than fossil fuels generation. Far quicker to build, and scalable, and the land it is on can be also used for other purposes, such as parking lots and farms. You are a fossil fuel shill, and a dumb one at that.

 

[Manonthestreet]

It may even cause global warming, the report noted, as, "Both in situ and satellite observations have suggested that nocturnal surface temperatures increase in the vicinity of wind plants as wind turbines mix warmer air from aloft down to the surface." 'Stealing the wind': Nations actually fighting over using too much AIR! * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh Why cant libs follow the science......instead of ifs and buts

 

[Hafar1014]

LOL Well then, nuclear does not make sense either. No private company will insure a nuke against liability. They cannot be built without government subsidies. And they often end up being abandoned before they are ever completed. See the Satsop nuke in Washington state.

Bill Gates bought Three Mile Island and it go online next year. Small modular reactors are the future. Renewable energy is dead. It cant meet the demand of AI and data banks, drives up the cost, and must be subsidized by taxes. Anything can be insured. A SMR can be built in 3-5 years.

 

[Old Rocks]

In 10 years they are scrap. They cost too much to build, pollute the air kill birds and fish are ugly and produce zero energy when the wind stops. Nuclear power lasts 80 years never runs out of energy is clean and cost less over their long life. LNG is also clean and will always meet demand. Wind turbines have been canceled all over the country

Liar.

The True Lifespan of Nuclear Power Plants - Seacoast Anti-Pollution League

Though nuclear plants are theoretically engineered to operate safely for 40 years—their initial permit life—our analysis of the overall record of US first

saplnh.org

 

[Old Rocks]

Bill Gates bought Three Mile Island and it go online next year. Small modular reactors are the future. Renewable energy is dead. It cant meet the demand of AI and data banks, drives up the cost, and must be subsidized by taxes. Anything can be insured. A SMR can be built in 3-5 years.

Again, you are a liar, and a shameless one at that. Nukes receive more subsidies than do renewables.




Like
Dislike

How Much Nuclear Plants Are Subsidized in the U.S.​

Nuclear power plants in the United States receive multiple layers of federal, state, and local subsidies, making them significantly more cost‑supported than most other electricity sources.

1. Federal tax credits

• Zero‑Emission Nuclear Power Production Credit (45U): Created by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, this credit is 0.3¢ per kWh (inflation‑adjusted after 2024) for electricity from existing nuclear plants sold after 2023. It can be multiplied up to 5× (1.5¢/kWh) if prevailing wage requirements are met IRS+1.
• Production Tax Credit (PTC): For existing plants, the IRA provides a $15/MWh credit (about 15¢/kWh) for the first 10 years, declining as wholesale prices rise above $25/MWh. If prevailing wage rules are not met, the credit drops to $3/MWh lp.nei.org.
• Technology‑Inclusive PTC & ITC: For new zero‑carbon plants (including advanced nuclear), the IRA offers a $25/MWh PTC or a 30% investment tax credit on eligible projects lp.nei.org.

2. Price‑Anderson Act liability cap

• This law limits nuclear operators’ liability for catastrophic accidents to $16.1 billion. Taxpayers cover the rest, effectively subsidizing the industry’s risk of major accidents Environment America.

3. Other federal supports

• Loan guarantees for new nuclear construction (up to $40 billion in additional authority under the IRA) lp.nei.org.
• Covered liabilities for past accidents (e.g., Three Mile Island, Fukushima) www.taxpayer.net.
• Access to federal facilities and foregone uranium royalties www.taxpayer.net.

4. State and local subsidies

• Many states provide zero‑emission credits, tax abatements, or direct payments to nuclear operators, which are included in “gross receipts” when calculating the 45U credit Congress.gov.

5. Total subsidy impact

• The combination of tax credits, liability caps, loan guarantees, and state/local support means nuclear plants often receive subsidies equivalent to tens of cents per kWh in addition to market‑based electricity prices.
• For example, a plant with 2.5¢/kWh gross receipts and meeting prevailing wage rules could get 1.5¢/kWh from the 45U credit, plus other state/local and liability‑related supports, effectively lowering its cost of electricity far below market rates.

Bottom line:
Nuclear plants in the U.S. are subsidized through tax credits (0.3¢–1.5¢/kWh base, up to $15/MWh PTC), liability caps (Price‑Anderson), loan guarantees, and state/local programs, with total subsidies often exceeding $10–$20/MWh depending on plant type, location, and compliance with wage rules. This makes nuclear a heavily supported energy source compared to renewables or fossil fuels.

 

[Hafar1014]

Liar.

The True Lifespan of Nuclear Power Plants - Seacoast Anti-Pollution League

Though nuclear plants are theoretically engineered to operate safely for 40 years—their initial permit life—our analysis of the overall record of US first

saplnh.org

SMR are very different thats new technology and thats the future. Renewable energy is dead.

 

[Old Rocks]

Bill Gates bought Three Mile Island and it go online next year. Small modular reactors are the future. Renewable energy is dead. It cant meet the demand of AI and data banks, drives up the cost, and must be subsidized by taxes. Anything can be insured. A SMR can be built in 3-5 years.

A wind farm or solar farm can be built and put online in a year.

 

[Old Rocks]

It may even cause global warming, the report noted, as, "Both in situ and satellite observations have suggested that nocturnal surface temperatures increase in the vicinity of wind plants as wind turbines mix warmer air from aloft down to the surface." 'Stealing the wind': Nations actually fighting over using too much AIR! * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh Why cant libs follow the science......instead of ifs and buts

Really? Netherlands and Belgium are on war footing with each other? LOL No, windmills do not cause global warming. By mixing upper air with surface air, they cause localized surface warming by as much as 0.24 C. However, that does not increase the net temperature of the atmosphere, it only redistributes it locally. People like you simply find logic too much of an effort.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Really? Netherlands and Belgium are on war footing with each other? LOL No, windmills do not cause global warming. By mixing upper air with surface air, they cause localized surface warming by as much as 0.24 C. However, that does not increase the net temperature of the atmosphere, it only redistributes it locally. People like you simply find logic too much of an effort.

Science deniers.......now go read

 

[Old Rocks]

SMR are very different thats new technology and thats the future. Renewable energy is dead.

Dumb-de-dumb dumb

The construction cost of a small modular reactor (SMR) typically ranges from $2,000 to $9,000 per kilowatt, translating to several billion dollars for a complete facility.

Capital​

The overnight capital cost for SMRs varies widely depending on design, technology, and location. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, SMRs generally cost $2,000 to $6,000 per kilowatt for construction, including the reactor, balance of plant, and related infrastructure. More recent U.S. estimates for a 462-megawatt NuScale SMR project indicate a total construction cost of $9.3 billion, or roughly $20,139 per kilowatt, reflecting increases due to detailed engineering and inflation.

small-modular-reactors.org+1

For comparison, traditional large nuclear plants can cost $4,000 to $9,000 per kilowatt, with total project costs ranging from $14 billion to $30 billion for a 1,000-MW facility. SMRs aim to reduce costs through modular construction, factory-based manufacturing, and smaller site preparation requirements, though real-world projects may still experience significant cost escalation.

The Cost Guys+1

Factors​

Several factors influence SMR costs:

• Reactor design and technology: Advanced designs like high-temperature gas-cooled or molten salt reactors may have higher upfront costs due to specialized materials.
  
  1
• Regulatory environment: Licensing and safety requirements can add to construction time and expenses.
  
  1
• Economies of scale: Standardized designs and multiple units can reduce per-unit costs over time.
  
  1
• Subsidies and incentives: Federal contributions and tax incentives can significantly lower the effective cost for utilities and ratepayers.
  
  1
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Operational​

Beyond construction, SMRs incur operating and maintenance costs, fuel supply, and waste management expenses. While nuclear plants are relatively cheap to operate compared to fossil fuel plants, these ongoing costs must be considered in the total lifecycle investment.

small-modular-reactors.org+1

Summary​

In summary, a small nuclear reactor can cost several billion dollars to build, with per-kilowatt costs ranging from $2,000 to over $20,000 depending on design, location, and project scale. While SMRs offer potential cost savings compared to traditional large reactors, real-world projects like NuScale demonstrate that construction costs can still be substantial, and subsidies play a key role in making them economically viable.

ieefa.org+1

small-modular-reactors.org
SMR cost estimates | small-modular-reactors.org


ieefa.org
Eye-popping new cost estimates released for

 

[Old Rocks]

Science deniers.......now go read

I did. Now how about you taking your own advice and reading for comprehension.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Dumb-de-dumb dumb

The construction cost of a small modular reactor (SMR) typically ranges from $2,000 to $9,000 per kilowatt, translating to several billion dollars for a complete facility.

Capital​

The overnight capital cost for SMRs varies widely depending on design, technology, and location. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, SMRs generally cost $2,000 to $6,000 per kilowatt for construction, including the reactor, balance of plant, and related infrastructure. More recent U.S. estimates for a 462-megawatt NuScale SMR project indicate a total construction cost of $9.3 billion, or roughly $20,139 per kilowatt, reflecting increases due to detailed engineering and inflation.
small-modular-reactors.org+1
For comparison, traditional large nuclear plants can cost $4,000 to $9,000 per kilowatt, with total project costs ranging from $14 billion to $30 billion for a 1,000-MW facility. SMRs aim to reduce costs through modular construction, factory-based manufacturing, and smaller site preparation requirements, though real-world projects may still experience significant cost escalation.
The Cost Guys+1

Factors​

Several factors influence SMR costs:

• Reactor design and technology: Advanced designs like high-temperature gas-cooled or molten salt reactors may have higher upfront costs due to specialized materials.
  
  1
• Regulatory environment: Licensing and safety requirements can add to construction time and expenses.
  
  1
• Economies of scale: Standardized designs and multiple units can reduce per-unit costs over time.
  
  1
• Subsidies and incentives: Federal contributions and tax incentives can significantly lower the effective cost for utilities and ratepayers.
  
  1
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Operational​

Beyond construction, SMRs incur operating and maintenance costs, fuel supply, and waste management expenses. While nuclear plants are relatively cheap to operate compared to fossil fuel plants, these ongoing costs must be considered in the total lifecycle investment.
small-modular-reactors.org+1

Summary​

In summary, a small nuclear reactor can cost several billion dollars to build, with per-kilowatt costs ranging from $2,000 to over $20,000 depending on design, location, and project scale. While SMRs offer potential cost savings compared to traditional large reactors, real-world projects like NuScale demonstrate that construction costs can still be substantial, and subsidies play a key role in making them economically viable.
ieefa.org+1

small-modular-reactors.org
SMR cost estimates | small-modular-reactors.org

ieefa.org
Eye-popping new cost estimates released for

How many windmills would you need to replace one nuke facility https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how...ual-energy-output-one-typical-nuclear-reactor This many and of course its more than that cause they rarely run at peak performance. You can shut up now

 

[sealybobo]

What a liar you continue to be.

"Modern wind turbines typically have a lifespan of 20 to 25 years, with some capable of lasting up to 30 years or more under optimal conditions.

Lifespan​

• Design and Expectations: Most modern wind turbines are designed to operate efficiently for 20 to 25 years. With proper maintenance and favorable environmental conditions, some turbines can extend their operational life to 30 years or even longer, particularly in offshore settings where they may face harsher conditions.
  
  2
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  2 Sources

Factors​

1. Maintenance Practices: Regular maintenance is crucial for extending the lifespan of wind turbines. Routine checks, typically conducted once or twice a year, help identify and address potential issues before they lead to significant failures.
   
   1
2. Environmental Conditions: The location of the turbine plays a significant role in its longevity. Onshore turbines generally last longer than offshore ones due to less exposure to corrosive saltwater and extreme weather conditions.
   
   1
3. Design and Material Quality: Advances in engineering and materials have improved the durability of modern turbines. Better aerodynamic designs and high-quality materials reduce structural stress and wear on critical components.
   
   1
4. Operational Management: Effective operational strategies can also enhance the lifespan of wind turbines. Smart management practices help optimize performance and reduce wear and tear.
   
   1
5. 
   
   
   1 Source

Conclusion​

In summary, while the typical lifespan of modern wind turbines is around 20 to 25 years, various factors such as maintenance, environmental conditions, and design quality can influence their longevity. With advancements in technology and proper care, many turbines can continue to operate effectively beyond their expected lifespan.

Energy Follower
How Long Do Wind Turbines Last? Average Lifespan Explained

greenbusinessbarbados.com
What Is The Average Life Of A Wind Turbine

I love the show Mountain Men. There is no doubt every man on this show is a Republican. They are after all, Mountain Men. No money, no access to gas or electricity where they live. They had to haul gas in which cost a lot of money. One day one of them installed one of these and suddenly, no more hauling in gas.

Put up some solar panals on the roof too.

Are republicans really pointing out the factories that make these things run on gas and coal? So what? Get 30 years of power from this bad boy.

 

[Paddlefoot]

Are you kidding?

Texas leads the nation in wind energy, hosting over 19,000 active wind turbines as of April 2026, which is more than the next three states—Iowa, Oklahoma, and California—combined. The state produces approximately 28% of all U.S. wind-powered electricity.

Is Texas in on the hoax?

We now know why Trump hates windmills. They can still get turned on by getting blown.

View attachment 1247867

I can't drive I45 coming or going from Houston to DFW without seeing 2 or 3 blades being hauled on it.